« ODP Founder Skrenta On Dying Open Directory | Main | Google & Orange Talking Google Mobile Phone? »
Dec. 17, 2006 at 5:35am Eastern by Danny Sullivan
You (& Sort Of YouTube) Named Time Magazine Person Of The Year
Time Magazine has declared You -- that's you, me, everyone -- to be this year's Person Of The Year. And You in a big way means YouTube, the video sharing site getting a long profile about how it has grown, with some interesting bits on how it now seeks to maintain its "underground image" as part of the "Google empire." So many ironies -- Google as all grown up; YouTube, a place with much of its popularity due to commerical rather than user generated content being shared, as underground.
I joked in my SES Chicago 2006 keynote last week that "video killed the search engine star," and I'll touch on this more in the future. But the Time magazine profile of YouTube -- associated with Person Of The Year -- underscores this. It's not Larry and Sergey; it's Chad and Steve (even if Larry and Sergey now own them).
I can't help but feel search engines have been shortchanged by Time. Ten years on, they've sparked a revolution, a real revolution, in how we obtain information. Far more people use search every day than ever, ever use YouTube or video sharing. And search engines have been allowing people to share their user generated content far longer than anything else on the web, in that they make it all accessible. Pity they never got a Person Of The Year nod, but we do love our moving pictures.
FYI, all Time "Person Of The Year" awards can be found here. Fifteen examples of the Yous as part of this year's award are in this article. Blog discussions can be found via Techmeme here.
|
Like The Story? Vote For It On Yahoo Buzz!
Send me the monthly search newsletter too! (Learn more about our newsletters and feeds) |
|
Subscribe To Our Search Feed! |
| Share & Bookmark This Story! |
By Danny Sullivan
Permalink
Jump To Comments
See Related Stories In: Google: General, Google: YouTube & Video, Search & Society: General




I feel your pain there Danny. The media gravitates towards things that are easy to explain and/or emotional.
Articles about things like national debt, arcane science issues and indeed anthing having to do with explaining data and information gathering usually get shortchanged.
I think that might change around the time radio shows pictures as you like to put it. ;)