Subscribe Via Web Feed Subscribe with Google Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Add to netvibes Subscribe with Live.com

« Good News, Bad News: LookSmart CFO Resigns, Company Ups Guidance | Main | Happy 10th Birthday, Search Engine Watch - A History Of The Site »

Jun. 8, 2007 at 4:28pm Eastern by Danny Sullivan

MacMillian CEO Charkin Steals Google Laptops To "Prove" Book Scanning Point

Via Techdirt, Book publisher steals Google laptops from The Register covers the jaw-dropping action of Richard Charkin, CEO of Macmillian Publishing, stealing laptops from a Google booth at BookExpo America to try and prove a point about Google "stealing" books for its book search service. Blogged Charkin:

Our justification for this appalling piece of criminal behaviour? The owner of the computer had not specifically told us not to steal it. If s/he had, we would not have done so. When s/he asked for its return, we did so. It is exactly what Google expects publishers to expect and accept in respect to intellectual property.

As I've written before (see here, here and here), the legality of scanning in-copyright books without permission and presenting short summaries (rather than reprinting the actual books) remains very much in question. Some publishers say Google is stealing content; others disagree, including Google. That's why we have on-going court cases to resolve the matter.

In contrast, there's not a lot of fair use or intellectual property debate over taking a laptop that doesn't belong to you.

A copyright statement does not give someone full rights to control content. It provides very specific rights, which are sometimes debated. While I'm not a lawyer, property law tends to be less debatable. If you don't own the property, you don't get to take it.

Perhaps Charkin can better understand the difference this way. Was it theft to read a book, then cite a short passage from it? Generally not. Was it theft to walk into a bookstore and physically take a book you didn't buy? Yes.

FYI, Charkin's blog lacks a robots.txt file, so I assume he has no problem with the thieving big G indexing all of his copyright-protected pages for the purposes of web search. To be consistent with his concerns over copyright, he really ought to put one up and block search engines from spidering his web site unless they call him up, send him an email, send him a letter or otherwise obtain his express permission.

Search Engines, Permissions & Moving Forward In Copyright Battles from me explains this issue in more depth. To be fair, I agree with Charkin that I'd like Google to stop scanning in-copyright books because unlike with web search, there's no easy way to automatically ask for permission. But legally, the search engine might very well be found to be within fair use guidelines. Certainly the question is less clear-cut than stealing a laptop.

Like The Story? Vote For It On Yahoo Buzz!
Subscribe To Our Daily Search News Recap!
Your Email:
Send me the monthly search newsletter too! (Learn more about our newsletters and feeds)
Subscribe To Our Search Feed!
Subscribe Via Web FeedSubscribe with GoogleAdd to My Yahoo!Subscribe with BloglinesAdd to netvibes
Subscribe with Live.comSubscribe in NewsGator OnlineSubscribe in RojoAdd to My AOL
Share & Bookmark This Story!
By Danny Sullivan Permalink Jump To Comments See Related Stories In: Google: Book Search, Legal: Copyright



Reader Comments

Wow, what a way to prove your point by taking the laptop.

There is a little problem with the demonstration (aside from the big one that it's just dumb). When Charkin took the laptop from Google, he did not take a copy of the laptop, nor did he leave a replacement behind.

No, he removed total access to the laptop. That's why taking it is considered to be far more serious than making a copy.

When you make a copy of a book, mp3 or movie, you do not at the same time go into the files of the company that owns it and delete all the copies. They still have the file. You have not prevented them from accessing, using or selling it. It's still, in all measurable ways - theirs.

Copyright is not related to theft of an object, it's related to interference of trade. There is a big difference between stealing money and causing someone else to make less of it.

Every time I run an ad, I cause my competitors to make less money (hopefully). That's not the same as breaking into their stores and taking away their stuff so they can't sell it.

Ian

Opps

Stealing is gross misconduct - good way to get the sack.

Search:

Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX Local & Mobile - San Francisco, CA (July 24-25) See the agenda, and register now!
SMX Sao Paolo - Brazil - (Aug. 7-8)
SMX China - September 23 & 24
SMX Stockholm - September 23 & 24
SMX East - NYC - (Oct. 6-8) Registration is now open.
SMX London - November 4 & 5

Search Marketing Now

Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.

Upcoming Webcasts:

Most Recent News Posts

About Search Engine Land

Stay Updated!

Get Our Search Newsletters:
Email:
Daily Monthly

Get Our Search Feed:
Subscribe Via Web FeedSubscribe with Google
Add to My Yahoo!Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to netvibesSubscribe with Live.com
Subscribe in NewsGator OnlineSubscribe in Rojo
Add to My AOL
More About Our Feeds & Newsletters

Add to Technorati Favorites

Track Us Socially:
Facebook: Our Search News App
Facebook: Search Engine Land Page
Facebook: Search Engine Land Group
Flickr: Search Engine Land
LinkedIn: Search Engine Land Group
Twitter: Search Engine Land Feed

Bragroll