Subscribe Via Web Feed Subscribe with Google Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Add to netvibes Subscribe with Live.com

« Google: Expects Viacom Will Take YouTube Data Without User Info | Main | Happy Independence Day & Search Logos »

Jul. 4, 2008 at 9:03am Eastern by Danny Sullivan

Google Uses 613 Words About Adding 1 -- Privacy -- To Its Home Page

Google's finally added a privacy link to its home page, explaining in 613 words why the company apparently can't have more than 28 words on its home page. So important is this number that adding the privacy link was an issue that had to go up two Google's co-founders. Please. On the same day that the privacy of Google's YouTube users was seriously threatened, what Google needed more were 613 words from one or both of the founders saying the company would take every step to protect its users. But on that subject, nada.

The entire privacy link issue was pretty silly. Ask.com Adds Privacy Link To Home Page, Hopes People Care explains how the New York Times had noted there was no direct privacy link from Google's home page, and that potentially, the company was in violation of California law because of that.

Google should have shoved a privacy link up immediately when this was raised, if only to seem responsive. Instead, the company dragged its feet -- and Ask.com looked even worse by trotting out how wonderful it was by adding a privacy link to its own home page.

Well, now we've got it -- and practically no one will click on it, but it's one less thing Google needs to worry about. Still, reading this:

How does privacy relate to homepage word count? Larry and Sergey told me we could only add this to the homepage if we took a word away - keeping the "weight" of the homepage unchanged at 28. Given that the new Privacy link fit best with legal disclaimers on the page, I looked to the copyright line. There, we dropped the word "Google" (realizing it was implied, obviously) and added the new privacy link alongside it.

I felt my eyes roll. Especially after yesterday, this just felt like too much overthinking an easy, simple change while a far more important issue was left without any public commentary on the blog at all.

For more, see related discussion on Techmeme.

Like The Story? Vote For It On Yahoo Buzz!
Subscribe To Our Daily Search News Recap!
Your Email:
Send me the monthly search newsletter too! (Learn more about our newsletters and feeds)
Subscribe To Our Search Feed!
Subscribe Via Web FeedSubscribe with GoogleAdd to My Yahoo!Subscribe with BloglinesAdd to netvibes
Subscribe with Live.comSubscribe in NewsGator OnlineSubscribe in RojoAdd to My AOL
Share & Bookmark This Story!
By Danny Sullivan Permalink Jump To Comments See Related Stories In: Google: Critics, Legal: Privacy



Reader Comments

Search:

Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX China (Nanjing) - Sept. 23-24
SMX Stockholm - Sept. 23-24: See who's speaking or register now.
SMX East (New York City) - Oct. 6-8: See the agenda or register today and save!
SMX London - Nov. 4-5: Pre-agenda rate now available. Click here.

Search Marketing Now

Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.

Upcoming Webcasts:

Most Recent News Posts

About Search Engine Land

Stay Updated!

Get Our Search Newsletters:
Email:
Daily Monthly

Get Our Search Feed:
Subscribe Via Web FeedSubscribe with Google
Add to My Yahoo!Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to netvibesSubscribe with Live.com
Subscribe in NewsGator OnlineSubscribe in Rojo
Add to My AOL
More About Our Feeds & Newsletters

Add to Technorati Favorites

Track Us Socially:
Facebook: Our Search News App
Facebook: Search Engine Land Page
Facebook: Search Engine Land Group
Flickr: Search Engine Land
LinkedIn: Search Engine Land Group
Twitter: Search Engine Land Feed

Bragroll