14 Differences Between Mobile Search & Desktop Search Results

When you write a monthly column on how mobile impacts search and social, it can be easy to forget that most businesses still aren’t thinking about mobile as something that impacts them today, and aren’t really planning for a future in which most of our online activity will take place on mobile devices.

For the few businesses that are taking advantage of mobile today, and not waiting until doing so is mission critical, it might not seem like much of a problem, especially when the competition has yet to catch up.

Yet, when I talk to providers of the tools we all use and ask them about features to track the impact of mobile on search and social revenue, I often hear that the market isn’t yet asking for these innovations.

Without the ability to measure how mobile impacts SEO and social, such as the mobile volumes available now in the Google Keyword Tool and in Webmaster Tools, it’s difficult for anyone to take advantage of mobile traffic, whether you want to or not.

If the market isn’t yet asking for these innovations, I think part of the reason is that marketers don’t yet understand why they should care.

Why Mobile SEO Is Different From Desktop SEO

To combat this, I’m going to spend the next few columns quantifying how mobile SEO differs from desktop SEO, in order to demonstrate that marketers who continue to do nothing and expect mobile search traffic to pour in on its own aren’t getting as much of it as they could be.

If I sound like a broken record to those of you who have been listening for awhile, forgive me, but it seems that’s necessary to convince some people that mobile investment is something that needs to start today. Evangelize with me and my fellow Mobile Monday columnists and we may have an easier time of changing the way people think about SEO today.

One of the major reasons why SEOs need to think about mobile today is that mobile search results on feature phone or smartphones differ from the search results that appear on a desktop browser. In a previous study late last year, I determined from webmaster tools data that rankings differ between smartphone and desktop browsers by 86%.

In that post, I started to get into the myriad ways mobile search rankings and interfaces can differ between desktop rankings and interfaces, but the list wasn’t exhaustive.

In order to convince those of you who still think optimizing for desktop search is enough to rank in mobile today and in the future, here are 14 ways that mobile (smartphone) search results differ from desktop results today:

  1. Local results are more likely in mobile, so Google Places listings sometimes appear higher in mobile results than they do in desktop, and domains with local intent are more likely to appear. If you have a local business that you’re interested in optimizing, this makes Google Places optimization essential, and may even call for domains with geo-modified keywords, depending on your situation. This tactic may conflict with a desktop SEO strategy that would consolidate link equity into one canonical domain; but it may be most effective for mobile visibility. The key to making the right decision for your business is fully understanding the situation and possible consequences of your actions. Not ignoring mobile search.
  2. Autocomplete results act as results before the results in mobile app search. Optimizing for mobile suggest with a search call to action in broadcast advertising may help users find the high-priority content surrounding your brand that they might not have found otherwise.
  3. Certain queries have interactive results in mobile, pushing web rankings down (see [weather] in Android and iPhone search, for example). Marketers who target these types of queries with interactive results may see a lower CTR, which might affect their selection of keywords in the first place. This would affect both their mobile and desktop campaigns.
  4. Android users are always logged in, so personalized results are shown more often than in desktop search. This might call for on-site messaging related to actions that change personalized search results, such as “bookmark this site for easier access in Google.”
  5. Positions of vertical results likely different in smartphone results. For example, video results are broken up on second line instead of placed on same line. Image results often appear higher in mobile search results. Image search optimization and video SEO often have a low priority in enterprise SEO, but if mobile is important to the business goals, this may change the overall priority.
  6. No Google Plus One in mobile results (yet). If you’ve received a directive to add a +1 button to all digital content, it won’t help in mobile just yet.
  7. Options gives the option of mobile formatting in smartphone results. This activates the Google transcoder and may make the site unusable for filling out forms or enabling conversions. Having a visible mobile site in search results to avoid the transcoder scenario may keep users who prefer mobile content from being frustrated, which may save a sale.
  8. Smartphone results have different filters at the top (Web, Images, Places, more versus Web, Images, Videos, Maps, News, Shopping, Gmail, more). Fewer places to filter may mean a higher CTR in mobile search.
  9. Carrier content such as ringtones highlighted for queries that match any keyword in carrier content, regardless of whether query is ringtone-related or mobile in nature. Ringtones could theoretically be optimized for broader terms as long as this carrier content in SERPs persists.
  10. Blended mobile ranking algorithm for mobile queries demonstrated at Searchology 2009. While it’s unclear how many queries this applies to in the U.S. at present, the post-Panda user-focused search results make it likely to grow in the coming years.
  11. Android Market or iTunes results for queries that include “download” or “app”. If your target keywords for desktop SEO include these keywords, they may have different results with lower click through rates in mobile search.
  12. Brand and store filters don’t currently occur in mobile smartphone search. If you get a lot of traffic from branded variants of those brand and store filters in desktop, it’s unlikely to help you mobile search. This may require different techniques for acquiring that lift in mobile.
  13. No option to block content in mobile smartphone results at present. This may change as Google gathers more information about the efficacy of its results in a post-Panda world; but for now the block content button happens only in desktop.
  14. If CTR and bounce rate data is used to determine ranking in smartphone results, CTR and bounce rate more likely to vary in mobile smartphone listings, as listings in search suggest, abbreviated title line breaks and descriptions, unusable desktop sites in mobile results, increased engagement of mobile users and the variations in ranking and UI mentioned above are all likely to change click through rates and bounce rates for smartphone searches.

In reality, there probably are more than 14 differences between mobile and desktop search in Google. These are just the ones I was able to find at a first pass through.

Chances are, as Google continues the trend of changing mobile search results to fit the user’s mobile context in order to continue their search dominance in mobile and fend off would-be competitors, there will be many more differences between desktop and mobile to come. Have you started to think about, or act on these differences in your SEO campaigns? If not, what are you waiting for?

 

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Mobile Search | SEO: Mobile Search

Sponsored


About The Author: is the Director of SEO Strategy at Resolution Media, and a primary architect of Resolution Media’s SEO product and Clear Target Digital Behavior Analysis. You can follow him on Twitter @BrysonMeunier

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • barbragago

    This is a great post. I am wondering the specific implications for the B2B environment. Are you finding that B2B buyers are leveraging mobile in this way as well, or is this more for consumer search?

  • http://www.mobilemartin.com/ Michael Martin

    Bryson,

    Even more of a difference in the feature phone results – google.com/xhtml – which googlebot-mobile crawls for to check rendering & DTD.

  • http://www.brysonmeunier.com Bryson Meunier

    @barbragago, thanks! I may do a post in the near future detailing specific implications for B2B marketers, but for what it’s worth I disagree with the notion that mobile search doesn’t have implications for B2B marketers. The fact that there are 246,000 searches per month for keywords containing the term “consulting” in Google from mobile devices is one indicator that mobile search matters for B2B marketers. If you have specific terms that you’re interested in testing, it’s helpful to use the Google keyword tool to forecast opportunity in mobile search.

    @Michael Martin, yes indeed. Feature phone SERPs are going to vary even more. Took the smartphone route as I’ve heard many people dispute that smartphone results differ from desktop results, but your point is well taken.

  • http://gregandcarrie.blogspot.com Greg Squires

    Great post, thanks for the summary. I’m curious what you have to say about mobile content redirects and mobile URLs, and how those impact mobile SEO. For example, my mobile content lives at m.mysite.com, and via browser detection we redirect the visitor and display this content on a mobile device rather than http://www.mysite.com. How are search engines handling this? What’s the best practice?

  • http://www.brysonmeunier.com Bryson Meunier

    @Greg Squires, great question. I’ve always been an advocate of building mobile-specific user experiences, rather than using handheld stylesheets to make sites mobile-friendly. I wrote a column on this earlier this year: http://searchengineland.com/why-mobile-friendly-is-not-mobile-seo-66192 . Redirecting to mobile content is well within Google’s guidelines (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mY9h3G8Lv4k), and they recommend it in the latest version of their SEO Starter Guide, so search engines should be able to handle it just fine. Thanks for the question!

 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide