Another Survey (Incorrectly) Predicts Google Could Lose Search Crown

In a “what’s wrong with this picture?” moment, AdWeek reports that Forrester Research has concluded that Google, for lack of user loyalty, is vulnerable to being dethroned and that another “Google Killer” may be lurking just around the corner. First the caveats and then the criticism of these findings and their implications.

All of my comments that follow are based upon the AdWeek summary of the findings and conclusions of the Forrester survey (n=4,800 US users). Here’s the most important bit of that summary:

[Forrester] found that brand loyalty to search engines is quite low. That coupled with the lowest of switching costs makes the still nascent search market an open playing field, the researcher concludes.

Over half of respondents said they search using multiple engines. Just 20 percent use Google exclusively. Yahoo is the exclusive engine for 8 percent, AOL by 3 percent and MSN a piddling 1 percent.

The problem with this research is that we’ve heard this sort of thing many times before and it’s never come true — never. In fact, Google has continued to gain share as competition has intensified over the past several years.

Another example of supposedly predictive survey data that failed to predict the future, in 2007 the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) found that Yahoo had edged Google in overall satisfaction for the first time. According to Larry Freed, President and CEO of ForeSee Results, which sponsors and interprets the “e-business” component of the ACSI this was supposed to be predictive of coming search share gains by Yahoo in the near future.

Here’s the relevant discussion from my post at the time:

The satisfaction data clearly don’t correlate with search market share. I asked Freed in this context why people should care and pay attention to the ACSI. Freed was confident that “search market share reflects past behavior. But the ACSI is predictive of future consumer behavior.” He said that historically it has been a very accurate gauge of future consumer behavior in other industries. He added that Google’s decline was a second dip in a row after a smaller decline last year.

But Freed and his predictive indicators were wrong: Google continued to gain share. And the following year Google rebounded in the ACSI.

Turning back the clock, analytics and traffic measurement firm Compete found in 2006 that Google had the greatest loyalty (by far) among a crowded field of search engines. (Here’s a contemporaneous write up of those findings by Danny.) And here’s discussion of another survey from Outsell, also from 2006, that shows Google as the top engine for “information workers.” I could go on with other examples that reflect similar findings.

Beyond this, several times, Google has been named the top global brand. All this generally reinforces Google’s “top of mind” association with search.

If one wanted to find other examples arguing in favor of Google’s (and/or search’s) potentially impending decline, as do the Forrester findings, one could cite that same 2006 Outsell survey which found apparently “rising dissatisfaction” with search. There’s also a 2007 survey from AutoByTel that argues consumers will increasingly turn to “vertical search” out of frustration with general “search engine fatigue.” Certainly people have used and continue to use specialized vertical sites. But that hasn’t impacted search volumes, which grew in December to 12.7 billion monthly queries in the US according to comScore.

Moreover, just a week or so ago, the Pew Internet & American life project reported that only search and email show consistent penetration and usage across age/demographic categories compared with other digital media activities.

While people undoubtedly use more than one search engine, as the Forrester data argue, Google’s near-term displacement at the hands of another internet search engine is so unlikely as to be almost impossible. That’s not to argue that Yahoo or Microsoft can’t gain share in search however.

It is possible that over the course of the next 5 to 7 years another strong competitor could arise to diminish Google’s position and centrality in the consumer internet experience. However that anticipated “Google killer” is less likely to be a conventional search engine than an alternative “platform” (social media is one that was perceived as search-threatening). The potential successor to Google is more likely to come in the form of new information access technologies or digital platforms (e.g., mobile, internet on TV) — or something very provocative like this.

Postscript: Forrester read this article and sent me the report, which is quite different than what was represented in AdWeek. The report doesn’t actually argue that Google is vulnerable as the AdWeek piece does. It reports data (n=5,400) from a larger Q3 “Retail Online Survey,” an aspect of which is search engine usage. The thrust of the argument in the report is that marketers should not ignore and can reach different audiences through search engines other than Google and Yahoo.

Related Topics: Channel: Strategy | Features: Analysis | Google: Business Issues | Google: Critics | Google: General | Stats: General | Stats: Popularity


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • svanboskirk

    Hi Greg – I saw your post on AdWeek’s recent coverage article about Forrester’s recent research on consumer search engine loyalty and I wanted to weigh in on the discussion. I’m the analyst who authored the report which is actually titled “Search Loyalty Is Still Hard To Find” and is focused on helping marketers realize the value of advertising on search engines outside of Google. I did not speak with AdWeek for their article and based on their representation of my research, I would say they drew conclusions that were neither implied nor intended in the report.

    The primary conclusions from the research are that Google is by far the leader in both consumer search use, as well as in advertising dollars, a position that is in no way threatened by any competitors, economic trends or emerging marketing channels. (In fact, as an aside, my opinion is that MS and Yahoo! should actually stop chasing Google in the search business, accept that they have a distant second and third place business and instead prioritize their online advertising businesses – places where they still dominate Google). What I wanted to highlight for marketers in this study is that although Google dominates search share, searchers do in fact frequent other search engines, sometimes preferring certain search engines for specific searches (like for financial content or video clips). This means smart marketers will certainly buy ads on Google, but should also target niche users on other search engines.

    Coop’s Corner actually provides an accurate representation of the findings from my study.;relnews

    I’m betting these conclusions are more inline with your own opinions and experience. Let me know if you agree.

  • LookingConfident

    Who needs to be (only just now), told of a “Google-killer” when I have been beating the drum that it’s on the way, for the past two years or, more? And the closest you can get to saying those few words Greg, words like….”Ad/Pub Networks/Global Exchange”, is your kind of each-way bet (?), in your granting, that:

    ** However that anticipated “Google killer” is less likely to be a conventional search engine than an alternative “platform”…**

    Only an opinion like yours. Always enjoy reading your thoughts even when I may have a different view to those you express.


Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide