Are Search Engines Biased?
Jul 23, 2007 at 9:08am ET by Barry Schwartz
Search Engines and Favoritism from Google Operating System has put together a quick study comparing the top results from Google, Yahoo and Microsoft’s search engines. The results showed that for 10 generic searches, the search engines (excluding Microsoft) tend to rank their own properties higher than their competitors.
For example, “Google ranked its own sites as #1 in 7 cases out of 10 and Yahoo in 6 cases out of 10,” said Ionut Alex Chitu. Ionut queried terms like mail, calendar, groups, toolbar, maps, desktop search, image search, video search, news search and search and plotted the results to show which engine ranked which engines where in their search results.
Google’s Matt Cutts denied that Google might give their own search results and preferential treatment.
If you’re talking about the algorithmic results, I can affirm that Google does not give any kind of boost to Google’s web pages.
Part of the differences may be how the companies choose to name and brand their products. For example, MSFT went with Hotmail rather than just mail, and they’re #1 for “hotmail.” Yahoo chose the name “local” for one of their services, and local.yahoo.com ranks #1 in Google for “local.” Google went with “Gmail” while Yahoo went with “Yahoo Mail,” so the #1 result for the search “mail” on Google is mail.yahoo.com.
I can’t speak to other search engines’ results, but I can say that Google doesn’t give any kind of boost to Google’s web pages in our algorithmic rankings.
All the search engines ranked Yahoo as the number one result for mail. But overall, it seemed like Google ranked their own properties higher than Yahoo or Microsoft, and Yahoo ranked their properties higher than Google or Microsoft.
You can create your own test cases at www.yahoogooglemsn.com.
Share, Bookmark & Discuss This Article
More:
Keep Updated: News Via Email | News Via RSS Feed | News Via Twitter
See more stories like this in the Members Library! Check out the Stats: Relevancy sections of the Members Library where this story is filed. Members also get access to exclusive video content, a members-only weekly & monthly newsletter, plus more. Check out all the benefits!
3 COMMENTS ON Are Search Engines Biased?
TOP STORIES
SEARCH NEWS BRIEFS
FEATURES & ANALYSIS
RECENT COMMENTS
- Carrie Hill said " Hi Ptremblay, The two I know off the top of my head are LiveBall from Ion Interactive - and HubSpot."
- allenkristina said " Definitely makes sense for Google to protect itself. I doubt many users will opt-out, or even know t"
- KevM said " What about mobile browsing? Has there been any mention of this plugin being extended to mobile versi"
FREE DAILY SEARCH NEWS RECAP!
SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update:
STAY CURRENT THROUGHOUT THE DAY
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
SMX Web Site » | SMX Difference » | SMX News »
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
- SMX Munich – March 23-24, 2010
- SMX Toronto – April 8-9, 2010
- SMX Sydney – April 22-23, 2010
- SMX Advanced London – May 17-18, 2010
- SMX Advanced Seattle – June 8-9, 2010
- SMX East – October 4-6, 2010
- SMX Stockholm – October, 2010
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
- Excel Tips & Tricks for PPC Success – March 18, 2010
- Paid Search and Big Brand Marketing – March 30, 2010
FOLLOW US SOCIALLY
- Wall Street Journal Recommended Reading
- Ad Age Power 150 Blog
- Technorati Top 100 Blog
- Techmeme Leaderboard Source
- Best Search Engine Community/Forum
Featured sites from our Blogroll
- JenSense
- Microsoft adCenter Community
- Shoemoney – Skills to pay the bills
- Joseph Morin
- Search Engine Strategies
Get Your Search Engine Land
Premium Membership!
Become a premium member today and receive:
- Express commenting privileges & photo.
- Exclusive videos & newsletters.
- Discounts to our SMX conferences.
- Access to "How To" & Other Archives.
© 2010 Third Door Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Google, Yahoo & Microsoft logos trademark respective companies and used with permission.
If you don’t only look at rankings but on how many pages getting crawled the bias is obvious.
Yahoo crawls 9 times more of its own content than from compitors, Live.com crawls 15 times more of its own content and Google crawls 1,06 times mor of its own content.
Or in other words: Microsoft looks in its own Search engine 15 times bigger thant it really is, Yahoo 9 times bigger and Google shows a slightly bigger picture from itself.
This needn’t be a bias by plan, only a side effect of Google being able to crawl almost the whole web and Live/Yahoo not being able to crawl external sites well.
So if you use only one search engine you miss between 98 % and 90 % of the pages that are out there – a strong hint that a meta search engine like search.com and others really make sense if you need a big picture.
You’re dealing with very complex systems here. The claim of bias is flawed because it doesn’t take into account the fact that each search engine does its own crawling. They don’t shape their results from a common pool of crawled/indexed pages, so the mix going into each search engine’s calculations is unique.
You would have to map out several hundred truly random queries (not selected by human testers) to get a better picture of bias. It’s quite possible that a “crawl bias” exists, if the search engines begin their outward crawls from their own content (which doesn’t make sense for Microsoft since they don’t really have a vetted directory like Yahoo! and Google).
You can’t deduce anything from looking at SERPs. When it comes to TBPR, people will easily note that there are 200 ranking factors, but when it comes to anti-Google propaganda, all logic apparently flies out the window.