Josh Davis drew attention to the DBCC situation in his post today, documenting how after receiving three link requests from the same person, he finally followed up, only to be pitched on placing a link from one of his articles to the DBCC site in return for $30 per month.

What’s Dun & Bradstreet — the nearly 200-year-old Fortune 500 company that brokers information about people and companies for business decisions — doing buying links? It’s not. DBCC was spun-off from D&B in 2010 and is a privately-held company, providing credit solutions to small businesses, with a license to use the D&B brand.

That DBCC isn’t a Fortune 500 company takes some of the “wow” factor out of the story. In addition, we’ve already had stories about big companies ranging from JC Penney to Overstock to even Google itself getting caught for paid links. That makes what DBCC was doing seem even less newsworthy to some. After all, doesn’t everyone do this now? What’s really new or unique here?

I supposed there is nothing particularly new, but clearly there’s a bunch of reminders that are useful to have out there.

Client Beware

Judy Hacket, the chief marketing officer of DBCC, sounded pretty horrified when I talked with her today about the situation. Her department was scrambling to discover how exactly it ended up with these links being purchased.

Davis connects the link request in his story back to iAcquire. Hacket wouldn’t say if DBCC is working with that firm, citing possible confidentiality clauses in contacts. She did say, however, “we have absolutely no agreement with iAcquire or anyone else allowing them to use any grey hat or black hat practices.”

Hacket was also adamant that DBCC had no desire to violate any of Google’s guidelines.

“We would never endorse something like this,” she said.

Of course, we’ve heard this type of denial / shock before. Recall what JC Penney said last year, after the New York Times profiled it for using paid links:

J.C. Penney did not authorize, and we were not involved with or aware of, the posting of the links that you sent to us, as it is against our natural search policies.

Curious to learn more, I asked JC Penney what those policies were after the New York Times story came out. A JCP spokesperson emailed me back:

We are not going to provide our policies, but obviously, they would include staying within Google’s guidelines.

Well, obviously! Except they didn’t, otherwise JC Penney wouldn’t have been banned. When JCP said it didn’t authorize or was involved with paid links, it meant that its SEO firm did all that. As I was told further in my email exchange:

SearchDex ran our SEO program. We do not pay for links as they go against Google’s guidelines. SearchDex was terminated because as our SEO provider they should have known. This was a clear failure on their part.

It was also a clear failure on JCP’s part, for not understanding what its SEO company was doing. The same is true for DBCC. Indeed, I’ve been joking that for some time, whenever some large brand gets dinged for paid links, it’s handy to have an SEO firm they can pin the blame on.

The reality is that for the large companies or brand names, this type of behavior seems to get a 90 day slap, then they’re back in Google’s good graces. It’s difficult for Google to permanently remove an important company that people expect to find. That means as a client, or as an important brand, keep these lessons in mind:

• Do you fully understand how your SEO company will obtain links for you?
• If you don’t want paid links, have you made that crystal-clear?
• If you approve of buying paid links, are you prepared for a potential short-term PR black eye?
• If you approve of buying paid links, is that worth a potnetial short-term Google penalty?

If you’re not a major brand or an essential resource that Google has to list, there’s really only one question you need to ask. Are you prepared to lose all your traffic from Google? That’s because for the non-essential people, being caught for paid links can be a death sentence, not a temporarily set-back.

SEO Company Beware

As for the SEO company buying links, you’d better be prepared for your client to toss you to the wolves, if a paid link campaign comes to light. Also do be prepared for that campaign to come to light, unless you’re incredibly careful with whom you are soliciting.

In this case, the SEO company pitched someone whose “About” page explains that he writes about marketing. That should have been a warning that this person is probably somewhat savvy about paid links, so some disguised pitch for one wasn’t wise.

I get these types of pitches myself. So does Matt Cutts, the head of Google’s web spam team. If I’d gotten this type of email sent to me on behalf of a major brand, I might very well have written about it myself and concerns about “outing” be damned. I’d view it as a protective service to the general human population. It’s like watching someone drive backwards on the freeway. They’re a danger to everyone.

As for iAcquire itself, it won’t comment on the case, citing client confidentiality. It won’t acknowledge that it was involved in any way, nor confirm if it has worked with DBCC. But the company did give me this statement:

We work with many of the largest brands in the world. It’s very common that we run into large brands everyday buying links from blog networks and large paid link marketplaces, and our mission as a business is to direct brand strategy towards whiter hat link building approaches.

That movement often takes time and effort – and, in the real world in working with big brands with pre-established objectives it frequently is a multi-step process, and requires a lot of education at both the SEO manager, online marketing marketing manager and CMO-levels. We are literally driving the education process every day.

To be clear, we are not a link network. Every link we build is based on the very same principles touted throughout the industry. Our links are contextual and relevant through outreach performed by 40 actual in-house people that sit in our Arizona office and everything is pushed through strenuous quality assurance.

Our business is to push brands to white hat strategy, but we frequently acquire new customers that are still on that path, and we support these companies toward that white hat direction. We have been investing significantly into our content marketing, social media, and digital PR channels to more rapidly make those changes internally and for these brands.

Regarding the article written about our company, we can’t talk about specific strategy for specific customers or potential customers – due to confidentiality agreements. Financial compensation for links does not represent the strategic direction of our company. iAcquire’s services are holistic and include a great deal of content marketing, digital PR and social media promotion, and on-page SEO consulting.

We’ve never had a problem with Google’s algorithm and our clients – and, we understand that it is important for us to continue to drive the market towards techniques that best represent the guidelines established by search engines. iAcquire continues to evolve its service lines, and recently brought in Mike King to help drive that direction to ensure we are considering search engine guidelines and industry best practices. In addition, he continues to promote these best practices at various conferences worldwide.

Wait, is iAcquire suggesting that DBCC — assuming it eventually emerges as a client — was one of those companies needing to be nudged into the white hat world? Cofounder Joe Griffin effectively said no, when he emailed this follow-up statement:

We aren’t talking about D&BCC (when we mention that we transition people from grey to white in the second sentence) – we can’t talk about specifics of clients or potential clients – we are prevented from doing so.

The enterprise world has a lot of nuances, and we believe we have more than anyone helped to correct SEO brand strategy as it relates to off-page SEO and specifically as it relates to killing black hat link networks.

At the end of the day we run into a lot of different goals, and different approaches, and we try to bring all clients to a fully white hat solution. Our team is heavily focused on high quality editorial content and creative development to attract links. We do a TON of link reclamation as well.

We brought Mike on board specifically to continue to build upon this direction. Mike is one of the best in the business in educating SEOs about how to properly implement off-page SEO strategy – he’s helping us here as well.

We are not a paid link company. We deliver holistic off-page SEO to small and large companies – and are the leading charge in proper off-page SEO education.

By Mike, Griffin is referring to Michael King, who I’d say has built a good reputation for himself in some SEO circles over the past year in his writings and speaking. He’s spoken at our own SMX events and is slated to again next month. He’s sharp, has lots of insight, and he seemed a win for iAcquire when they hired him about two months ago.

Suffice to say, I was pretty surprised that he appeared mixed up with all this. He’s seemed very white hat. I think it’s great if he’s going to help iAcquire and/or its clients move to white hat activities, but I’d say the sooner the better, if iAcquire really doesn’t want to be known as a paid link company.

Right now, however, if that link request is effectively coming out of iAcquire’s work, it might not be a paid link company, but it sure seems as if it has been buying links. That’s tough to square talk of following search engine guidelines.

Google, Oh Google

Meanwhile, there’s Google. This time last year, it was counting the news about JC Penney as a win in the war against paid links. A year later, has anything changed? Was it really that much a deterrent?

I honestly don’t know. I’ve heard some say that many SEOs buy links. That’s it’s just what you have to do. I don’t have any good survey data to back those types of statements up or knock them down.

Fair to say, however, today’s news didn’t surprise many. Even if it it had been D&B itself, I’m not sure if the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal would have cared to run stories, as they did last year with JC Penney and Overstock.

I do know that Google has got to come up with something better than counting links. I keep expecting that social will be a larger signal, and my previous story below explains more about why this makes sense:

• When Everyone Gets The Vote: Social Shares As The New Link Building

In the meantime, we’re stuck with the increasingly creaking, rotting link signal. But for anyone who thinks that’s an excuse for anything goes, look again to what I said the Client Beware section above. Are you really big enough to take a chance on being dropped from Google?

There are plenty of people who bought links who did get caught in the Penguin Update. Some of them are learning to their horror that the only chance of coming back will be to start completely over.

Finally, I did ask Google if it had any comment on the DBBC situation. Nothing specific, just this general warning:

Our guidance on paid links remains the same as ever: paying for links that pass PageRank violates our guidelines, and Google takes appropriate action in response.

If you don’t know what PageRank is, well, read our guide: What Is Google PageRank? A Guide For Searchers & Webmasters.

Publisher Beware; Link Broker For Shame

For those being approached about selling links, this is a reminder that Google really doesn’t like you to do that and has penalized sites for doing so since 2007. If you’re approached out of the blue with a link request, unless you block that link by using something like the nofollow attribute, you’re placing your site at jeopardy.

Don’t expect the link request to alert you to any of these things. The request that went out on behalf of DBCC was a classic example of non-disclosure. It lacks warnings about possible Google penalties. It even required that there be no visible disclosure, which might very well violate US Federal Trade Commission guidelines. From the request:

Link must not be marked as Paid in the visible content or source code (Common designations include: Partner, Links, Paid Links, Ads or Sponsored Links)

The link can’t have any disclosures, we want it to appear natural.

The whole thing reminds me of the type of spammy requests I get all the time. While people in the SEO space may want to debate whether it’s fair or required or commonplace to buy links or not, I don’t see much room for debate that you shouldn’t try to foist a paid link on someone without full disclosure.

As I wrote before, in my Conversation With An Idiot Link Broker article from 2008

There are plenty of people who disagree over the paid link issue, plus whether Google actually penalizes sites that hard for it. That disagreement is no excuse for unethical behavior. And there is unethical behavior in search marketing, and this is a perfect example of it. No risk was disclosed. When asked repeatedly about risk issues, they were denied….

You want to buy links or be a link broker? Then be upfront that this is an activity that Google does not like and that the faint hearted shouldn’t apply. Only after you’ve scared the heck out of them should you start talking about the ways that you’ll try to reduce the risk, if they choose to carry on.

Personally, I’m somewhat amazed, or really, disheartened, over some of the comments Davis is taking over his post. As I said, some dismiss the paid links as old news. Some are angry, viewing his post as some unnecessary “outing” of paid links.

No one seems bothered that some SEO firm was potentially getting a third-party web site into trouble with Google. That’s the most disturbing aspect of all of this. That’s not new, either, but it ought to be stamped out.

Related Stories

• Official: Selling Paid Links Can Hurt Your PageRank Or Rankings On Google
• Time For Google To Give Up The Fight Against Paid Links?
• Conversation With An Idiot Link Broker
• New York Times Exposes J.C. Penney Link Scheme That Causes Plummeting Rankings in Google
• 90 Days Later, J.C. Penney Regains Its Google Rankings
• Google’s Action Against Paid Links Continues: Overstock & Forbes Latest Casualties; Conductor Exits Brokering Business
• Google’s Chrome Page No Longer Ranks For “Browser” After Sponsored Post Penalty
• Google Chrome’s Paid Link Penalty Now Lifted
• Home Depot To Correct Misleading Link Request
• Google Launches “Penguin Update” Targeting Webspam In Search Results
• Two Weeks In, Google Talks Penguin Update, Ways To Recover & Negative SEO

Google has nearly 25,000 employees (according to a search I did on Google just now), and they’re involved with all types of projects. Many have nothing to do with search.

In the email I saw, a Googler (yes, it really was someone who worked for Google) was asked about the Penguin update, if they knew anything. Response?

I assure you 100% that there has been nothing at Google referred to as “Penguin.”

If you notice on those search results you sent me, not a single source is from Google itself.

The person asking had forwarded the Googler search results for “Penguin Update.” I’m not surprised there was no source from Google itself in those results. That’s because Google didn’t formally give Penguin its name until I pried it out of them two days after the launch, two days after the official blog post went up.

The Googler went on:

From what I just saw on this whole Penguin thing–it sounds to me like a lot of SEO companies that use shady and unethical practices are upset that their loop holes have been cut out!

Actually, it’s not really been a lot of SEO companies that I’ve seen complaining. It’s been a lot of individuals who have been hit, and quite likely for black hat SEO tactics that Penguin was intended to punish.

Bottom line: should you encounter one of those 25,000 Googlers, don’t assume that they have inside knowledge about ranking issues. Chances are, they don’t.

Knowledge Graph? “Graph” is a technical term used to describe how a set of objects are connected. Google has used a “link graph” to model how pages link to each other, in order to help determine which are popular and relevant for particular searches. Facebook has used a “social graph” understand how people are connected. “Knowledge Graph” is Google’s term for how it is building relationships between different people, places and things and report facts about these entities.

Big Change, Subtle Appearance

Earlier this year, the Wall Street Journal wrote about the coming change. At the time, I felt what was described seemed more an extension of things Google had already been doing rather than a dramatic shift. Now having seen it first-hand, I stand corrected. The WSJ had it right. This is indeed a big change in line with other major launches like Search Plus Your World last January and Universal Search in 2007.

Big change, but I don’t think it’ll be a shocking change to most Google users who will begin seeing it over the coming days on Google.com, if they’re searching in US English.

Google will still look largely the same as it does now. Knowledge Graph information flows into new units — they have no official name (and I did ask), so I’ll call them “knowledge panels.” These panels appear to the right of Google’s regular results, rather than disrupt those familiar links:

Knowledge panels don’t always appear, only showing up only when Google deems them relevant. But when Google does think they’re relevant, they’re a pretty cool search exploration tool. When the head of Google Search, Amit Singhal, let me play with the new system following his keynote talk at our SMX London show yesterday, I couldn’t help but think of it like a form of StumbleUpon or channel surfing for search.

Fact Surfing

A search for Star Trek brought up a panel that included a reference to Star Trek: Voyager, my favorite of all the series. Jumping to explore that, the Voyager box included a reference to Babylon 5, another favorite sci-fi show of mine. Jumping to that box, there was a reference to Claudia Christian, who wonderfully played one of the main characters in Babylon 5, Susan Ivanova. I surfed over for a look.

If you’ve ever started reading a Wikipedia page and then gotten lost jumping from one topic to another, that’s the experience I think many are about to discover with Google. You’ll not only discover answers to factual questions, but you’ll likely quickly explore more than you had planned and have fun doing it.

3.5 Billion Facts About 500 Million Objects

Google says it has compiled over 3.5 billion facts, which include information about and relationships between 500 million objects or “entities,” as it sometimes calls them. In general, entities are persons, places and things. You know, nouns.

In particular, these are just some of the categories of objects Google has facts about:

• Actors, Directors, Movies
• Art Works & Museums
• Cities & Countries
• Islands, Lakes, Lighthouses
• Music Albums & Music Groups
• Planets & Spacecraft
• Roller Coasters & Skyscrapers
• Sports Teams

Again, those are just some of the categories. The relationships are also as important as the facts. The relationships allow the Knowledge Graph to know which actors to list for a particular movie or which spacecraft have visited  a planet.

The Most Popular Facts

How do you keep from getting overwhelmed with useless facts? Google picks out the facts for each object that are most sought in relation to that object.

“We are showing all the things that people look for in a given query,” Singhal told me.

Consider these two knowledge panels, one for Simpson’s creator Matt Groening, the other for architect Frank Lloyd Wright (you can click to enlarge):

For both, you’re told when they were born and where they were educated. After that, the remaining facts shown differ.

Only Groening has facts about his parents and siblings listed. Why? Look closely at the names: Margaret (Marge), Homer, Lisa. Groening named characters after his own family. Looking at searches related to Groening, Google can tell these are commonly sought answers.

For Groening, the books he’s authored are listed. For Wright, his famous buildings are. That makes sense. People are far more interested in structures by Wright than by books by him. Indeed, Google’s autocomplete suggestions — which are based on the most popular terms related to a core search topic — reflect this:

I found it fascinating to see what was shown, as I ran through various classes of searches. For Disneyland, popular rides were shown. For a ride like Space Mountain, the duration was shown (really, only 3 minutes?). For an astronaut, I was shown the missions and overall time they’d spent in space (how cool to have that as a fact about yourself). For Buckingham Palace, the size of floor space was listed. For Larry Page and Mark Zuckerberg, their estimated net worth was shown.

Each knowledge panel has a “People also search for” area at the bottom which lists related people, places or things. Again, the relationships are determined by looking at search data. People who search for Groening, for example, often search for David X. Cohen, who co-created Futurama with Groening.

For search marketers, or anyone interested in how people search, these panels have become another great discovery resource along with keyword research tools like Google Trends, Google Insights, Google Correlate or the AdWords Keyword Tool.

Facts But Not Actions

One thing I found lacking was that the knowledge panels I saw often lacked links to let people take actions related to these objects. For example, one of the popular things people want in relation to Buckingham Palace is to book tickets for tours. However, the panel had no options for this.

In contrast, the new “Snapshots” announced (but still about a week from going live) as part of Bing’s relaunch last week are heavy on trying to help people do things like book tickets or reservations.

Why not have actions?

“We will, of course, explore that, but right now, we just want to take it out and see how it works,” Singhal said.

Occasionally you can take actions via the links to some of the source providers of facts, as with some music searches that might credit Songkick or StubHub.

Which Andromeda Did You Mean?

For some searches, there may be more than one entity that Google has facts for related to a search. In these cases, rather than make the wrong guess, Google will put up a “See results box” as shown below for Andromeda:

Andromeda could mean, in Google’s Knowledge Graph, the galaxy, the TV show or the Swedish band. This box, also known as a disambiguation box, allows people to make the right choice.

Where Do The Facts Come From?

How does Google know any of these facts? Google Squared was an initial attempt in 2009 to extract facts from the web. Google still has that technology, but the service was never that impressive on accuracy and closed as standalone site last year.

Rather, it was Google’s purchase of Metaweb in 2010 that really jump-started the Knowledge Graph. Metaweb was building both the relationships and, though Freebase, a database of facts.

Since that time, Singhal said Google’s massively grown the fact database. Contributions happen with Freebase, but data also comes from publicly-available sources like Wikipedia and The CIA World Factbook and even information out of Google Books. Beyond that, Google also licenses data from others.

“Wherever we can get our hands on structured data, we add it,” Singhal said.

Fixing Bad Data

Drawing from Wikipedia and other public sources means that there’s no guarantee that the facts are accurate. That’s why the knowledge panels on Google all have a “Report a problem” link at the bottom.

If you click on that, you can then indicate if any particular fact is incorrect. Singhal said that Google will use a combination of computer algorithms and human review to decide if a particular fact should be corrected

If Google makes a change, the source provider is told. This mean, in particular, Wikipedia will be informed of any errors. It doesn’t have to change anything, but apparently the service is looking forward to the feedback.

“They really are excited about it. They get to get feedback from a much bigger group of people,” Singhal said.

Will Publisher Traffic Drop?

Search engines have increasingly moved toward showing direct answers in their results over the years. Such efforts have worried some publishers, leaving them wondering if they’ll be left out of receiving search traffic. After all, if search engines provide answers right within their results, why would anyone click away?

Google’s Knowledge Graph is going to massively increase the number of direct answers shown, which will almost certainly renew concerns.

Singhal’s response is that publishers shouldn’t worry. He said that most of these types of queries, Google has found, don’t take traffic away from most sites. Part of this seems to be that the boxes encourage more searching, which in turn still eventually takes people to external sites.

Still, some are going to lose out, he admits. But he sees that as something that was going to happen inevitably, anyway, using a “2+2″ metaphor. If people are searching for 2+2, why shouldn’t Google give a direct answer to that versus sending searchers to a site? By the way, Google does do math like this already and has for years.

Below, you can hear Singhal talk more about this when asked by a member of the audience at SMX London yesterday:

Click here to view the embedded video.

My concern is what happens if publishers have compiled great information that someone at Wikipedia or Freebase harvests into a database. For example, if a Disneyland fan site has organized a list of ride durations by doing original legwork, what credit do they get if that data is used? Facts can’t be trademarked, at least in the US, so anyone can help themselves assuming they don’t duplicate the exact format or presentation.

Google does list credit links to places like Wikipedia. In turn, Wikipedia does give credit (albeit in a way that doesn’t help search rankings) to the sources it draws from. But that puts actual source material two clicks away from the searcher, assuming the searcher wants to go beyond the fact they already received.

This is one that has to be watched closely. As I wrote before, it seems likely the Knowledge Graph will impact a relatively small set of sites that focus on facts, sites that already likely exposing answers in their listing descriptions and so not getting traffic anyway. But we’ll see.

It’s also important to remember that the “main” results aren’t disappearing. Consider again the Frank Lloyd Wright search, this time with the knowledge panel in context with the regular results:

As you can see, links to sites outside of Google remain to the left and in the most viewed area of a search results page.

Being Included

What if you want to be part of the new knowledge panels and Knowledge Graph in general? Singhal said that at the moment, there’s no mechanism designed for sites to do this. IE, if you run a site about Frank Lloyd Wright, there’s no way to be associated as some type of suggested source for the Frank Lloyd Wright panel.

Potentially, you could head over Freebase, open an account and contribute. Of course, I’m pretty sure adding your blog to a horrible list of blogs like this isn’t going to help. Maybe other categories might be more successful, but I’d hold off, for the moment.

Tagging parts of your pages with commonly used schema might be helpful, though I wouldn’t do this solely in hopes of getting your facts into the Knowledge Graph. The articles below have more about using schema:

• Schema.org: Google, Bing & Yahoo Unite To Make Search Listings Richer Through Structured Data
• Google Takes First Big Bite Into Rich Snippet Search With Recipes
• A New Google Rich Snippet For Real Estate, Other Business Listings
• Google Adds Rich Snippets For Application Reviews: iTunes Apps, Android & More
• Google Adds Rich Snippet Support For Music
• How Retailers Can Improve Product Visibility Using Structured Markup
• Concert Rich Snippets: List Your Ticket Sale Site Under Band Web Sites
• MicroData & Retail Products: Not Ready For Primetime?
• How To Use Rich Snippets, Structured Markup For High Powered SEO

Ads, Mobile & Tablet Formats

Anyone familiar with Google’s ads will immediately wonder what happens when the panel shows.

Singhal said that if there are also ads along with a knowledge panel for any search, the ads will still display. Google also has different formats for when a query has a few, many or no ads. I haven’t seen these, but I’ll try to update as they become visible after the launch.

In addition, Google also uses special formats to make the panels work well on tablet and mobile devices, he said. They aren’t restricted to just desktop search, so that’s good news for those of you who want an easier time to cheat at pub and bar quiz nights.

Sadly, there’s no way to just search the Knowledge Graph directly. It only appears with regular Google Search.

The Competition

Google’s not alone in having a knowledge graph, of course. Wolfram Alpha, launched in 2009, has continued to refine its service. It got a big boost being picked as a search partner by Apple to help power Siri (even though that recently embarrassed Apple on a particular search about smart phones).

As for Bing, it has a partnership with Wolfram Alpha plus owns Powerset technology that, somewhat similar to the Knowledge Graph, tries to deeply understand the meanings of words, rather than just really match patterns of letters.

But Bing hasn’t really seemed to capitalize on either its Wolfram partnership nor Powerset. Really, the Knowledge Graph seems to be going more head-to-head with Wolfram Alpha. Does it?

“Wolfram is far more computational,” Singhal said, explaining that Wolfram Alpha’s goal seems to be finding ways that you can effectively use facts in computations.

For example, you can enter cars in california / california population into Wolfram Alpha to have it take those two facts and come up with an average (about 1 car for every two people, by the way, using 2009 data).

Google’s not trying to perform these types of calculations. The focus is instead on providing popular facts.

The Future

The big picture, of course, is that some day the Knowledge Graph won’t just be used for facts. Instead, if Google can better tag actual web pages to entities, then it can better understand what those pages are about and related to, which might increase the relevancy of its regular results.

That’s down the line, as are many other changes to the knowledge panel themselves. Today represents only a start.

“This is just a baby step, in my view, to expose this to our users,” Singhal said.

To learn more about the Google Knowledge Graph, see coverage from others across the web organized here on Techmeme, the official Google blog post, plus the official video, below:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Related Articles

• Google 2.0: Google Universal Search
• Powerset Launches “Understanding Engine” For Wikipedia Content
• Wolfram Alpha Live Review: The Un-Google
• Up Close With Google Squared & Some Wolfram Alpha Thoughts
• Google Buys Metaweb To Bolster Answers, Google Squared & Rich Snippets
• How Google Instant’s Autocomplete Suggestions Work
• WSJ Says Big Google Search Changes Coming? Reality Check Time!
• Google Testing “Sources” Area With Info About Movies, Books, People, Music & More
• Bing Relaunches, Features New Social Sidebar

Reviews Weren’t Weighted To Account For Number

When I looked into the Siri-Lumia issue last week, I speculated that Wolfram Alpha wasn’t doing any type of weighting of its results:

The bottom line is that Wolfram has ratings from Best Buy, and it’s not trying to weight those in any particular fashion such as number of reviews or number of purchases.

The Lumia rates tops on Wolfram because four people gave it 5 stars, versus 86 people who give the AT&T 16GB version of the iPhone 4S an overall rating of 4.7. The Lumia is batting 1.000 after being up to bat only 4 times. The iPhone is batting .940 after 47 at bats.

What I suspected turns out to be the case. Jean Buck, director of content development for Wolfram Alpha, emailed me a long explanation of what was happening:

You’re pretty much right on with your analysis of what was going on with Wolfram|Alpha. We do use Best Buy as our source for electronic product information. And we do match the customer rating information we get from them to the meaning and ranking of “best” products. I think this is pretty reasonable.

The problem comes in with this particular type of data. Normally, Wolfram|Alpha deals with precise numerical data; usually finding a superlative item is easy (e.g., highest mountain, most populous country, etc.). But Best Buy’s customer ratings are different in a couple of ways.

For one, it suffers from being “crowdsourced.” It’s not uniformly available for all products. And secondly, it’s not really numeric; there are only values between 1 and 5 (I believe). So our normal framework for dealing with ranked ordinal information isn’t really applicable. There’s great possibility for “ties” in values. We overlooked this in applying our ranking framework.

To summarize, Wolfram Alpha gets customer ratings only for phones that Best Buy carries (if I understand correctly), and it can’t even depend on getting fair sample of ratings for all of these.

In A 27-Way Tie, Pick One

The bigger issue is that if several phones are all tied with the same score, Wolfram Alpha wasn’t able to express that they were tied. Someone ended up ranking lower. Continuing, her email explained:

In actuality, for the query “best smartphones” (pluralized), we do return a pure ranked list. I believe we were actually showing 27 products with a rating of 5, the iPhone 4s being one of them. But for “best smartphone,” we returned only the product that appeared at the top. Clearly, if 27 phones returned the same value, we should have listed all of them.

In other words, the Lumia wasn’t the best rated smartphone. It was one of 27 equally tied phones (some of these weren’t even phones, even). But if someone searched for “best smartphone,” Wolfram picked only one of the 27 phones — the Lumia — to rank tops.

New Weighting In Place

So what’s been changed? Buck’s email continues:

To rectify the lack of sophistication in our ordinal framework, we need to do a couple of things. The first two fixes have already taken place.

We’ve weighted the actual ratings by the number of reviews. And if we have “ties” in the data, we no longer return only the item that appears at the top of the list (which is purely an artifact of having the first item returned by the database that matches the criteria at the top of the list.) You’ll see the difference if you query for “best smartphone” now.

Weighting the results makes sense, a good improvement that doesn’t let a phone with only a few ratings win top honors. If there are ties, no one phone will “win” simply because it was the first in the database.

Buck said that Wolfram Alpha is now clarifying that the ratings are based on Best Buy user reviews and weighted by number of reviews. As for additional changes, she said:

We still have to add a bit more sophistication so that complete “ties” don’t return different ordinal rankings (the first column in our table); sometimes it’s possible that there really isn’t a unique “top” ordinal value.

If two smartphones both have perfect 5′s based on the same number of reviews, we shouldn’t list one as 1st and the other as 2nd simply based on how our database query returns them. But this will take more time, since it could potentially affect everything that we can possibly rank.

How’s It Look?

Now let’s look at the current ratings:

The first arrow shows how Best Buy data is being better cited. The second arrow points to a More button that, if you use it, will make the list grow.

Keep doing that, and eventually you’ll see the 30th ranked phone finally have a score less than 5. So are all those with a 5 a tie? Buck told me, in a follow-up shortly after I posted this article:

These are real ties. Rounding does happen, but only at the fifth digits. If there is a tie, we use a secondary criteria to resolve the tie.

So while it looks like the iPhone beats the Lumia, and the HTC Trophy Android phone beats them both, apparently they’re all tied for first.

Of course, you won’t be getting these results on Siri. Whatever caused Siri to send searches for this topic to Wolfram Alpha for what appears to be a small number of people seems to have stopped.

As for the jokey responses that people get, like this:

Some have assumed Apple just started doing this because of the Lumia situation. That’s not the case. These existing way back when Siri first launched on the iPhone 4s, as I covered in my earlier story: Apple Siri’s Recommending Nokia? Then Nokia’s Recommending Android & iPhone, I Guess.

Finally, Buck said that Best Buy data is updated at Wolfram Alpha every two weeks, so there will be a slight lag behind Best Buy itself, at times.

We’ve been here before, such last December, when Apple was accused of preventing Siri from finding abortion clinics. Actually, that was largely down to abortion clinics themselves not calling themselves that, as my post from last year explains: Why Siri Can’t Find Abortion Clinics & How It’s Not An Apple Conspiracy.

Say What, Siri?

What’s going on now? It seems to have started with WMPoweruser, a Windows Phone site, which published a screenshot showing how Siri, when asked “What’s the best cell phone ever,” listed the Nokia Lumia 900:

WMPoweruser correctly explained that the information was actually coming from Wolfram Alpha, which provides certain types of answers to those who search using Siri. Similarly, Yelp provides some answers, as does Google.

Still, the story went on to hit a number of tech blogs since then. MG Siegler follows it around, and Techmeme has a round-up of stories. Me, I thought I’d trace the data itself back to the source, Wolfram Alpha.

Say What, Wolfram Alpha?

If you ask on Wolfram “What’s the best cell phone ever,” it comes back with the Lumia listed like this:

This is the listing that “powers” what some saw on Siri.

Note the two arrows. The first is Wolfram is deciding to show “best mobile phones” sorted by the highest customer reviews. It picks the top one from a full list shown further down on the page. The second arrow shows how many reviews are apparently getting the Lumia that top rating.

It’s a total of four. Four is a pretty small number. You really want a lot more reviews than that before you go declaring anything to be the best.

Say What, Best Buy?

You can’t actually see these reviews on Wolfram Alpha, but I can show you where they’re almost certainly coming from. Best Buy.

At the bottom of the page is this:

Click on the image if you want to enlarge it. See the arrow? Clicking on the “Source information” link that it’s coming from makes the Source Information box it’s pointing to appear. The source turns out to be Best Buy.

Unfortunately, you can’t click to any actual list that Best Buy might have of “the best cell phones ever.” But I can go to the Best Buy page for the Lumia 900 and see what’s shown:

Here, we can see that the Lumia has a 5 star rating like Wolfram shows. This time, it’s based on six reviews. That means Wolfram is probably a little out-of-date. But then look at the bottom. Actually, this has a 4.4 star rating, based on 11 reviews. What’s happening there? I don’t know. Maybe these are reviews for all colors of the Lumia.

Now, what I really want is the list of top rated phones from Best Buy, to see if they match the list Wolfram has. As it turns out, that’s pretty easy. There’s a mobile phones page, with an option to filter to top-rated phones.

Doing this, it turns out the top rated phone is the Rocketfish Mobile-Micro USB Data Transfer Cable. I know that seems weird, but when you speak into one side of it, the person at the other end can hear really well.

OK, there’s some glitch. But after that, it’s the iPhones coming up:

I kept trying to find a way to get Best Buy to give me a list like Wolfram had. I could never exactly replicate it. But I got close. That screenshot above? By default, top rated phones are also shown weighted by top selling, which makes sense. You’re getting a combination of metrics.

If I sorted by purely highest rated, the HTC Trophy came first, followed by the iPhone. The same thing happened if I kept that sort but narrowed to “Best Buy items.” If I instead narrowed to online-only items, then I could make the Lumia 900 show up.

Of course, Wolfram will use its own mechanism for sorting. The bottom line is that Wolfram has ratings from Best Buy, and it’s not trying to weight those in any particular fashion such as number of reviews or number of purchases.

The Lumia rates tops on Wolfram because four people gave it 5 stars, versus 86 people who give the AT&T 16GB version of the iPhone 4S an overall rating of 4.7. The Lumia is batting 1.000 after being up to bat only 4 times. The iPhone is batting .940 after 47 at bats. Or something like that. I like baseball, but I’m not a baseball stats expert.

Say What, Lumia?

All this got me thinking. What would the Lumia give me if I spoke to it? The Lumia, after all, features voice search like Siri, only it brings back results from Bing.

A search for “What’s the best cell phone ever?” brought back answers that were polluted with news stories about what’s happening with Siri and the Lumia today. So, I tried a search for “best cell phones,” figuring that was fair. A search for the singular “best cell phone” also gave me the same top sites:

These results come from Bing, Microsoft’s search engine, and the top site listed is a review of what CNET considers the top five cell phones. The best phone on the list the Lumia recommends, via Bing’s results, is the Motorola Droid Razr Maxx:

The Lumia is even recommending the iPhone over itself, if you want to attribute this list as a Lumia recommendation. The iPhone ranks third; the Lumia ranks fourth.

Meanwhile, The Next Web did that same thing but with a different search, “What is the best smartphone ever,” bringing up a review from Business Insider that recommends the iPhone.

Say What, Siri?

As for Siri, I can’t get it to do the same thing for me, not as WMPoweruser found nor when trying things like “What is the best smartphone ever,” which Apple Insider used.

Nope, for me, Siri either gives answers that Apple’s Siri team have programmed in as jokes (and which predate what happened today), or occasionally I get a local search:

As I said, some of these jokey responses did exist before. Why some started getting them to bring up Wolfram Alpha instead isn’t clear, but Siri can be strange and mysterious that way.

Postscript, May 14: CNET has a story up suggestion that Siri has suddenly changed to these jokey responses. As I said, I was pretty sure they existed before. I was correct, as you’ll see in these examples from last year.

By the way, I coincidentally wrote a column today over at CNET about what it’s like living with phones for all three major smartphone platforms, the iPhone, Android and Windows Phone.

I like them all in various ways. Windows Phone is nice, in fact nicer than Android, when it comes to doing email (the iPhone is even better). Android has its own strengths over the iPhone, just as sometimes the iPhone is better than Android.

Ultimately, what’s the best smartphone will be down to the person who actually uses it.

Now I’m off to order some tomato soup. Because it’s raining outside, and I don’t want to put on real shoes:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Postscript: See my follow-up story, With Fix In Place, Wolfram Alpha Explains How Siri “Recommended” The Lumia By Mistake

Hey Google, How’s New Girl?

I thought I’d start with a search for New Girl. It’s a great show. I should know. I was a Fan of the Week. What’s Google show me?

The arrows point at things that have come because of social connections, and I’m only going to focus on these things, in this head-to-head. Do these additions seem to help or hurt my results?

Google tells me at the top that someone I know has +1′d the official site. Maybe that calls my attention to it more, but I could take it or leave it.

Further down, my own post on Google+ about being made Fan of the Week appears. I say point to Google. Ego searches are one of the key ways people historically judge search engine relevancy. Can they find your own stuff? Google could.

Further down, the official New Girl Facebook page is listed. It only shows up this high because I’m “friends” with New Girl on Google+. Content that your friends like moves higher. If I turn off the personalization that Search Plus Your World does, that link drops from the top results.

Finally, to the right side is information from the New Girl page on Google+. This is nice to see, helpful.

New Girl On Bing

Over on Bing, there’s less going on. The IMDB listing has a thumbs-up, to alert me that one or more of my friends likes it. I like this a little better than Google flagging pictures. It feels cleaner, less intrusive.

Further down on the page, I’ve shown one of two different links that appear with a trending arrow, to alert me they are currently being frequently shared on Twitter. Again, kind of nice, though also kind of confusing when there’s also a news box.

Bing really falls down in the Sidebar are, where it should really shine. I follow the Facebook New Girl page, but that’s not shown. I do get the Twitter account of Zooey Deschanel, the main character of the series. But why not show me at least the Twitter account for the New Girl show itself?

In the end, I think Google comes out ahead on social integration, in this case.

Google & Penguin

If you’re in the search marketing space, Penguin recently changed from being one of those cute flightless birds to the name of a new Google update aimed at web spam. This seemed a perfect test for the new social features. What would a search for Penguin yield?

Mixed among the regular results, Google gave me three based on my social connections. The top was something I myself had just shared on Google+, a new article I published about Penguin. OK, relevant, but not that helpful. I know I published the article. And really, what I’d rather have is a link to the actual article instead of a link to my post about the article.

After that, more Google+ — this time a post from my news editor Barry Schwartz, sharing a video related to Penguin. Lastly, an article I wrote on Marketing Land.

Overall, these things make sense to appear, but some more variety, some posts on Penguin from others in my social network, those might have been more helfpul.

Bing & Penguin

Next up, Bing:

The Sidebar on this particular query is pretty useless. It’s mostly people who have pictures of penguins. Apparently, none of my Facebook friends have shared or posted anything to do with the Penguin Update.

Over in the main search results, impressive success. Because I and another person have liked my original article on the Penguin Update, it ranks tops in my personalized results.

I call this test about even. I felt Google didn’t give me much variety, but neither did Bing.

X-Games

One of my son’s is big on BMX, so I tried a search for X-Games as a final test. Here’s are the social results I got back, Google on the left, Bing on the right:

Nothing dramatic, really. Wow, I get my own pictures on Google. Might be useful, but since I know X Games itself on Google+, why not at least suggest that? Meanwhile on Bing, I can see that several of my friends like X Games on Facebook, but why not list the page itself?

Social Is Still Developing

In theory, social mixed with search sounds great. In reality, it’s still has a long way to go. For some background on some of the challenges, I really urge you to see my post from earlier this year, When Everyone Gets The Vote: Social Shares As The New Link Building.

Related Articles

• The New Bing: Microsoft Tries Again With Search Meets Social
• FAQ: What’s The Debate About Google’s Search Plus Your World?

]]> http://searchengineland.com/the-new-bing-vs-googles-search-plus-your-world-120817/feed 9 http://searchengineland.com/the-new-bing-microsoft-tries-again-with-search-meets-social-120728 http://searchengineland.com/the-new-bing-microsoft-tries-again-with-search-meets-social-120728#comments Thu, 10 May 2012 17:00:19 +0000 Danny Sullivan http://searchengineland.com/?p=120728 Bing announced a relaunch of its search engine today, with a big emphasis on bringing social into search. But wait! Didn’t Bing already have social as part of its search experience? Yes, but now the search engine hopes to do it better, especially by largely off-loading social elements into a new sidebar area.

The new features will appear for Bing users in the United States the coming days, taking several weeks to go live fully for everyone.

Postscript: The new Bing should now be live for everyone. If you don’t have it, see the instructions here: Bing’s New Social-Friendly Search Interface Now Live.

The New Bing

What’s in “The New Bing,” as the Microsoft post pitches it as? A three column design with Core Search, Snapshot & Sidebar panes

• Core Search loses many of the social annotations that Bing has added over the years
• Snapshot provides additional information about a particular search listing, without having to leave Bing
• Sidebar serves as a new home for social integration with search

Bing’s put together a short video explaining the new features, which you can watch below. After that, I’ll take you on my own personal tour of the changes

Let’s take a closer look at the changes.

The Social Sidebar

I’ll start with the new social sidebar, as it’s the most dramatic of the changes:

In the sidebar, various social elements may appear depending on how relevant Bing decides they are to your search. In the case above, I did a search for Costa Rica, which triggered three of the four main elements you’ll see:

• Ask Friends
• Friends Who Might Know
• People Who Know
• Activity Feed

Let’s drill-down further into these areas.

Friends Who Might Know

In the “Friends Who Might Know” area, if you’re signed-in to Bing, people you know on Facebook who may have knowledge about what you’re searching for are suggested:

In this case, a variety of my Facebook friends are suggested. Frank Gruber is on the list because he’s shared some photos on Facebook about Costa Rica. Others are on the list because they’ve liked various pages on Facebook related to the country.

By hovering my mouse over any individual, I can learn more about why they are suggested. In the example above, Patti Bailey has liked a number of pages on Facebook that are related to Costa Rica.

It’s easy to see the value here. If I’m headed on a trip to Costa Rica (which I actually am later this year), in addition to doing research by looking through traditional search listings, now I can also find friends that I might ask for advice. In fact, Bing has added feature to make this easy:

In the example above, I clicked on the little person/plus symbol icon next to Patti Bailey’s name. That opened up a box that listed my search topic, then allowed me to add links from the regular search results to the box, if I wanted, along with a question for her. Pushing the Post button would make the question go to her Facebook newsfeed.

When you ask someone a question, anyone who can see your Facebook Timeline will see the question. As for your friend, they get a message about the question, but none of their friends see it. It’s like sending them a direct message.

Ask Friends

What if someone you want to ask a question to in relation to a search doesn’t appear? That’s where the “Ask Friends” box at the top of the sidebar comes in. It allows you to ask all your friends at once:

After you do a search, you can type in the “Ask Friends” box, and that will go out to your Facebook friends. Of course, which ones will actually see it depends on Facebook itself. Facebook’s “Edgerank” algorithm doesn’t show everything that you post to all of your friends. Rather, it tries to guess which friends would find something you post to be especially interesting.

If you look close, you’ll see that my post was tagged only to show for me. I’m not sure why this happened. It could be because I was using the new Bing features before they formally launched. It might be that I’d previously authorized Bing to work with Facebook and restricted it to only show activity to me.

It’s a good reminder that you can exercise specific control over the app. In Facebook, if you go to Account Settings, then to Apps, Bing will be listed. From there, you can control who sees what the app posts:

Finally, when your friends respond, you’ll see that within the original question, like this:

You can also see responses through your Activity area, explained further below.

By the way, Google already has a feature like this, introduced in January. “Ask On Google+” Links Appearing In Google’s Search Results explains more about that. I felt it was an intrusion on Google+. On Bing, the same feature tucked to the side seems welcome.

People Who Know

So far, all the social features I’ve covered have been Facebook-specific. You can ask friends for advice, but only your Facebook friends. What about friends on other social networks? Or what about finding people who aren’t friends but who still might be useful sources of information in other ways.

Consider a search for Google on Bing. That provides a variety of people showing up in the People Who Know area, including the head of Google’s web spam team, Matt Cutts. I’ve hovered over him to bring up his profile:

Cutts is showing up because Bing, looking through the Twitter access is has access to, considers him relevant to a search on Google. Indeed, he is. This also illustrates how well “People Who Know” gets Bing out of a possible Facebook trap. Cutts closed his Facebook account in 2010. If Bing only looked at Facebook, he wouldn’t come up as a suggestion.

It’s not just Facebook and Twitter that get to play in the social sidebar, however. Social suggestions might also come from LinkedIn, Quora, Foursquare, Blogger and — wait for it — Google Plus:

That’s Vic Gundotra, the Google executive in charge of Google+ and Google’s social efforts. He’s showing up because Bing believes his Google+ page is relevant to those searching on Google.

How’s Bing getting Google+ information? Simple. These are public pages that it crawls already. Bing told me:

To get the content for the “People Who Know” section we mine public blogs, tweets, and Google+ posts to find information relative to the topic of interest.

Bing also clarified that the suggests in People Who Know should be the same for everyone. They aren’t personalized to a particular person, as is the case with Friends Who Know.

Bing’s Doing What Google Doesn’t?

Some might recall a dispute that emerged after Google revamped its own search meets social effort, Search Plus Your World, which launched in January. To recap:

• Google added a new People & Pages box that offered suggestions of accounts to follow, but only accounts from Google Plus.
• After complaints of favoritism, Google argued that it couldn’t get the information it needed from the other social networks, due to deliberate blocking.
• Twitter and Facebook whipped up a “Don’t Be Evil” toolbar using data from the open web to disprove this.

Now Bing is also using open web data to seemingly have more suggestions from a variety of social networks that Google does. It’s even including Google! Expect that to be used as a point against Google.

However, Google still has an argument that it cannot get all the same data on the open web as Bing. Twitter actually closed itself off to Google last year, blocking Google from even getting open web data. Even if Google renews a deal with Twitter, it’s now gunshy about building features around something that might disappear. Meanwhile, Facebook doesn’t seem to allow public posts out to the open web.

Bing doesn’t have these issues, with a deal in place with Twitter and Facebook and no apparent blocking by Google. I actually hope that Google and Twitter get past their impasse; I’d like to see Facebook fully open up, as well. My previous thoughts on all this are here: A Proposal For Social Network Détente.

Activity

The final element of the sidebar is the Activity area. This is a running feed of questions you’ve asked or those asked by those you know, through Bing’s connection with Facebook:

In the example above, you can see how Derrick Connell, the corporate VP over Bing, was asking a question out to his Facebook friends. Since I’m one of them, I saw his question appear in my Activity feed. Clicking on it allowed me to respond; hovering over it shows me all the responses to his question.

Hovering over my own questions also lets me see responses I might have received:

Unfortunately, there’s no to jump into Facebook from the Activity area to a particular question, nor is there some type of dedicated Activity page where you can review everything. If you’re on Bing, and you want to check for responses, you oddly have to search for something just to get the feed to appear. Otherwise, you have to go to your Facebook Timeline or those of your friends to hunt down responses.

Core Search Results & Social

Earlier, I’d said that Bing was off-loading social elements that previously were in its “regular” or “main” search results, the listings on the left-most side of the screen. Social elements it has tried since its Bing’s first big social push in October 2010 included things like this:

or this:

Those are gone, now. There’s some social in the results, but it’s very subtle. Why the move?

“The [social] annotations were not as helpful as expected. They also blunted relevancy. People weren’t sure if it was more or less relevant when they appeared,” Connell told me.

That goes against Google’s suggestions that social annotations help, or at least that they help clickthrough rate. It’s one reason Google provides tools for publishers to measure this for themselves.

Expect more debate and examination to follow. But I have to say, losing that stuff does help give Bing an even cleaner look that what it already tidied up last week in preparation for today’s relaunch.

As I said, social is still there. Consider these search results:

Trending Arrow & Friend Thumbs-Up

The first example shows a little gray arrow pointing upward. The red arrow I’ve added, to point to what happens if you hover over the gray arrow. It causes it to be surrounded by a blue circle, with a little box showing up that says that particular search results it trending on Twitter and Facebook. This trending arrow may also appear next to items that are doing well on either Twitter or Facebook, rather than both.

The second example has a thumbs-up icon. Hover over that, and it’s surrounded by a blue circle, with a box providing more information. In this case, I’m shown that four of my friends like the site the article is from. If I hover over any of the friend icons, I can see their actual names — though if there are more than three, I can’t see the full list. I’m also told that in addition, the item is trending on Twitter.

In summary:

• Thumbs-Up = Results has social activity from your friends
• Trending Arrow = Result has social activity not from your friends by a wide number of people in general

In the annotation boxes, you’ll sometimes see that a site name appears. For example, look at these two results for a search on Obama:

Notice how the first example has a link that says “The White House.” This link leads to the official White House page on Facebook. In contrast, the Barack Obama campaign site, despite having its own popular Facebook page, doesn’t get a similar link.

What’s going on? Here’s how it works:

• “Like FACEBOOK PAGE” - If your friends like a Facebook Page associated with a site that appears in the results, a link to the Facebook Page appears in the box
• “Like DOMAIN NAME” – If your friends like a web site, and a page from within that web site appears, a link to the root domain of the site is shown in the box
• “Likes This” - If your friends like a particular web page, and that exact page is listed in the results, then no link appears in the box

Social & Core Results Personalization

Bing began personalizing its search results last year, and that still continues, with your location and your past search history being key signals. But social also plays a role.

Things that are trending on Twitter or Facebook in aggregate might rank higher for a short period of time, Bing told me.

In addition, in testing, I can see that things that are liked by me or by my friends might come higher in the results, if I’m signed-in. This is similar to how Google’s Search Plus Your World works.

Snapshot

When Bing initially launched three years ago with the “Decision Engine” tagline, it was also billed as something that would help people accomplish task. But for the most part, it never really seemed to deliver on that promise in any unique way.

Snapshot, new information that appears in the center column, goes further toward delivering on tasks:

Above, you can see an example of Snapshot. It appears for the “Ray’s Boathouse” listing. If you were to hover over that, reviews, a map to the restaurant and the ability to book reservations through Open Table would appear to the right, in the center column.

I saw a few other examples last month in an early preview of the new Bing, and I found the implementations pretty impressive. They draw information also from Yelp, FanSnap and other partners.

Unfortunately, Snapshot didn’t seem to be working as I wrote this review, so I can’t explore it more. We’ll have a separate article just on Snapshot in the near future, and we’ll link over from here to that, when it’s ready.

Have You Tried Bing Recently?

Bing’s relaunch comes at a good time. Google’s own effective relaunch, Search Plus Your World last January, put off some tech commentators who felt it shoved too much personal information and too much Google+ification into the listings.

Now comes Bing, with a clean design that looks like the Google of old, with social shoved off to the side where it’s around if you want it but not in your face. On the surface, it seems pleasing.

Add to that the fact that Bing’s search results themselves are good. Indeed, Bing’s blog post is touting that in its own testing, when people are shown search results without the Google or Bing brand attached to them, Bing is winning:

We regularly test unbranded results, removing any trace of Google and Bing branding. When we did this study in January of last year 34% people preferred Bing, while 38% preferred Google.

The same unbranded study now shows that Bing Search results now have a much wider lead over Google’s. When shown unbranded search results 43% prefer Bing results while only 28% prefer Google results.

What this means is that in 3 years we’ve made some real progress in core relevance and search quality, and while search is becoming so much more than just web results, having a rock solid foundation is important for the future of Bing and search more generally.

Here’s a chart of of today’s Bing Search Summit with the trend:

This is Bing’s own testing, of course. I’ve got no doubt Google has its own testing that shows Google beats Bing. Google has also argued that ordinary searchers do like Search Plus Your World. Certainly there’s been no mass abandonment of Google. It’s fair to say the vast majority of its searchers remain happy with the search engine.

It’s also important to note that in real life, the personalization Google does may indeed work better than Bing. I’ve got a lot more testing to do, and results will vary based on each person’s own social connections. But see my sidebar article for more: Head-To-Head: Bing’s Social Search Vs. Google’s Search Plus Your World.

Still, I I’ve been spending a lot more time on Bing over the past week or so, as I’ve tried to assess if Google’s recent Penguin Update made Google’s results better or worse. There’s no way I or anyone can tell with a few searches if that’s the case.

What I do know is that Bing’s results do feel comparable to Google. I even spent the past day using them exclusively instead of Google. I didn’t struggle. I didn’t feel I couldn’t find stuff. A part of me kept feeling like I should run back “home” to Google, but the more I used Bing, the less that became.

I’d say that Bing is even more competitive with Google than ever before. It’s definitely worth another look by anyone, and the competition between the two benefits everyone.

Other outlets are covering today’s Bing news. Techmeme has a round-up here. CNET has some nice background on Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg giving input into the changes. The New York Times has some good perspective on how Bing’s changes fit in with the challenges against Google.

NOTE: Apologies for any typos. Ran short of time for the second proofing I wanted, but I’ll correct later today.

Related Stories

• Meet Bing, Microsoft’s New Search Engine
• Bing, Now With Extra Facebook: See What Your Friends Like & People Search Results
• Bing Goes Search-Retro With Cleaner Look For Results
•  Bing Results Get Localized & Personalized
• Google’s Results Get More Personal With “Search Plus Your World”
• “Don’t Be Evil” Tool — Backed By Facebook & Twitter — Shows Google’s “Search Plus Your World” Can Go Beyond Google+
• FAQ: What’s The Debate About Google’s Search Plus Your World?
• Two Weeks In, Google Says “Search Plus Your World” Going Well, Critics Should Give It Time

Penguin: “A Success”

The goal of any algorithm update is to improve search results. So how’s Penguin been for Google?

“It’s been a success from our standpoint,” Cutts said.

What About Those Weird Results?

Of course, soon after Penguin was released, people quickly started citing examples of odd results. The official Viagra site wasn’t listed, while hacked sites were. An empty web site was listed for “make money online,” and there were reports of other empty sites ranking well. Scraper sites were reported outranking the sites they scraped.

How could Penguin be a success with these types of things happening?

Cutts said that many of these issues existed before Penguin launched and were not caused by the new spam-fighting algorithm.

Indeed, the Viagra issue, which has now been fixed, was a problem before Penguin hit. Penguin didn’t cause it.

False Positives? A Few Cases

How about false positives, people who feel they’ve been unfairly hit by Penguin when they weren’t doing any spam?

“We’ve seen a few cases where we might want to investigate more, but this change hasn’t had the same impact as Panda or Florida,” Cutts said.

The Panda Update was Google’s big update that targeted low-quality spam last year. The Florida Update was a major Google update in 2003 intended to improve its search quality.

I’d agree that both of those seemed to have impacted more sites than Penguin has, based on having watched reactions to all these updates. Not everyone will agree with me, of course. It’s also worth the regular reminder that for any site that “lost” in the rankings, someone gained. You rarely hear from those who gain.

Bottom line, Google seems pretty confident that the Penguin Update is indeed catching people who were spamming, as was intended.

Why Spam Still Gets Through

Certainly when I’ve looked into reports, I’ve often found spam at the core of why someone dropped. But if Penguin is working, why are some sites that are clearly spamming still getting through?

“No algorithm is perfect. While we’d like to achieve perfection, our litmus test is, ‘Do things get better than before?’,” Cutts said.

Cutts also explained that Penguin was designed to be quite precise, to act against pages when there was an extremely high-confidence of spam being involved. The downside is that some spam might get through, but the upside is that you have fewer false positives.

How Can You Recover?

One of the most difficult things with this update is telling people how to recover. Anyone hit by Penguin was deemed to be spamming Google.

In the past, if you spammed Google, you were told to file a reconsideration request. However, Google’s specifically said that reconsideration requests won’t help those hit by Penguin. They’ll recover naturally, Google says, if they clean the spam up.

However, one of the main reasons I’ve seen when looking at sites hit by Penguin seems to be bad linking practices. People have used sponsored WordPress themes, or poor quality reciprocal linking, have purchased links or participated in linking networks, such as those recently targeted by Google.

How do people pull themselves out of these link networks, if perhaps they don’t have control over those links now?

“It is possible to clean things up,” Cutts said, and he suggested people review two videos he’s done on this topic:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Click here to view the embedded video.

“The bottom line is, try to resolve what you can,” Cutts said.

Waiting On Penguin To Update Again

If you do clean things up, how will you know? Ideally, you’ll see your traffic from Google recover, the next time Penguin is updated.

That leads to another important point. Penguin, like Panda, is a filter that gets refreshed from time-to-time. Penguin is not constantly running but rather is used to tag things as spam above-and-beyond Google’s regular spam filtering on a periodic basis.

Is Penguin a site-wide penalty like Panda or page-specific? Cutts wouldn’t say. But given that Panda has site-wide impacts, I think it’s a fair assumption that Penguin works the same.

What that means is that if some of your site is deemed Penguin-like, all of it may suffer. Again, recovery means cleaning up the spam. If you’ve cleaned and still don’t recover, ultimately, you might need to start all over with a fresh site, Cutts said.

New Concerns Over Negative SEO

Before Penguin, talk of “negative SEO” had been ramping up. Since then, it seems to have gotten worse in some places. I’ve seen post-after-post making it sound as if anyone is now in serious danger that some competitor can harm them.

At the core of these fears seems to be a perfect storm of assumptions. Google recently targeted some linking schemes. That caused some people to lose traffic. Google also sent out warnings about sites with “artificial” or “unnatural” links. That generated further concerns in some quarters. Then the Penguin Update hit, which caused more people to lose traffic as they were either hit for link spam or no longer benefited from link spam that was wiped out.

These things made it ripe for people to assume that pointing bad links at a site can hurt it. But as I wrote before, negative SEO concerns aren’t new. They’ve been around for years. Despite this, we’ve not seen it become a major concern.

Google has said it’s difficult for others to harm a site, and that’s indeed seemed to be the case. In particular, pointing bad links at a good site with many other good signals seems to be like trying to infect it with a disease that it has antibodies to. The good stuff outweighs the bad.

Cutts stressed again that negative SEO is rare and hard. “We have done a huge amount of work to try to make sure one person can’t hurt another person,” he said.

Cutts also stressed again what Google said before. Most of the those 700,000 messages to publishers that Google sent out earlier this year were not about bad link networks. Nor were they all suddenly done on the same day. Rather, many sites have had both manual and algorithmic penalties attached to them over time but which were never revealed. Google recently decided to open up about these.

After Negative SEO Campaign, A Link Warning

Of course, new messages do go out, which leads to the case of Dan Thies. His site was targeted by some trying to show that negative SEO works. He received an unnatural link warning after this happened. He also lost some rankings. Is this the proof that negative SEO really works?

Thies told me that his lost rankings were likely due to changes he made himself, when he removed a link across all pages on his site that led back to his home page. After restoring that, he told me, he regained his rankings.

His overall traffic, he said, never got worse. That tends to go against the concerns that negative SEO is a lurking threat, because if it had worked enough to tag his site as part of the Penguin Update, he should have seen a huge drop.

Still, what about link warning? Thies did believe that came because of the negative SEO attempt. That’s scary stuff. He also said he filed three reconsideration requests, which each time returned messages saying that there were no spam actions found. Was he hit with a warning but not one that was also associated with a penalty?

I asked Cutts about the case, but he declined to comment on Thies’s particular situation. He did say that typically a link warning is a precursor to a ranking drop. If the site fixes the problem and does a reconsideration request quickly enough, that might prevent a drop.

Solving The Concerns

I expect we’ll continue to see discussions of negative SEO, with a strong belief by some that it’s a major concern for anyone. I was involved in one discussion over at SEO Book about this that’s well worth a read.

When it’s cheaper to buy links than ever, it’s easy to see why there are concerns. Stories like what happened to Thies or this person, who got a warning after 24,000 links appeared pointing at his site in one day, are worrisome.

Then again, the person’s warning came after he apparently dropped in rankings because of Penguin. So did these negative SEO links actually cause the drop, or was it something else? As is common, it’s hard to tell, because the actual site isn’t provided.

To further confuse matters, some who lost traffic because of Penguin might not be victims of a penalty at all. Rather, Google may have stopped allowing some links to pass credit, if they were deemed to be part of some attempt to just manipulate rankings. If sites were heavily dependent on these artificial links, they’d see a drop just because the link credit was pulled, not because they were hit with a penalty.

I’ve seen a number of people now publicly wishing for a way to “disvow” links pointing at them. Google had no comment about adding such a feature at this time, when I asked about this. I certainly wouldn’t wait around for it now, if you know you were hit by Penguin. I’d do what you can to clean things up.

One good suggestion out of the SEO Book discussion was that Google not penalize sites for bad links pointing at them. Ignore the links, don’t let the links pass credit, but don’t penalize the site. That’s an excellent suggestion for defusing negative SEO concerns, I’d say.

I’d also stress again that from what I’ve seen, negative SEO isn’t really what most hit by Penguin should probably be concerned about. It seems far more likely they were hit by spam they were somehow actively involved in, rather than something a competitor did.

Recovering From Penguin

Our Google Penguin Update Recovery Tips & Advice post from two weeks ago gave some initial advice about dealing with Penguin, and that still holds up. In summary, if you know that you were hit by Penguin (because your traffic dropped on April 24):

• Clean up on-page spam you know you’ve done
• Clean up bad links you know you’re been involved with, as best you can
• Wait for news of a future Penguin Update and see if you recover after it happens
• If it doesn’t, try further cleaning or consider starting over with a fresh site
• If you really believe you were a false positive, file a report as explained here

Just in, by the way, a list of WordPress plug-ins that apparently insert hidden links. If you use some of these, and they have inserted hidden links, that could have caused a penalty.

I’d also say again, take a hard look at your own site. When I’ve looked at sites, it’s painfully easy to find bad link networks they’ve been part of. That doesn’t mean that there’s not spam that’s getting past Penguin. But complaining about what wasn’t caught isn’t a solution to improving your own situation, if you were hit.

Related Articles

• What Is SEO / Search Engine Optimization?
• The Periodic Table Of SEO Ranking Factors
• Search Engine Land’s Guide To SEO
• Google Launches “Penguin Update” Targeting Webspam In Search Results
• Did Penguin Make Google’s Search Results Better Or Worse?
• Penguin’s Reminder: Google Doesn’t Owe You A Living, So Don’t Depend On It
• Penguin Update Peck Your Site By Mistake? Google’s Got A Form For That
• Penguin Update Recovery Tips & Advice

Experiment Confirmed

I noticed these appearing yesterday in my own search results, and Google has confirmed that there’s an experiment happening:

We’re always experimenting with ways to improve search, but we have nothing to announce at this time.

Google does indeed often experiment with new formats, randomly tagging some visitors to see the formats being tested. I apparently was one of those tagged. Most people, however, won’t see some of the examples I’ll share below, as they’re not tagged into the experiment.

I think that will change in the near future, because as I’ll explain at the end, this is one test that I suspect will go fully live soon.

TV Shows

Here’s what I see in a search for Lost:

You can see off to the right-hand side there’s a little summary about the TV show “Lost” that’s drawn from Wikipedia. Cast members are listed, along with a “People also search for” area showing other TV shows that seem related to Lost.

In the previous test last November, this box was called “Sources.” That label is now gone. I’m continuing to call it the “Sources” box for want of a better name.

Actors

Clicking on the links generates a new Google search along with further information. Here’s a close-up of what’s shown for Evangeline Lilly:

Movies

Similar units appear for movies, such as this for in a search for Avengers:

Music & Bands

Musical groups like U2 appear:

People

There’s also extended information about some people, apparently if they are listed in Wikipedia. For example, a search for “dooce” brings up extended information about blogger Heather Armstrong, who is known by that name:

Books

Even books can get a special display:

With Or Without Google+

None of the units are dependent on Google+, nor are they part of Search Plus Your World. They appear whether you’re signed in or not, whether you use Google+ or not. But if you are part of Google+, the units might get additional information.

For example, signed-out, I see this for a search on the TV show New Girl:

Signed-in, since I follow the New Girl page on Google+, information from that appears in a “From your circles” area above the sources box:

New Format For Direct Answers Live For Everyone?

Google is also showing direct answers that come from different sources. Bas van den Beld from State Of Search also appears to be in the test and noted that for a search on “hot fuzz director,” he got a direct answer like this:

This is similar to what you see at Bing for the same search, where the information is disclosed as coming from Freebase, a service that Google owns:

However, these direct answers don’t seem part of the sources experiment. For example, using my Chrome browser in “incognito” mode, which keeps me out of the Google sources test, I can still make these boxes appear, such as this for “avengers cast:”

Is This The “Search Refresh” The WSJ Wrote About?

Direct answers like these have long been part of Google. The formats, however, seem new. The addition of the sources box also suggests that what the Wall Street Journal wrote about earlier this year, about Google offering more direct and semantic answers, is about to happen.

In WSJ Says Big Google Search Changes Coming? Reality Check Time!, I took the WSJ article to task because I thought it overhyped what was likely to happen, which was Google expanding things that it already does.

That still seems to be the case. This will no doubt be a big change to hit Google. But it will also be one of those “evolutionary not revolutionary” type of changes.

If you see these boxes, then you’re one of the few who have also been tagged as part of the experiment. If you don’t, then there’s not much you can do but wait. It seems likely they’ll eventually come for everyone.

Related Articles

• Meet The Google OneBox, Plus Box, Direct Answers & The 10-Pack
• Google Squared Is Now Live
• Up Close With Google Squared & Some Wolfram Alpha Thoughts
• Google Squared Powers Answer Sources & Something Different Refinements
• Google Goes Beyond Answers, Starts Guessing Release Dates
• Google Buys Metaweb To Bolster Answers, Google Squared & Rich Snippets
• Confirmed: Google Testing New “Sources” Display In Search Results
• Google’s Results Get More Personal With “Search Plus Your World”
• Two Weeks In, Google Says “Search Plus Your World” Going Well, Critics Should Give It Time
• WSJ Says Big Google Search Changes Coming? Reality Check Time!

Top News

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012
• Google Sending Warnings About “Artificial” Or “Unnatural” Links
• Australian Court Finds Google Responsible For Misleading Ads Placed By Its Advertisers
• For Social Media Marketers, SEO Is Much More Popular Than PPC
• Google’s March Updates: Anchor Text, Image Search, Navigational Search & More
• Yahoo Confirms 2,000 Employees Getting the Axe
• Meet Project Glass: Google’s Siri For Your Eyes
• Lawmakers Question Whether Google Adequately Reviews Ads Potentially Related To Human Trafficking
• Yahoo In A Fight For Its Life
• Page To Anti-Trust Critics: “Actions” & Google+ Are An Essential Part Of Search
• How “Facebook Search” Could Help Google Escape The Antitrust Noose
• How The Bing Toolbar May Accidentally Submit Private Pages & Ads
• Yahoo’s Re-Organization: Search Stays Alive, At Least On Paper
• comScore: Only Search Engine To See Drop In Queries In March Was Yahoo
• Reports: Google CPCs Continue To Decline And Yahoo/Bing’s Rise While Spend Overall Grows In Q1
• Google Grows Revenues 24% From Last Year, Plans New Class Of Stock
• Microsoft-Yahoo Ad Transition Wrapping Up In UK, Ireland & France
• Microsoft Updates Excel Add-On For Keyword Research And Optimization
• Google’s “Search Plus Your World” Promo Returns
• Yellow Pages Sites Beat Google In Local Data Accuracy Test
• Foursquare Hits 2 Billion Check-ins, 20 Million Users
• Blekko’s Traffic Is Up Almost 400 Percent; Here Are The CEO’s Five Reasons Why
• New adCenter Metric Launched: Share of Voice
• AdWords To Automatically Match For Misspellings, Other Variants
• IAB & PwC: Search Still Tops Online Ad Revenues, And Share Grew In 2011
• 8 Products That Might Be On Yahoo’s Chopping Block
• Dropped In Rankings? Google’s Mistake Over Parked Domains Might Be To Blame
• No, Bing Doesn’t Support Pagination Attributes to Consolidate Pages In A Series
• Home Depot To Correct Misleading Link Request
• Google Redirects Patent Search, Shuts Down Google Related Toolbar, One Pass & Vaccine Finder
• Behind The Scenes In Google’s Battle Against Bad Ads
• Faking A Breadcrumb Trail To Stand Out On Google
• Google Testing “Trusted Stores” Badges On Search AdWords
• Breadcrumb Trails Come To AdWords
• Google Launches “Penguin Update” Targeting Webspam In Search Results
• Google Helps Advertisers Zero In On AdWords Quality Score Problems And Better Organize Their Accounts
• Panda Update 3.5 Is Live: Winners & Losers
• Report: Microsoft Did Shop Bing To Facebook
• Did Penguin Make Google’s Search Results Better Or Worse?
• The Penguin Update: Google’s Webspam Algorithm Gets Official Name
• Google Penguin Update Recovery Tips & Advice
• Google Webmaster Tools Expands Query Data to 90 Days
• Almost 1 Of Every 5 Google Searches Shows Rel=Author In Top 100 Results, Study Shows
• AdWords “Rotate Evenly” Setting To Stop Rotating After 30 Days
• Google “Comparison” Units Get New Look; Change Highlights Paid Inclusion In Some Vertical Search Areas

All Things SEO

• In This Bright SEO Future, Don’t Forget The Basics
• 11 Considerations For International SEO
• This Old Website: What Bob Vila Can Teach You About SEO
• Could DuckDuckGo Be The Biggest Long-Term Threat To Google?

B2B Search Marketing

• Determine The True Value Of Your B2B Search Marketing Program
• Four Steps To Building A Powerful SEO Brain Trust
• 4 Key Recommendations For Social Media Execution In The Industrial Sector
• Runaway Facebook Threads! 5 Tips B2B Community Managers Should Master

Beginner

• The SEO Breakdown: Bank Information Center Site Audit

Blekko

• Blekko’s Traffic Is Up Almost 400 Percent; Here Are The CEO’s Five Reasons Why

Enterprise SEM

• What Is The Real Value Of Branded Search Campaigns?
• Three Questions To Ask When Selecting An Enterprise SEM Tool Provider
• Benefits Of Cross-Channel Analytics For Search Marketers
• The Complete Guide To Bidding On Competitor Brand Names & Trademarked Terms

Enterprise SEO

• How To Get Past 9 Common Enterprise SEO Roadblocks
• How To Prune The Enterprise Link Tree
• How To Structure Your Organization For SEO Success
• Contingency Plans: The One Thing Mike Tyson Wants You To Know About Enterprise SEO

Facebook

• How “Facebook Search” Could Help Google Escape The Antitrust Noose
• Report: Microsoft Did Shop Bing To Facebook

Featured

• Google Launches “Penguin Update” Targeting Webspam In Search Results
• Report: Microsoft Did Shop Bing To Facebook
• The Complete Guide To Bidding On Competitor Brand Names & Trademarked Terms
• Google Penguin Update Recovery Tips & Advice
• Google Webmaster Tools Expands Query Data to 90 Days
• 7 Real Mobile Duplicate Content SEO Issues
• AdWords “Rotate Evenly” Setting To Stop Rotating After 30 Days

Features

• The SEO Breakdown: Bank Information Center Site Audit

Features: Analysis

• For Social Media Marketers, SEO Is Much More Popular Than PPC
• Page To Anti-Trust Critics: “Actions” & Google+ Are An Essential Part Of Search
• How “Facebook Search” Could Help Google Escape The Antitrust Noose
• Blekko’s Traffic Is Up Almost 400 Percent; Here Are The CEO’s Five Reasons Why
• Home Depot To Correct Misleading Link Request
• Google Launches “Penguin Update” Targeting Webspam In Search Results
• Did Penguin Make Google’s Search Results Better Or Worse?
• Google Penguin Update Recovery Tips & Advice
• Google Webmaster Tools Expands Query Data to 90 Days

Features: General

• Watch, Know, Learn: A Rich Online Video Academy
• In Depth: Search Gear For The Titanic Centennial
• Dropped In Rankings? Google’s Mistake Over Parked Domains Might Be To Blame
• Panda Update 3.5 Is Live: Winners & Losers
• Report: Microsoft Did Shop Bing To Facebook

Features: Site Audits

• The SEO Breakdown: Bank Information Center Site Audit

Foursquare

• Foursquare Hits 2 Billion Check-ins, 20 Million Users

Google

• StarCraft Themed Google Easter Egg “Zerg Rush” Calls An Attack On Your Search Results

Google: AdSense

• Group: Google Should Halt All Online Dating Ads Until They’re Sure None Are Fronts For Human Trafficking

Google: AdWords

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012
• Federal And Rhode Island Agencies Divvy Up $500M That Google Forfeited In Pharmaceutical Settlement
• Australian Court Finds Google Responsible For Misleading Ads Placed By Its Advertisers
• How To Run A Pay Per Click Campaign In Multiple Languages Without An Agency
• Lawmakers Question Whether Google Adequately Reviews Ads Potentially Related To Human Trafficking
• AdWords Gets ZIP Code Targeting, Location Insertion, Other Tweaks
• Question Of Whether It’s Legal To Use Trademarks As Keywords Revived On Appeal in Rosetta Stone/Google Case
• AdWords To Automatically Match For Misspellings, Other Variants
• Behind The Scenes In Google’s Battle Against Bad Ads
• Google Testing “Trusted Stores” Badges On Search AdWords
• Breadcrumb Trails Come To AdWords
• Google Helps Advertisers Zero In On AdWords Quality Score Problems And Better Organize Their Accounts
• Google Tweaks Keyword Tool And Traffic Estimator
• AdWords “Rotate Evenly” Setting To Stop Rotating After 30 Days
• Mobile App Marketers Get New Tools From AdWords
• Google “Comparison” Units Get New Look; Change Highlights Paid Inclusion In Some Vertical Search Areas

Google: Algorithm Updates

• Panda Update 3.5 Is Live: Winners & Losers
• Did Penguin Make Google’s Search Results Better Or Worse?
• The Penguin Update: Google’s Webspam Algorithm Gets Official Name

Google: Analytics

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012

Google: Android

• Meet Project Glass: Google’s Siri For Your Eyes
• Looking Back At Larry Page’s First Year At Google’s Helm
• More (Local) Searches Coming From iOS Than Android — Study

Google: Antitrust

• Looking Back At Larry Page’s First Year At Google’s Helm
• How “Facebook Search” Could Help Google Escape The Antitrust Noose

Google: Business Issues

• Looking Back At Larry Page’s First Year At Google’s Helm
• Page To Anti-Trust Critics: “Actions” & Google+ Are An Essential Part Of Search
• Google Grows Revenues 24% From Last Year, Plans New Class Of Stock

Google: Chrome

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012

Google: Critics

• Page To Anti-Trust Critics: “Actions” & Google+ Are An Essential Part Of Search
• How “Facebook Search” Could Help Google Escape The Antitrust Noose

Google: Employees

• Looking Back At Larry Page’s First Year At Google’s Helm
• Google Loses Search PR Director Gabriel Stricker To Twitter

Google: Feeds

• Getting Started With Google Shopping Feeds

Google: General

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012

Google: Gmail

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012

Google: Google+

• Page To Anti-Trust Critics: “Actions” & Google+ Are An Essential Part Of Search

Google: Legal

• Federal And Rhode Island Agencies Divvy Up $500M That Google Forfeited In Pharmaceutical Settlement
• Australian Court Finds Google Responsible For Misleading Ads Placed By Its Advertisers
• Looking Back At Larry Page’s First Year At Google’s Helm
• Lawmakers Question Whether Google Adequately Reviews Ads Potentially Related To Human Trafficking
• Group: Google Should Halt All Online Dating Ads Until They’re Sure None Are Fronts For Human Trafficking
• How “Facebook Search” Could Help Google Escape The Antitrust Noose
• Question Of Whether It’s Legal To Use Trademarks As Keywords Revived On Appeal in Rosetta Stone/Google Case

Google: Logos

• Eadweard J. Muybridge 182nd Birthday Google Logo
• Google Grew Their Own Earth Day Logo
• Google Zipper Logo Celebrates Birthday Of Inventor Gideon Sundback

Google: Maps & Local

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012
• Google Maps Traffic Estimates Even For Many Roads
• AdWords Gets ZIP Code Targeting, Location Insertion, Other Tweaks
• Yellow Pages Sites Beat Google In Local Data Accuracy Test
• Microsoft Makes Venue Maps More Visible On Bing
• Analyst: Mobile To Overtake PC For Local Search By 2015
• More (Local) Searches Coming From iOS Than Android — Study

Google: Marketing

• Google’s “Search Plus Your World” Promo Returns

Google: Mobile

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012
• Meet Project Glass: Google’s Siri For Your Eyes
• Analyst: Mobile To Overtake PC For Local Search By 2015
• More (Local) Searches Coming From iOS Than Android — Study
• 7 Real Mobile Duplicate Content SEO Issues
• Mobile App Marketers Get New Tools From AdWords

Google: Other

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012

Google: Outside US

• How To Run A Pay Per Click Campaign In Multiple Languages Without An Agency
• Does Booming International Search Mask A Google Decline?
• Google Street View Images Now Online In Israel

Google: Parodies

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012

Google: Partnerships

• Google “Comparison” Units Get New Look; Change Highlights Paid Inclusion In Some Vertical Search Areas

Google: Patents

• Google Redirects Patent Search, Shuts Down Google Related Toolbar, One Pass & Vaccine Finder

Google: Penguin Update

• The Penguin Update: Google’s Webspam Algorithm Gets Official Name
• Google Penguin Update Recovery Tips & Advice
• Penguin Update Peck Your Site By Mistake? Google’s Got A Form For That

Google: Personalized Search

• Page To Anti-Trust Critics: “Actions” & Google+ Are An Essential Part Of Search

Google: Project Glass Eyeglasses

• Meet Project Glass: Google’s Siri For Your Eyes

Google: Rich Snippets

• New: Google Rich Snippet Tool Allows HTML Input & Product Snippets Go Global
• Faking A Breadcrumb Trail To Stand Out On Google
• Almost 1 Of Every 5 Google Searches Shows Rel=Author In Top 100 Results, Study Shows

Google: Search Plus Your World

• Page To Anti-Trust Critics: “Actions” & Google+ Are An Essential Part Of Search
• Google’s “Search Plus Your World” Promo Returns

Google: Security

• Google Sent 20,000+ Hacked Notification Messages To Webmasters Today

Google: SEO

• Google Sending Warnings About “Artificial” Or “Unnatural” Links
• Google’s March Updates: Anchor Text, Image Search, Navigational Search & More
• Google: No, We Don’t Use Akismet To Catch Link Spam
• New: Google Rich Snippet Tool Allows HTML Input & Product Snippets Go Global
• Dropped In Rankings? Google’s Mistake Over Parked Domains Might Be To Blame
• Home Depot To Correct Misleading Link Request
• Infographic: Goldilocks SEO, Getting Search Engine Optimization “Just Right”
• Google Launches “Penguin Update” Targeting Webspam In Search Results
• Site Performance, Subscriber Stats & Robots.txt Tool Removed From Google Webmaster Tools
• Panda Update 3.5 Is Live: Winners & Losers
• Did Penguin Make Google’s Search Results Better Or Worse?
• The Penguin Update: Google’s Webspam Algorithm Gets Official Name
• Google Penguin Update Recovery Tips & Advice

Google: Sitelinks

• Getting Started With Google Shopping Feeds

Google: Street View

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012
• Google Street View Images Now Online In Israel

Google: Toolbar

• Google Redirects Patent Search, Shuts Down Google Related Toolbar, One Pass & Vaccine Finder

Google: User Interface

• An Easter Egg For The Qingming Festival On Google

Google: Web Search

• Google’s March Updates: Anchor Text, Image Search, Navigational Search & More
• An Easter Egg For The Qingming Festival On Google
• Page To Anti-Trust Critics: “Actions” & Google+ Are An Essential Part Of Search
• comScore: Only Search Engine To See Drop In Queries In March Was Yahoo
• Google Sent 20,000+ Hacked Notification Messages To Webmasters Today
• Dropped In Rankings? Google’s Mistake Over Parked Domains Might Be To Blame
• Google Redirects Patent Search, Shuts Down Google Related Toolbar, One Pass & Vaccine Finder
• Google’s Cutts Explains How Google Search Works
• Google Launches “Penguin Update” Targeting Webspam In Search Results
• More (Local) Searches Coming From iOS Than Android — Study
• Panda Update 3.5 Is Live: Winners & Losers
• Did Penguin Make Google’s Search Results Better Or Worse?
• The Penguin Update: Google’s Webspam Algorithm Gets Official Name
• Almost 1 Of Every 5 Google Searches Shows Rel=Author In Top 100 Results, Study Shows

Google: Webmaster Central

• Google Sending Warnings About “Artificial” Or “Unnatural” Links
• Google: No, We Don’t Use Akismet To Catch Link Spam
• Google Sent 20,000+ Hacked Notification Messages To Webmasters Today
• Site Performance, Subscriber Stats & Robots.txt Tool Removed From Google Webmaster Tools
• Google Webmaster Tools Expands Query Data to 90 Days

How To

• The SEO Breakdown: Bank Information Center Site Audit

How To: Mobile Marketing

• Mobile SEO Is A Must For Acquiring Mobile Shoppers
• 7 Real Mobile Duplicate Content SEO Issues

How To: PPC

• How To Develop A Keyword Plan
• The Complete Guide To Bidding On Competitor Brand Names & Trademarked Terms

How To: SEM

• The Complete Guide To Bidding On Competitor Brand Names & Trademarked Terms

How To: SEO

• How To Develop A Keyword Plan
• The SEO Breakdown: Bank Information Center Site Audit
• 7 Real Mobile Duplicate Content SEO Issues

In House Search Marketing

• Do It Yourself A/B Testing
• The Most Destructive Lie In Search Marketing

Infographics

• Infographic: Goldilocks SEO, Getting Search Engine Optimization “Just Right”

Keywords & Content

• How To Develop A Keyword Plan
• 9 More Content Development Ideas For Increased Visibility
• What’s In A Word? The Critical Role Of Keyword Selection For Business Growth

Legal: Trademarks

• Question Of Whether It’s Legal To Use Trademarks As Keywords Revived On Appeal in Rosetta Stone/Google Case
• The Complete Guide To Bidding On Competitor Brand Names & Trademarked Terms

Link Building: General

• Google Sending Warnings About “Artificial” Or “Unnatural” Links
• Home Depot To Correct Misleading Link Request

Link Building: Paid Links

• Google Sending Warnings About “Artificial” Or “Unnatural” Links

Link Week

• Using The Brown M&M Technique To Build Links
• Signs Of Linking Over-Optimization
• Will Pitching Guest Posts Be The Death of Marketers?
• Six Degrees Of SEO Bacon & B2B Link Building Q&A

Local Search

• Four Key Reasons To Reconsider Today’s Yellow Pages For Local Marketing
• 5 “Local” Search Engines You Should Be Targeting
• Five Key Learnings From A Local Marketing Success Story

Microsoft & Yahoo Search Deal

• Microsoft-Yahoo Ad Transition Wrapping Up In UK, Ireland & France

Microsoft: adCenter

• AdCenter Launches Training Hub To Grow Ranks Of Accredited Professionals
• Microsoft-Yahoo Ad Transition Wrapping Up In UK, Ireland & France
• Microsoft Updates Excel Add-On For Keyword Research And Optimization
• New adCenter Metric Launched: Share of Voice

Microsoft: APIs

• Bing Search API No Longer Free

Microsoft: Bing

• comScore: Only Search Engine To See Drop In Queries In March Was Yahoo
• Bing Search API No Longer Free
• Microsoft Updates Excel Add-On For Keyword Research And Optimization
• Microsoft Makes Venue Maps More Visible On Bing
• Report: Microsoft Did Shop Bing To Facebook

Microsoft: Bing Maps & Local

• Microsoft Makes Venue Maps More Visible On Bing
• Analyst: Mobile To Overtake PC For Local Search By 2015

Microsoft: Bing Mobile

• Analyst: Mobile To Overtake PC For Local Search By 2015

Microsoft: Bing SEO

• How The Bing Toolbar May Accidentally Submit Private Pages & Ads
• No, Bing Doesn’t Support Pagination Attributes to Consolidate Pages In A Series

Microsoft: Outside US

• Microsoft-Yahoo Ad Transition Wrapping Up In UK, Ireland & France

Mobile Search

• For Mobile SEO Ask “What Do Mobile Searchers Need?”
• Smartphone Vs. Mobile-Only Google Indexing
• Mobile SEO Is A Must For Acquiring Mobile Shoppers
• 7 Real Mobile Duplicate Content SEO Issues

Multinational Search

• How To Run A Pay Per Click Campaign In Multiple Languages Without An Agency
• Stop Blaming IT! How Communication Could Improve From The SEO Side
• Does Booming International Search Mask A Google Decline?
• New Search Engine Attrakt Focuses On Curated Content

Paid Search

• Simple Tips To Make Miracles Happen In Your PPC Campaigns
• Consider The Ends To Justify The Means In PPC
• 5 Highly Effective Landing Page Tips
• The Who, When & Why Of PPC Account Audits

Panda Update News

• Panda Update 3.5 Is Live: Winners & Losers

Panda Update Winners & Losers

• Panda Update 3.5 Is Live: Winners & Losers

Search & Analytics

• Using Data To Better Understand Tablet Consumer Behavior
• Conversion Rate Optimization In Paid Search: Why Click Through Rate Matters
• Understanding Your Analytics Versus Campaign Management Tools

Search & Conversion

• Hack Your Web Developer’s Questionnaire For Higher Conversion
• Remarketing For Conversion: The Long Way Rocks!
• 5 Colorful Sketches On Conversion Optimization

Search & Display

• What Does Big Data Mean To You?
• Four Things You Need To Know About Search Retargeting

Search & Retail

• Google Becomes Answer Engine With Semantic Technology – Great News For Retailers
• Getting Started With Google Shopping Feeds

Search & Social

• Why Pinterest Is NOT Your SEO Miracle Worker
• Social Search: Dead On Arrival? Or On Life Support?
• How To Prioritize The Long Tail With Twitter

Search & Society: April Fool’s

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012

Search & Usability

• How To Understand Keywords In Searcher Context

Search Ads: General

• For Social Media Marketers, SEO Is Much More Popular Than PPC

Search Ads: Paid Inclusion

• Google “Comparison” Units Get New Look; Change Highlights Paid Inclusion In Some Vertical Search Areas

Search Engines: Disasters

• In Depth: Search Gear For The Titanic Centennial

Search Engines: Government Search Engines

• The 1940 U.S. Census: Soon, A Searcher’s Treasure Trove

Search Engines: Kids Search Engines

• Watch, Know, Learn: A Rich Online Video Academy

Search Engines: Maps & Local Search Engines

• Yellow Pages Sites Beat Google In Local Data Accuracy Test
• AT&T Interactive: More Than 30 Percent Of Searches On Network Are Mobile
• More (Local) Searches Coming From iOS Than Android — Study
• Wolfram Alpha Gets Into Local Search — Very Badly

Search Engines: Mobile Search Engines

• AT&T Interactive: More Than 30 Percent Of Searches On Network Are Mobile
• More (Local) Searches Coming From iOS Than Android — Study
• 7 Real Mobile Duplicate Content SEO Issues

Search Engines: Other Search Engines

• Watch, Know, Learn: A Rich Online Video Academy
• In Depth: Search Gear For The Titanic Centennial
• New Search Engine Attrakt Focuses On Curated Content

Search Engines: Outside USA

• Does Booming International Search Mask A Google Decline?
• New Search Engine Attrakt Focuses On Curated Content

Search Engines: People Search

• The 1940 U.S. Census: Soon, A Searcher’s Treasure Trove

Search Engines: Social Search Engines

• New Search Engine Attrakt Focuses On Curated Content

Search Engines: Video Search Engines

• Watch, Know, Learn: A Rich Online Video Academy

Search Engines: Wolfram Alpha

• Wolfram Alpha Gets Into Local Search — Very Badly

Search In Pictures

• Search In Pics: Google Halfpipe, Gooogle Cars & The Bing Train

Search Marketing Toolbox

• Clickable’s Widget Dashboard: Expansion Into Cross-Channel Intelligence

Search Marketing: General

• For Social Media Marketers, SEO Is Much More Popular Than PPC
• Do It Yourself A/B Testing
• Reports: Google CPCs Continue To Decline And Yahoo/Bing’s Rise While Spend Overall Grows In Q1
• Google “Comparison” Units Get New Look; Change Highlights Paid Inclusion In Some Vertical Search Areas

Search Marketing: Mobile

• Mobile SEO Is A Must For Acquiring Mobile Shoppers

Search Marketing: Multinational

• Does Booming International Search Mask A Google Decline?

SEM Industry: Conferences

• Stay on the Cutting Edge of SEO: Attend SMX Advanced June 5-6
• SMX Advanced: Hotel Alert
• Elevate Your Paid Campaign ROI – Attend SMX Advanced June 5-6
• See Who’s Speaking at SMX Advanced – Only 70 Tickets Left

SEM Industry: General

• SEM / PPC Jobs Big In New York, Chicago, San Jose, Austin & Seattle

SEM Industry: Stats

• For Social Media Marketers, SEO Is Much More Popular Than PPC
• SEM / PPC Jobs Big In New York, Chicago, San Jose, Austin & Seattle

SEM Tools: Web Analytics

• Do It Yourself A/B Testing

SEO – Search Engine Optimization

• How To Develop A Keyword Plan
• The SEO Breakdown: Bank Information Center Site Audit

SEO: Duplicate Content

• No, Bing Doesn’t Support Pagination Attributes to Consolidate Pages In A Series

SEO: General

• For Social Media Marketers, SEO Is Much More Popular Than PPC
• The SEO Breakdown: Bank Information Center Site Audit
• Infographic: Goldilocks SEO, Getting Search Engine Optimization “Just Right”

SEO: Mobile Search

• For Mobile SEO Ask “What Do Mobile Searchers Need?”
• Mobile SEO Is A Must For Acquiring Mobile Shoppers
• 7 Real Mobile Duplicate Content SEO Issues

SEO: Spamming

• Google Sending Warnings About “Artificial” Or “Unnatural” Links
• Faking A Breadcrumb Trail To Stand Out On Google
• Google Launches “Penguin Update” Targeting Webspam In Search Results

SEO: Titles & Descriptions

• The SEO Breakdown: Bank Information Center Site Audit

SEO: Writing & Body Copy

• The SEO Breakdown: Bank Information Center Site Audit

SMX & SMN Alerts

• Stay on the Cutting Edge of SEO: Attend SMX Advanced June 5-6
• Elevate Your Paid Campaign ROI – Attend SMX Advanced June 5-6
• Free webcast: Google+ and Social’s Impact on Search
• See Who’s Speaking at SMX Advanced – Only 70 Tickets Left
• Webinar, Thursday, April 26: Display Audience Targeting
• Big Data Management: Forensics – SMN webcast next Wednesday, May 2

Social Media Marketing

• For Social Media Marketers, SEO Is Much More Popular Than PPC

Stats: comScore

• comScore: Only Search Engine To See Drop In Queries In March Was Yahoo
• Blekko’s Traffic Is Up Almost 400 Percent; Here Are The CEO’s Five Reasons Why
• Analyst: Mobile To Overtake PC For Local Search By 2015

Stats: General

• For Social Media Marketers, SEO Is Much More Popular Than PPC

Stats: History

• IAB & PwC: Search Still Tops Online Ad Revenues, And Share Grew In 2011

Stats: Popularity

• Blekko’s Traffic Is Up Almost 400 Percent; Here Are The CEO’s Five Reasons Why

Stats: Relevancy

• Did Penguin Make Google’s Search Results Better Or Worse?

Stats: Search Behavior

• More (Local) Searches Coming From iOS Than Android — Study

Stats: Size

• Analyst: Mobile To Overtake PC For Local Search By 2015

Stats: Spend Projections

• Reports: Google CPCs Continue To Decline And Yahoo/Bing’s Rise While Spend Overall Grows In Q1
• IAB & PwC: Search Still Tops Online Ad Revenues, And Share Grew In 2011

Twitter

• Google Loses Search PR Director Gabriel Stricker To Twitter

Twitter: Business Issues

• Google Loses Search PR Director Gabriel Stricker To Twitter

Yahoo

• Yahoo In A Fight For Its Life

Yahoo: Answers

• 8 Products That Might Be On Yahoo’s Chopping Block

Yahoo: Business Issues

• Yahoo Confirms 2,000 Employees Getting the Axe
• Yahoo In A Fight For Its Life
• Yahoo’s Re-Organization: Search Stays Alive, At Least On Paper
• Yahoo Q1: Revenue Beats Expectations, Search Up 8 Percent
• 8 Products That Might Be On Yahoo’s Chopping Block

Yahoo: Employees

• Yahoo Confirms 2,000 Employees Getting the Axe
• Yahoo In A Fight For Its Life

Yahoo: Flickr

• Google’s Gags Go Worldwide For April Fool’s Day 2012
• 8 Products That Might Be On Yahoo’s Chopping Block

Yahoo: General

• Yahoo In A Fight For Its Life

Yahoo: Outside US

• Microsoft-Yahoo Ad Transition Wrapping Up In UK, Ireland & France

Yahoo: Pipes

• 8 Products That Might Be On Yahoo’s Chopping Block

Yahoo: Search

• Yahoo Confirms 2,000 Employees Getting the Axe
• Yahoo In A Fight For Its Life
• Yahoo’s Re-Organization: Search Stays Alive, At Least On Paper
• comScore: Only Search Engine To See Drop In Queries In March Was Yahoo
• Yahoo Q1: Revenue Beats Expectations, Search Up 8 Percent

Yahoo: Search Ads

• Microsoft-Yahoo Ad Transition Wrapping Up In UK, Ireland & France

Yahoo: Translation

• 8 Products That Might Be On Yahoo’s Chopping Block

Yelp

• Yelpy Insights: Yelp Adds Two New Search Filters, Looks To Add More