<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>searchengineland.com &#187; Rich Rosen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/author/richrosen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:40:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Five Rules For Running A Successful Pay-Per-Call Campaign</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/five-rules-for-running-a-successful-pay-per-call-campaign-27899</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/five-rules-for-running-a-successful-pay-per-call-campaign-27899#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Rosen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How To: SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Ads: Pay Per Call]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=27899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although it&#8217;s been around for years, pay-per-call advertising may be finally hitting its stride.  Greg Sterling, a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land, recently wrote: 
 We&#8217;ve long known that calls are much more valuable than clicks to small businesses in particular, but also to many larger entities with call-center sales operations. However&#8230; it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it&#8217;s been around for years, pay-per-call advertising may be finally hitting its stride.  Greg Sterling, a Contributing Editor at <a href="http://searchengineland.com">Search Engine Land</a>, recently wrote: </p>
<blockquote><p> We&#8217;ve long known that calls are much more valuable than clicks to small businesses in particular, but also to many larger entities with call-center sales operations. However&#8230; it&#8217;s taken PPCall much longer to get going than I originally anticipated. </p></blockquote>
<p>Sterling sees pay-per-call growth in traditional media and mobile. He also  notes that pay-per-call programs are now increasingly being used in print Yellow Page directories such as AT&#038;T which just <a href="http://localmobilesearch.net/news/yellow-pages/att-adds-video-ppcall-ads-iphone-app"> announced pay-per-call programs via the YPmobile App for iPhone and iTouch </a>. Merchant Circle also recently announced pay-per-acquisition pricing &#8211; including pay-per-call. </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not just AT&#038;T and Merchant Circle.  Other traditional yellow page publishes are renewing interest, and venture rounds by MojoPages, Balihoo, RingRevenue, as well as the <a href="http://searchengineland.com/a-services-open-table-redbeacon-wins-tc50s-top-prize-25895">TechCrunch50 launch of Redbeacon and Yext</a> show that there is a growing supply of pay per call offerings coming into the mobile local search market.  </p>
<p>In fact, I just read a blog post lamenting the poor service delivered to a pay-per-call advertiser.  The merchant&mdash;who was irate that he received wrong number calls and was charged inappropriately&mdash;reminded me of what can go wrong with an advertiser&#8217;s pay-per-call campaign. </p>
<p>All of this brings home a point: as more and more search engine marketers, publishers and others in the mobile local search ecosystem are discovering, pay-per-call is not as easy as it appears on the surface. If your local business is being pitched by a provider who just provisions a few tracking numbers, begins charging for calls and then expects to roll in the dough, you need to be prepared to ask a few hard questions.  </p>
<p><b>Five rules for every local merchant interested in pay-per-call pricing</b></p>
<p><b>Make a good first impression.</b> If the first calls received from your campaign are wrong numbers look out. Despite best intentions, assigned numbers (necessary of course for pay-per-call), are never entirely clean. Before a number is assigned, your provider should be monitoring for wrong number calls. </p>
<p><b>Be selective.</b> Pay-per-call can succeed for local advertisers focused on phone lead generation, but it may not be right for your business. Your business should not rely on walk-in traffic (retail); the cost of sale cannot be too low, or too high; and sales generally need to be closed every few calls (high sales to call ratio). You are an ideal pay-per-call advertising candidate if you have advertised in the yellow pages, newspapers, FSIs, Valpak or other mailers, radio or local TV. Business-to-business (B2B) advertisers or niche merchants are not typically good candidates for pay-per-call. </p>
<p><b>Be prepared to serve your callers.</b> I founded my company on the premise that pay-per-call must benefit the consumer, merchant and publisher.  Ten dollars per call may be a great deal for you, but your business needs to be properly staffed and trained to answer the phone. Without a connection to your helpful, available staff,  the consumer is not served. If your business does not have the infrastructure to serve clients by phone, pay-per-call may not be for you. </p>
<p><b>Be able to close a sale or make an appointment by phone.</b> I had a client&mdash;a direct mail publisher&mdash;whose advertiser complained that they did not make any sales as a result of the pay-per-call leads. We were recording the calls (with permission) for the client and discovered that the leads from the publisher were good, but the advertiser&#8217;s staff couldn&#8217;t sell. </p>
<p><b>Calls prove return on advertising investment (ROI) even without pay-per-call pricing</b>. If pay-per-call isn&#8217;t right for your business, don&#8217;t give up on the numerous benefits of tracking and routing calls.</p>
<p>Look for innovators and leaders when comparing pay-per-call offerings. <a href="http://www.yext.com/">Yext</a> demonstrated an example of this innovative thinking at TechCrunch50. Leakage and dirty calls are a real problem with pay-per-call. Yext is using analytics to examine key words for relevance and filter out junk calls.</p>
<p>The TechCruch50 winner, <a href="http://www.redbeacon.com/">Redbeacon</a>&mdash;while not focused on pay per call, or calls at all&mdash;is trying to solve the problem of merchant availability. This is closely related to pay-per-call (see Rule #3). If your staff is not available to respond to a call, the consumer is not served. The merchant who answers the phone is generally more available than the merchant that does not&mdash;especially over a series of calls.</p>
<p>Successful implementation of pay-per-call requires bottom up thinking with the same new product development rigor as any major new advertising or lead generation product. The next generation of Pay-per-call 2.0 insures a high level of satisfaction with the quality of your callers (consumers) by including detailed analytics and reporting to identify repeat calls by caller ID and other calling patterns; category management to deliver the best leads to the right merchants; pricing models that optimize value; and finally advanced, real-time call routing applications to deal wrong numbers, vendors and other unwanted calls. </p>
<p>Despite several years of building expectation, pay-per-call is still a relatively new pricing model within mobile local search.  Providers entering this market must be prepared for a fairly steep learning curve and merchants need to be prepared to ask the right questions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/five-rules-for-running-a-successful-pay-per-call-campaign-27899/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
