<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bartz Continues Torpedoing Yahoo Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/bartz-continues-torpedoing-yahoo-search-20705/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/bartz-continues-torpedoing-yahoo-search-20705</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:37:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nickstamoulis</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/bartz-continues-torpedoing-yahoo-search-20705/comment-page-1#comment-5831</link>
		<dc:creator>nickstamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=20705#comment-5831</guid>
		<description>This is typical Yahoo!, if they wanted to they could be very competitive in search, but I think Bartz might be trying to establish Yahoo! as a different type of web portal (not sure what type though)...anyway, she could be hammering search for a reason, maybe Yahoo! has bigger plans to leverage with is significant audience.

For fun, I just added Yahoo! vs. Facebook vs. Google in Compete and found this:
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/yahoo.com+facebook.com+google.com/

Interesting to see the amount of visitors (not search volume) Yahoo! has?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is typical Yahoo!, if they wanted to they could be very competitive in search, but I think Bartz might be trying to establish Yahoo! as a different type of web portal (not sure what type though)&#8230;anyway, she could be hammering search for a reason, maybe Yahoo! has bigger plans to leverage with is significant audience.</p>
<p>For fun, I just added Yahoo! vs. Facebook vs. Google in Compete and found this:<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/yahoo.com+facebook.com+google.com/" rel="nofollow">http://siteanalytics.compete.com/yahoo.com+facebook.com+google.com/</a></p>
<p>Interesting to see the amount of visitors (not search volume) Yahoo! has?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomviolin</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/bartz-continues-torpedoing-yahoo-search-20705/comment-page-1#comment-5829</link>
		<dc:creator>tomviolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=20705#comment-5829</guid>
		<description>It sure is disappointing to hear the CEO of such a high-profile company display no clear vision of the company&#039;s focus, direction, and mission.  That&#039;s the CEO&#039;s JOB, after all.

I used to poo-poo stuff like &quot;vision statements&quot; as management bureaucracy.  But, done right, it can do wonders.  [Done wrong, like including the words &quot;customer-focused&quot; (why on earth a company WOULDN&#039;T be focused on their customers is beyond me, but I digress...) it is a disaster.]

Did anyone read the book &quot;Microserfs&quot;?  It is a fictional novel, and it in part depicts life at Microsoft in the early 90&#039;s.  At that time, Microsoft was on the upswing, and Apple was stagnant, to say the least.  The main characters were Microsoft employees who all admired Apple&#039;s ideas and history, but realized that they were failing because they had &quot;no Bill&quot; [Gates], i.e., no charismatic CEO to lead them.  Well, Apple eventually got back their charismatic frontman Steve Jobs, and look what happened.

Yahoo needs Bartz like they need a hole in the head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure is disappointing to hear the CEO of such a high-profile company display no clear vision of the company&#8217;s focus, direction, and mission.  That&#8217;s the CEO&#8217;s JOB, after all.</p>
<p>I used to poo-poo stuff like &#8220;vision statements&#8221; as management bureaucracy.  But, done right, it can do wonders.  [Done wrong, like including the words "customer-focused" (why on earth a company WOULDN'T be focused on their customers is beyond me, but I digress...) it is a disaster.]</p>
<p>Did anyone read the book &#8220;Microserfs&#8221;?  It is a fictional novel, and it in part depicts life at Microsoft in the early 90&#8217;s.  At that time, Microsoft was on the upswing, and Apple was stagnant, to say the least.  The main characters were Microsoft employees who all admired Apple&#8217;s ideas and history, but realized that they were failing because they had &#8220;no Bill&#8221; [Gates], i.e., no charismatic CEO to lead them.  Well, Apple eventually got back their charismatic frontman Steve Jobs, and look what happened.</p>
<p>Yahoo needs Bartz like they need a hole in the head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagar Manikpure</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/bartz-continues-torpedoing-yahoo-search-20705/comment-page-1#comment-5819</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagar Manikpure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=20705#comment-5819</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a pity that Yahoo wants to drop out of the Search race. I hope they don&#039;t. Although, I love Google I would also love to have some competition in this space. One area where Yahoo isn&#039;t doing enough  - 

Use your content to differentiate - Content and intelligence on the content (when created, by who, key concepts) is key to creating a good search result page.  Yahoo creates huge high quality content all over the world that covers a range of topics. They know more about this content than anybody else..its time they leveraged it for their search results.

Think - Yahoo answers. answers.yahoo.com probably is the second most occurring site on Google result pages (after wikipedia)...why can&#039;t Yahoo use this rich content, understand more about it (good answer vs. bad answer, category information and so on.) to create a more relevant and a better presented result entry for Yahoo search queries that deserve them.

Simply, expand them to other Yahoo entities - Local, Autos, Travel, Sports...Moreover, Yahoo also has regional versions in several countries that can make it &quot;contextually relevant&quot; (pardon the buzzword).

I pray, they perceive this less as an opportunity to cross sell their products and more as a way to strengthen their result quality.

Yahoo..please don&#039;t give up...at least not just yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pity that Yahoo wants to drop out of the Search race. I hope they don&#8217;t. Although, I love Google I would also love to have some competition in this space. One area where Yahoo isn&#8217;t doing enough  &#8211; </p>
<p>Use your content to differentiate &#8211; Content and intelligence on the content (when created, by who, key concepts) is key to creating a good search result page.  Yahoo creates huge high quality content all over the world that covers a range of topics. They know more about this content than anybody else..its time they leveraged it for their search results.</p>
<p>Think &#8211; Yahoo answers. answers.yahoo.com probably is the second most occurring site on Google result pages (after wikipedia)&#8230;why can&#8217;t Yahoo use this rich content, understand more about it (good answer vs. bad answer, category information and so on.) to create a more relevant and a better presented result entry for Yahoo search queries that deserve them.</p>
<p>Simply, expand them to other Yahoo entities &#8211; Local, Autos, Travel, Sports&#8230;Moreover, Yahoo also has regional versions in several countries that can make it &#8220;contextually relevant&#8221; (pardon the buzzword).</p>
<p>I pray, they perceive this less as an opportunity to cross sell their products and more as a way to strengthen their result quality.</p>
<p>Yahoo..please don&#8217;t give up&#8230;at least not just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimContext</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/bartz-continues-torpedoing-yahoo-search-20705/comment-page-1#comment-5816</link>
		<dc:creator>JimContext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=20705#comment-5816</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s really a shame is that Yahoo! actually has a good search product that really could be competitive if they were able to reposition themselves in the marketplace. I&#039;m also definitely in agreement with you that a lot of things Bartz says are cringe-worthy if you&#039;re at all concerned with the future of Yahoo search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s really a shame is that Yahoo! actually has a good search product that really could be competitive if they were able to reposition themselves in the marketplace. I&#8217;m also definitely in agreement with you that a lot of things Bartz says are cringe-worthy if you&#8217;re at all concerned with the future of Yahoo search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
