<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing Adds Twitter Smart Answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/bing-adds-twitter-smart-answers-21823/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/bing-adds-twitter-smart-answers-21823</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: m.orliac</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/bing-adds-twitter-smart-answers-21823/comment-page-1#comment-6119</link>
		<dc:creator>m.orliac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=21823#comment-6119</guid>
		<description>I agree, and giving priority to the &quot;cool&quot;factor is not going to help getting better search results considering the amount of spam generated by Twitter. It is only going to make it more difficult for the Bing team!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, and giving priority to the &#8220;cool&#8221;factor is not going to help getting better search results considering the amount of spam generated by Twitter. It is only going to make it more difficult for the Bing team!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickstamoulis</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/bing-adds-twitter-smart-answers-21823/comment-page-1#comment-6104</link>
		<dc:creator>nickstamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=21823#comment-6104</guid>
		<description>This is great news for Bing but they should have gone for less of the &quot;cool&quot; factor and more on improving their search/decision engine product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news for Bing but they should have gone for less of the &#8220;cool&#8221; factor and more on improving their search/decision engine product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsantangelo</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/bing-adds-twitter-smart-answers-21823/comment-page-1#comment-6094</link>
		<dc:creator>johnsantangelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=21823#comment-6094</guid>
		<description>You know what else would be a smart move? Making the Bing search results not suck so hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what else would be a smart move? Making the Bing search results not suck so hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarriBugbee</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/bing-adds-twitter-smart-answers-21823/comment-page-1#comment-6090</link>
		<dc:creator>CarriBugbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=21823#comment-6090</guid>
		<description>So, Bing caters to the Twitterati, which arguably includes early adopter and digital influentials. Smart idea. I know I&#039;ll be experimenting with Bing more often now. I&#039;m eager to find out just who Bing deems &quot;prominent and prolific.&quot; :-)

@CarriBugbee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Bing caters to the Twitterati, which arguably includes early adopter and digital influentials. Smart idea. I know I&#8217;ll be experimenting with Bing more often now. I&#8217;m eager to find out just who Bing deems &#8220;prominent and prolific.&#8221; :-)</p>
<p>@CarriBugbee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
