<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Google Stay In China And Still Save Face?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/can-google-stay-in-china-and-still-save-face-37900/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/can-google-stay-in-china-and-still-save-face-37900</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:39:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Winooski</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/can-google-stay-in-china-and-still-save-face-37900/comment-page-1#comment-9155</link>
		<dc:creator>Winooski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=37900#comment-9155</guid>
		<description>&quot;Given that the Chinese aren’t going to back down, how might Google remain in China and still save face in the West?&quot;

Stop doing biz in China as &quot;Google&quot;, then start doing biz there as, say, &quot;Not Google&quot;. Seriously. (Well, not the actualy name, but the concept.) They could have their cake and eat it, too: Tell the world that they took a principled stand and ceased to offer Google services there, then offer China identical services with a different brand name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Given that the Chinese aren’t going to back down, how might Google remain in China and still save face in the West?&#8221;</p>
<p>Stop doing biz in China as &#8220;Google&#8221;, then start doing biz there as, say, &#8220;Not Google&#8221;. Seriously. (Well, not the actualy name, but the concept.) They could have their cake and eat it, too: Tell the world that they took a principled stand and ceased to offer Google services there, then offer China identical services with a different brand name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford Bryan</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/can-google-stay-in-china-and-still-save-face-37900/comment-page-1#comment-9138</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=37900#comment-9138</guid>
		<description>Industrial espionage is a fairly common practice in China. The U.S. government does its fair share also. Given that Google&#039;s SVP-David Drummond is a lawyer, his statement was just rhetoric, designed  to apply as much pressure as possible on the Chinese government. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a matter of saving face. Besides, there are no words in Chinese for \yes\ or \no\. This is classic Yin and Yang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Industrial espionage is a fairly common practice in China. The U.S. government does its fair share also. Given that Google&#8217;s SVP-David Drummond is a lawyer, his statement was just rhetoric, designed  to apply as much pressure as possible on the Chinese government. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a matter of saving face. Besides, there are no words in Chinese for \yes\ or \no\. This is classic Yin and Yang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.248 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 10:51:01 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
