<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Search Popularity Ratings: Google Climbs &amp; Good News For Live.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/comparing-search-popularity-ratings-google-climbs-good-news-for-livecom-10805/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/comparing-search-popularity-ratings-google-climbs-good-news-for-livecom-10805</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:49:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dugdale</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/comparing-search-popularity-ratings-google-climbs-good-news-for-livecom-10805/comment-page-1#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dugdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/comparing-search-popularity-ratings-google-climbs-good-news-for-livecom-10805.php#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>Great info. I am becoming a big Compete.com fan. They have also stopped by my blog too and placed comments when I have talked about them.

For me the bottom line is why pay $30K to $45 a year for HitWise or ComScore when Compete is showing the same trends and it is Free!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info. I am becoming a big Compete.com fan. They have also stopped by my blog too and placed comments when I have talked about them.</p>
<p>For me the bottom line is why pay $30K to $45 a year for HitWise or ComScore when Compete is showing the same trends and it is Free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/comparing-search-popularity-ratings-google-climbs-good-news-for-livecom-10805/comment-page-1#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/comparing-search-popularity-ratings-google-climbs-good-news-for-livecom-10805.php#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>Danny if you would like the missing Compete data points drop me a note and I&#039;ll send you the raw data.  jcrane (at) compete (dot) com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny if you would like the missing Compete data points drop me a note and I&#8217;ll send you the raw data.  jcrane (at) compete (dot) com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/comparing-search-popularity-ratings-google-climbs-good-news-for-livecom-10805/comment-page-1#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 03:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/comparing-search-popularity-ratings-google-climbs-good-news-for-livecom-10805.php#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>Danny this is a super study of market share patterns, though I can&#039;t help but wonder if the main point here is that the measuring services are of very dubious quality.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny this is a super study of market share patterns, though I can&#8217;t help but wonder if the main point here is that the measuring services are of very dubious quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
