<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Danny Sullivan&#8217;s Ad Age Column &amp; Fast Company Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/danny-sullivans-ad-age-column-fast-company-debate-10643/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/danny-sullivans-ad-age-column-fast-company-debate-10643</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:19:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Parente</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/danny-sullivans-ad-age-column-fast-company-debate-10643/comment-page-1#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Parente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/danny-sullivans-ad-age-column-fast-company-debate-10643.php#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>Danny:

Congrats on the Ad Age column. That must have been a fun debate. I saw this blog mention of it: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/keen/?p=103&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.zdnet.com/keen/?p=103&lt;/a&gt;

And here were my comments -- you came off sounding far more persuasive than she did. She didn&#039;t criticize Google in any of the ways it makes sense to do so:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12693-0.html?forumID=1&amp;threadID=30835&amp;messageID=572530&amp;start=-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12693-0.html?forumID=1&amp;threadID=30835&amp;messageID=572530&amp;start=-1&lt;/a&gt;



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny:</p>
<p>Congrats on the Ad Age column. That must have been a fun debate. I saw this blog mention of it: <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/keen/?p=103" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/keen/?p=103</a></p>
<p>And here were my comments &#8212; you came off sounding far more persuasive than she did. She didn&#8217;t criticize Google in any of the ways it makes sense to do so:</p>
<p><a href="http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12693-0.html?forumID=1&#038;threadID=30835&#038;messageID=572530&#038;start=-1" rel="nofollow">http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12693-0.html?forumID=1&#038;threadID=30835&#038;messageID=572530&#038;start=-1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
