<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Despite Inauguration, Google &amp; Others Still Think It&#8217;s President Bush, Not President Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:17:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Asterix</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241/comment-page-1#comment-4579</link>
		<dc:creator>Asterix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16241#comment-4579</guid>
		<description>Yahoo image search seems to be significantly better than the rest for all the examples you quote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo image search seems to be significantly better than the rest for all the examples you quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VBP</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241/comment-page-1#comment-4564</link>
		<dc:creator>VBP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16241#comment-4564</guid>
		<description>That is a great piece of info. It will not be long before the days of instant updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a great piece of info. It will not be long before the days of instant updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paisley</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241/comment-page-1#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>paisley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16241#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>when u wrote your last article i did some digging and found out Obama&#039;s web team was going to use a CMS system and change all the directory names to start it over fresh. I didn&#039;ty think i was supposed to leak that.. so i didnt.. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when u wrote your last article i did some digging and found out Obama&#8217;s web team was going to use a CMS system and change all the directory names to start it over fresh. I didn&#8217;ty think i was supposed to leak that.. so i didnt.. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241/comment-page-1#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16241#comment-4559</guid>
		<description>But Nate, dude, it&#039;s not right. I mean it wasn&#039;t right! I mean it isn&#039;t right! I mean...

OK, so in terms of what you list number one right now, yep, the Encarta listing is showing Obama as president. But when I wrote this, that wasn&#039;t the case:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/searchengineland/3213162731/

But then the story was really about how everyone&#039;s listing the White House web site. And when I wrote this, you were still showing a description saying Bush was the president. And that&#039;s still the case for both &quot;white house&quot; and &quot;president of the united states.&quot; In both cases, Bush is shown as president right now. In the latter case, he&#039;s even showing that way in the title.

I&#039;m sure it will all be fixed soon when you recrawl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Nate, dude, it&#8217;s not right. I mean it wasn&#8217;t right! I mean it isn&#8217;t right! I mean&#8230;</p>
<p>OK, so in terms of what you list number one right now, yep, the Encarta listing is showing Obama as president. But when I wrote this, that wasn&#8217;t the case:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/searchengineland/3213162731/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/searchengineland/3213162731/</a></p>
<p>But then the story was really about how everyone&#8217;s listing the White House web site. And when I wrote this, you were still showing a description saying Bush was the president. And that&#8217;s still the case for both &#8220;white house&#8221; and &#8220;president of the united states.&#8221; In both cases, Bush is shown as president right now. In the latter case, he&#8217;s even showing that way in the title.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it will all be fixed soon when you recrawl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbuggia</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241/comment-page-1#comment-4555</link>
		<dc:creator>nbuggia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16241#comment-4555</guid>
		<description>Danny, why did you not include Live Search in the article? We actually got it right!

http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=president+of+the+united+states&amp;go=&amp;form=QBRE&amp;qs=n

nate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny, why did you not include Live Search in the article? We actually got it right!</p>
<p><a href="http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=president+of+the+united+states&amp;go=&amp;form=QBRE&amp;qs=n" rel="nofollow">http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=president+of+the+united+states&amp;go=&amp;form=QBRE&amp;qs=n</a></p>
<p>nate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yowazzup</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241/comment-page-1#comment-4554</link>
		<dc:creator>yowazzup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16241#comment-4554</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s not entirely Google or Yahoo&#039;s mistakes. White House has not updated its web site as quickly as you have caught them. By right, President George W. Bush is still a president of the United States, just whether it&#039;s &quot;past&quot; or &quot;current&quot;.

Anyway, President Bush is still a failure after the update at number 4, while your site is at number 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s not entirely Google or Yahoo&#8217;s mistakes. White House has not updated its web site as quickly as you have caught them. By right, President George W. Bush is still a president of the United States, just whether it&#8217;s &#8220;past&#8221; or &#8220;current&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyway, President Bush is still a failure after the update at number 4, while your site is at number 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiropractic</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241/comment-page-1#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>chiropractic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16241#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you hold them to a different level of standards than you do your members. I still have 2008 copyright tags to update.

Out of curiosity, &quot;miserable failure&quot; was the first search I made this morning. Your SEL article on the subject came up as the number one result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you hold them to a different level of standards than you do your members. I still have 2008 copyright tags to update.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, &#8220;miserable failure&#8221; was the first search I made this morning. Your SEL article on the subject came up as the number one result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: javaun</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/despite-inaugruation-google-others-still-think-its-president-bush-not-president-obama-16241/comment-page-1#comment-4551</link>
		<dc:creator>javaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16241#comment-4551</guid>
		<description>Nice catches, Danny. Looking at the Google listing for &quot;white house&quot;, they&#039;ve updated the title and snippet, but all of the site links (save &quot;President&quot; and &quot;First Lady&quot; ) redirect to the &quot;Page Not Found&quot; message. But it&#039;s a pseudo 404. According to the HTTP header, they&#039;re 302&#039;ing it. So maybe there is still hope for all of George Washington&#039;s lost link love?

HTTP Header snippet. 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://www.whitehouse.gov/interactive/

GET /interactive/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.whitehouse.gov

HTTP/1.x 302 Moved Temporarily
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice catches, Danny. Looking at the Google listing for &#8220;white house&#8221;, they&#8217;ve updated the title and snippet, but all of the site links (save &#8220;President&#8221; and &#8220;First Lady&#8221; ) redirect to the &#8220;Page Not Found&#8221; message. But it&#8217;s a pseudo 404. According to the HTTP header, they&#8217;re 302&#8242;ing it. So maybe there is still hope for all of George Washington&#8217;s lost link love?</p>
<p>HTTP Header snippet.<br />
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br />
<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/interactive/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/interactive/</a></p>
<p>GET /interactive/ HTTP/1.1<br />
Host: <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov</a></p>
<p>HTTP/1.x 302 Moved Temporarily<br />
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
