<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking The Italian Newspapers&#8217; Antitrust Allegations Against Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/deunking-the-italian-newspapers-antitrust-allegations-against-google-24698/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/deunking-the-italian-newspapers-antitrust-allegations-against-google-24698</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:06:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stupidscript</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/deunking-the-italian-newspapers-antitrust-allegations-against-google-24698/comment-page-1#comment-6824</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupidscript</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=24698#comment-6824</guid>
		<description>Something I have been hearing more and more, these days:

&quot;You&#039;ll never get it if you don&#039;t ask.&quot;

This has been used to justify the most inane, hopeless goals, such as &quot;Get our supplier to give us 50% off!&quot; and &quot;Let 6 of us in for the price of 4!&quot; It just makes the person who asks seem like an idiot (especially awful when it is a subordinate asking at their &quot;superior&#039;s&quot; insistence against their better judgement) and the person who has to respond seem like an a****le. A no-win situation that is poisoning relationships all over the place.

Look what it&#039;s doing for the FIEG! They&#039;ve never looked more silly, even as they dip their chins and mumble, &quot;Yeah, but we won&#039;t get it if we don&#039;t ask...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I have been hearing more and more, these days:</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;ll never get it if you don&#8217;t ask.&#8221;</p>
<p>This has been used to justify the most inane, hopeless goals, such as &#8220;Get our supplier to give us 50% off!&#8221; and &#8220;Let 6 of us in for the price of 4!&#8221; It just makes the person who asks seem like an idiot (especially awful when it is a subordinate asking at their &#8220;superior&#8217;s&#8221; insistence against their better judgement) and the person who has to respond seem like an a****le. A no-win situation that is poisoning relationships all over the place.</p>
<p>Look what it&#8217;s doing for the FIEG! They&#8217;ve never looked more silly, even as they dip their chins and mumble, &#8220;Yeah, but we won&#8217;t get it if we don&#8217;t ask&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wordsmithbob</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/deunking-the-italian-newspapers-antitrust-allegations-against-google-24698/comment-page-1#comment-6785</link>
		<dc:creator>wordsmithbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=24698#comment-6785</guid>
		<description>The silliest part of this argument is that, as every SEO knows, google gives a great deal of preference to newspapers because of all the high quality content. Which is as it should be. Quality content should win out of crass sales pitches.

I also don&#039;t think the Italian newspapers are alone. so many newspapers are hurting because of the Internet that I imagine a lot of other news organizations my &quot;gang up on&quot; or at least try to blame Google for their problems. 

Don&#039;t shoot the messenger. Google is just trying to deliver the most relevant news to those searching for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The silliest part of this argument is that, as every SEO knows, google gives a great deal of preference to newspapers because of all the high quality content. Which is as it should be. Quality content should win out of crass sales pitches.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t think the Italian newspapers are alone. so many newspapers are hurting because of the Internet that I imagine a lot of other news organizations my &#8220;gang up on&#8221; or at least try to blame Google for their problems. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t shoot the messenger. Google is just trying to deliver the most relevant news to those searching for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickstamoulis</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/deunking-the-italian-newspapers-antitrust-allegations-against-google-24698/comment-page-1#comment-6776</link>
		<dc:creator>nickstamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=24698#comment-6776</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think that newspapers provide online content (much like many blogs, content providers, etc) and should not be treated any differently than any other website.  I agree that the search engines do provide enough information so the newspaper sites can build their sites properly to maximize their visitors through the engines...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think that newspapers provide online content (much like many blogs, content providers, etc) and should not be treated any differently than any other website.  I agree that the search engines do provide enough information so the newspaper sites can build their sites properly to maximize their visitors through the engines&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
