This is my 25th mobile search column and my 30th post for Search Engine Land in almost four years. Mobile search has evolved quite a bit since I started writing this column in 2009, and even more since the iPhone turned everything on its head in 2007.

In my first column, I argued that the iPhone didn’t kill mobile SEO, saying that it instead made mobile searching mainstream, and ushered in a whole new type of searching that Google and SEOs would have to account for at some point.

I still believe this is true today, almost four years after that first article; but, there are many still who argue that mobile search doesn’t really matter—that search is search, and the devices that people use to search don’t necessarily give clues to their intent.

The Argument For Ubiquity

Google slide on ubiquity from their Inside Search event from June 2011

In the early days of mobile, many people thought it would create a medium completely separate from the Internet.

In early 2008, Al Ries wrote in AdAge about a phenomenon called MobileNet, which he said would be “an even bigger medium for active advertising than the Internet,” as though the Internet were one thing, and the MobileNet something different entirely.

He envisioned a time when a different kind of website would be constructed that would make use of scanners, GPS and voice recognition to provide a new kind of real-time utility to people that static information on the Internet wasn’t quite able to do.

Though he clearly got some things wrong (he called these sites dot-mobis, for example, when most of the sites made for mobile consumption today are actually dot-coms), his description of what was possible with these new devices sounds a lot like what many have done with the best mobile apps and sites today.

Yet, the mobile Web isn’t what a lot of people thought it was going to be. For one, it doesn’t always fit in your pocket. With the popularity of the iPad, consumers now have a mobile device that is technically mobile, but is large enough to be used mostly for entertainment and shopping at home.

Phablet anyone? The phone/tablet hybrid Galaxy Note is one such device that blurs the lines between mobile hardware. And, with the iPad Mini, Nexus 7 and Kindle Fire, many devices now exist that are not quite tablets, not quite smartphones, but a combination of the two.

With the looming Internet of Things, we also have Internet access in cars, picture frames, refrigerators and more that make it even more difficult to know from the hardware the intent of the target audience. Is someone looking for sports scores in his car mobile, per se? Is someone looking for recipes at his refrigerator mobile?

To further complicate matters, the mobile Web is also not always mobile. We know now that many users use their smartphones at home. According to Google research, 97% of consumers are in this category.

Google research also tells us that tasks are accomplished on multiple devices, and research started on a smartphone may lead to a conversion elsewhere. Also, that consumers expect information they put in or researched on one device to be available on another.

This is the principle of ubiquity, which Google highlighted at their Inside Search event last year, and which Google CEO Larry Page mentioned on his earnings call late last month. It has caused some to believe that the need for distinctions between mobile and desktop is as relevant today as the first Motorola Razr; but, this isn’t entirely true.

A Case For Mobile Search And Ubiquity

As regular readers of this column know, device fragmentation has led many to conclude that responsive design and adaptive content is an ideal solution for solving the problems inherent with device fragmentation and user intent.

NPR’s content strategy of Create Once Publish Everywhere (COPE) has become a model of efficiency for many in the mobile, content, design, and SEO communities.

Slide from Google’s recent study “The New Multi-Screen World” that shows the unique characteristics of smartphone users.

This is in direct contrast to the MobileNet model, which demands that brands consider the mobile context and the unique use cases that it might create, and publish separate content to address those use cases, if it is beneficial to the user and the brand.

What we as marketers need to realize is that these two philosophies need not be mutually exclusive. Yes, mobile users aren’t necessarily mobile and might be looking for the same content that desktop users are looking for.

But also, yes, a person’s informational needs are likely different based on the device that they use, and optimization would entail creating native landing pages tailored to that device.

Consider the following:

  • In the same research where Google examines multi-screen behavior, it concludes that “consumers shop differently across devices, so businesses should tailor the experience to each channel. It’s also important to optimize the shopping experience across all devices. For example, consumers need to find what they are looking for quickly and need a streamlined path to conversion on smartphones.”
  • Google also says in the same research, “Consumers turn to their devices in various contexts. Marketing and websites should reflect the needs of a consumer on a specific screen, and conversion goals should be adjusted to account for the inherent differences in each device
  • Google recommends responsive design for smartphone experiences to most webmasters, but has separate user interfaces and algorithms for mobile and tablet search.
  • In May of this year we introduced the mobile variance by category concept, which demonstrated that people search differently depending on their context. Google has since confirmed this, most recently in What Users Want from Mobile Sites Today and The Meaning of Mobile, indicating how mobile typically differs from every other channel. Microsoft has released similar research about mobile’s role in the consumer journey with similar results. It may be a myth, as Brad Frost says, that mobile users don’t want access to the same content that desktop users have; but that doesn’t mean that they wouldn’t prefer that we catered the experience to their specific device, especially if their needs are much different on mobile than they are on desktop.

It might not be the most efficient model, but if we want to continue to be relevant to our users, and ultimately monetize mobile as a channel, we need to understand how mobile search is different from desktop and tablet search, changing our websites and marketing accordingly.

Many of us may find similar behavior on desktops and mobile devices, presenting similar content. But, that doesn’t mean that multiscreen behavior and a desire for ubiquity have negated the need for platform-specific content. MobileNet, along with WAP search, dotMobis, iMode et al may be distant memories for most these days; however, mobile search and catering to a specific platform with websites and marketing matters as much (if not more, since there are more mobile users today) than it ever has.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Mobile Search | Search Engines: Mobile Search Engines | Search Marketing: Mobile | SEO: Mobile Search

Sponsored


About The Author: is Director of Content Solutions at Resolution Media, and a primary architect of Resolution Media's natural search product and Digital Behavior Analysis. You can follow him on Twitter @BrysonMeunier

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://jeffdownerbailbonds.com/ Jeff Downer Indianapolis IN

    Here’s an anecdote that’s on point with your post. Lately I have been receiving significant converting traffic from mobile users that isn’t even sent to my website.

    It’s Siri, sending folks to my phone.

  • Wesley Picotte

    Bryson, I really enjoyed this post.

    This is such an interesting topic, and a challenging one to fully parse, but mobile search behavior and context is clearly distinct from desktop search.

    I just recently helped a colleague understand a disparity in the analytics data of his personal blog between mobile traffic delivered from social platforms and traffic form mobile search. Specifically, Twitter delivers a higher percentage of traffic to his site via mobile when measured against all traffic from Twitter than does organic search. And, as his blog audience has grown, mobile contribution from social platforms has roughly followed the growth curve while mobile search traffic from Google flatlined.

    He worried aloud about an algorithmic penalty based on his site’s mobile experience. I posited that, since his blog (1) is still somewhat new (2) not rigorously search optimized, (3) does not include a mobile-specific version, and (4) covers a specialized B2B space, that he’s seeing search behavior at work.

    His blog receives search impressions for relatively long-tail-ish terms, while terms typically used for mobile search are one to two words in length. Since he has not optimized for search (let alone mobile search), and does not have a mobile-specific version of his site, this is a clear [potential] bottleneck for contribution from mobile search. Meanwhile, social networks are effectively for content curation (or broadcasting content curation) and a likely place for his audience to find the type of subject matter he addresses while mobile.

 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide