Comments on: Dogpile: Search Results On Major Engines Diverging http://searchengineland.com/dogpile-search-results-on-major-engines-diverging-11364 Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing & Search Engines Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:24:43 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: MJ http://searchengineland.com/dogpile-search-results-on-major-engines-diverging-11364/comment-page-1#comment-2720 MJ Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:06:45 +0000 http://searchengineland.com/beta/dogpile-search-results-on-major-engines-diverging-11364.php#comment-2720 If you read the study, you will see that data for the study was compiled in April 2007. Please see the second paragraph of the paper. If you read the study, you will see that data for the study was compiled in April 2007. Please see the second paragraph of the paper.

]]> By: Michael Martinez http://searchengineland.com/dogpile-search-results-on-major-engines-diverging-11364/comment-page-1#comment-2719 Michael Martinez Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:26:43 +0000 http://searchengineland.com/beta/dogpile-search-results-on-major-engines-diverging-11364.php#comment-2719 The report is based on data from two years ago. Both Google and Yahoo! have implemented a lot of algorithmic changes since then (and Google has redesigned its search engine twice in that time frame). Ask is also about to unleash a new algorithm (if it hasn't turned on Edison yet). This report is neither very relevant nor very interesting for those reasons. It would help tremendously if they do the study again based on 2007 search results (and publish the report in 2007, not 2009). The report is based on data from two years ago. Both Google and Yahoo! have implemented a lot of algorithmic changes since then (and Google has redesigned its search engine twice in that time frame). Ask is also about to unleash a new algorithm (if it hasn’t turned on Edison yet).

This report is neither very relevant nor very interesting for those reasons. It would help tremendously if they do the study again based on 2007 search results (and publish the report in 2007, not 2009).

]]>