<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Expect A Magic Flash Solution For Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/dont-expect-a-magic-flash-solution-for-search-engines-10826/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/dont-expect-a-magic-flash-solution-for-search-engines-10826</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:17:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Lenssen</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/dont-expect-a-magic-flash-solution-for-search-engines-10826/comment-page-1#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Lenssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/dont-expect-a-magic-flash-solution-for-search-engines-10826.php#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>But as for the sites that do contain content, there&#039;s a problem that good multi-language Flash sites outsource the actual text as XML for easy maintenance. We had this problem with Porsche.com&#039;s Flash-based microsites. Google would only show the stuff in the Flash file itself, not the stuff from the XMLs. All in all, if you want to have meaningful indexing, use HTML, though Flash can attract a lot of interest if well done, which is also part of &quot;link building&quot;...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But as for the sites that do contain content, there&#8217;s a problem that good multi-language Flash sites outsource the actual text as XML for easy maintenance. We had this problem with Porsche.com&#8217;s Flash-based microsites. Google would only show the stuff in the Flash file itself, not the stuff from the XMLs. All in all, if you want to have meaningful indexing, use HTML, though Flash can attract a lot of interest if well done, which is also part of &#8220;link building&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miketheinternetguy</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/dont-expect-a-magic-flash-solution-for-search-engines-10826/comment-page-1#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>miketheinternetguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/dont-expect-a-magic-flash-solution-for-search-engines-10826.php#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>I just use SWFObject to embed Flash movies and move on. Seems to work fine for now. In the &quot;noflashcontent&quot; div I usually transcribe what is contained in Flash, or at least my close interpretation. Don&#039;t get too spammy with it

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just use SWFObject to embed Flash movies and move on. Seems to work fine for now. In the &#8220;noflashcontent&#8221; div I usually transcribe what is contained in Flash, or at least my close interpretation. Don&#8217;t get too spammy with it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/dont-expect-a-magic-flash-solution-for-search-engines-10826/comment-page-1#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/dont-expect-a-magic-flash-solution-for-search-engines-10826.php#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>If they can capture the audio track and automatically transcribe it, they&#039;ll be able to index the transcription.  Blinkx already claims to be doing this.  I wouldn&#039;t write Google off just yet, as they must surely have resources to devote to similar capability.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they can capture the audio track and automatically transcribe it, they&#8217;ll be able to index the transcription.  Blinkx already claims to be doing this.  I wouldn&#8217;t write Google off just yet, as they must surely have resources to devote to similar capability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
