<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr Now Second Most Popular Photo Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/flickr-now-second-most-popular-photo-site-11662/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/flickr-now-second-most-popular-photo-site-11662</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:17:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciarán</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/flickr-now-second-most-popular-photo-site-11662/comment-page-1#comment-3217</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciarán</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/flickr-now-second-most-popular-photo-site-11662.php#comment-3217</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to see the same stats for the UK (if you&#039;re listening &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-hopkins/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Heather&lt;/a&gt;!)

My totally unscientific gut feeling is that Flickr is actually the bigger beast over here (Alexa certainly think so).

On the point about Yahoo! moving traffic to it&#039;s social properties, I wonder how long it will be before they turn off Yahoo! My Web (as Tim Meyer hinted in response to my question at SMX), in order to send it to del.icio.us
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see the same stats for the UK (if you&#8217;re listening <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-hopkins/" rel="nofollow">Heather</a>!)</p>
<p>My totally unscientific gut feeling is that Flickr is actually the bigger beast over here (Alexa certainly think so).</p>
<p>On the point about Yahoo! moving traffic to it&#8217;s social properties, I wonder how long it will be before they turn off Yahoo! My Web (as Tim Meyer hinted in response to my question at SMX), in order to send it to del.icio.us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sharp</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/flickr-now-second-most-popular-photo-site-11662/comment-page-1#comment-3216</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/flickr-now-second-most-popular-photo-site-11662.php#comment-3216</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t they providing completely different services? Doesn&#039;t seem like they should even be compared.

Flickr is primarily a community site to share photos, while Photobucket is an image-hosting service to host your forum-avatar if you don&#039;t have bandwidth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t they providing completely different services? Doesn&#8217;t seem like they should even be compared.</p>
<p>Flickr is primarily a community site to share photos, while Photobucket is an image-hosting service to host your forum-avatar if you don&#8217;t have bandwidth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.239 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-25 16:28:55 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
