Google Checkout’s Title Goes Missing On Google

Google Checkout Title Goes Missing

Something look odd in the search results above for google checkout? Yes, that’s the official Google Checkout home page listed first, but it’s most definitely NOT the right title for the Google Checkout page. That’s got folks at Digg wondering if Google Checkout has been hijacked, sparked from Jon West’s original post here. No. It’s just Google being lame. Below, more about how ended up providing the current title for Google Checkout as listed on Google, as well as a look at the problems of dealing with titles for pages that a spider can’t access.

Most search engines, including Google, primarily depend on a page’s title tag to make titles that show up in search results. Need an illustrated guide to understand this? Jennifer Laycock over at Search Engine Guide has a nice tutorial that came out recently on it.

The title tag is the text that goes within the two parts of a title tag of a page’s HTML code, like this:

<title>This is where the title goes</title>

The text in that area is used to make the title of a page as listed in search results, in most cases. If that was really your title, then your page would be listed like this:

This is where the title goes

Sometimes, pages lack title tags at all. Sometimes, they have title tags present but no text within the tag itself. In these cases, search engines sometimes do different things to come up with a title so that the page doesn’t look bad in results. They might just list a URL in place of the title. Some, in the past, have said "No Title."

It’s been some time since I’ve comprehensively surveyed the situation. But recently, both Google and Yahoo have experimented more with using anchor text to describe pages. This effectively means that how people link to you could be used to describe your pages, if you’ve neglected your title tags.

It has taken ages to finally convince search engines to stop using third-party Open Directory and Yahoo Directory descriptions as titles for web pages (an opt-out you can do by using the NOODP and NOYDR meta robots tags). Now it looks like we’ll need a NOANCHOR options, if anchor text continues to be used this way.

That brings us to the Google Checkout situation. If Google could reach the Google Checkout home page, it would likely have used this title tag:

<title>Google Checkout</title>

Which would have listed the site as:

Google Checkout

However, I think the redirection that Google has in place might be preventing the crawler from reaching the page. Many Google products like Google Checkout annoyingly have no static URL. If you try to reach the home page at, a huge redirected URL takes its place. Come one, Google — enough with this!

It’s not an issue that the page is on a secure https:// server. If that were the case, then searches for adsense would show a funky title for Google’s AdSense page.

However it happened, Google has decided to go with anchor text to come up with the title for Google Checkout. And that anchor text came from In particular, the Google Checkout title says:

use google checkout on hibidder com free

So where is this on the HiBidder site? When I looked, I didn’t see it at first. However, a search showed 1,300 matches. I looked again, then spotted it in the code like this:

<a href="" target="blank">
<img src="images/google_checkout.gif" alt="Use Google Checkout on – Free!" title="Use Google Checkout on – Free!" border="0" height="39" width="100">

I’ve bolded the text. It’s in both the ALT and TITLE attributes for an image that links to Google Checkout. So not only is Google using anchor text to make the title, it’s also using either ALT or TITLE attributes to determine anchor text content, if no actual HTML link text is provided.

For its part, Google sent me this on the situation

In the overwhelming majority of cases, we use the title tag of the page for the search results title. When we are unable to extract a title (the page has no title tag or the tag is empty, for instance), we may use the anchor text in links to the page to provide a title, which is a better experience for the searcher than no title or just the URL. This is a better result for the webmaster as well, since it likely makes the result more compelling to click on. A webmaster can ensure that anchor text is not used by including an extractable title for the page in a title tag.

The other time we may use anchor text for the title is when the page is blocked by a robots.txt file. These URLs may appear in our search results as "partially indexed pages", described here

In these cases, we do not crawl or index the content of the page, and therefore, don’t extract a title from a page. If the webmaster would prefer that even the URL for these pages not appear in the search results, they can put a meta noindex tag on the pages or can request removal via the URL removal options in webmaster tools.

Note that the lowercasing of the title is a temporary issue that should be resolved soon

I can understand the desire to put something out to describe pages that are missing title tags or have blank ones. I’d like to see the search engines come up with a common standard for this, such as saying something like "No Title" or "No Title Available" or using the URL as the title.

It’s another issue entirely on what to do about pages that can’t be crawled but still get listed (Meta Robots Tag 101: Blocking Spiders, Cached Pages & More explains more about how this situation can happen). Going with anchor text can be just as dangerous and annoying, if not more so, than going with third party directory titles. Probably, search engines will need to do the same thing in this situations as for pages with empty or missing title tags.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Google: Checkout | Google: SEO | SEO: Titles & Descriptions


About The Author: is a Founding Editor of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also serves as Chief Content Officer for Third Door Media, which publishes Search Engine Land and produces the SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He has a personal blog called Daggle (and keeps his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • eCopt

    Yeah, I saw this and thought it wasn’t quite worthy of news, but did wonder why it would appear like that.

    Do tell if you hear anything through the grape vine.

    When you click through to the page the title is as it should be. None of the others seem to be affected.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide