<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Confirms Testing Favicons In Search Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/google-confirms-testing-favicons-in-search-results-16312/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-confirms-testing-favicons-in-search-results-16312</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: falkon303</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-confirms-testing-favicons-in-search-results-16312/comment-page-1#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>falkon303</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16312#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>This is VERY odd considering people can sue for usage of favicons.....  I&#039;d love to hear more on the legalities of this.  Perhaps they have permission from the sites they are showing?

Favicons can be the subject of law suit if used within a web browser&#039;s inner page instead of only the browser exe itself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is VERY odd considering people can sue for usage of favicons&#8230;..  I&#8217;d love to hear more on the legalities of this.  Perhaps they have permission from the sites they are showing?</p>
<p>Favicons can be the subject of law suit if used within a web browser&#8217;s inner page instead of only the browser exe itself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
