<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Expands Google Suggest &amp; Local News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/google-expands-google-suggest-local-news-17183/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-expands-google-suggest-local-news-17183</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:37:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: onlinemurray</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-expands-google-suggest-local-news-17183/comment-page-1#comment-5176</link>
		<dc:creator>onlinemurray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=17183#comment-5176</guid>
		<description>I really like the depth to which you showed the imapct of this. It&#039;s significant despite some of the gaps, including the lack of local inserts with singular terms vs. plural that seem more likely to generate the 3- and 10-packs. The rankings world is a rough ride already and will only get crazier if the regular natural results go local this way. Maybe they should if user intent can be determined a great deal. I&#039;m all for giving engines some room to be wrong sometimes. As they move to the natural waters, there may be a danger of pushing down valuable results if they decide to display both national and local listings for a non-geo term. Now that will be interesting.

--Mike Murray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the depth to which you showed the imapct of this. It&#8217;s significant despite some of the gaps, including the lack of local inserts with singular terms vs. plural that seem more likely to generate the 3- and 10-packs. The rankings world is a rough ride already and will only get crazier if the regular natural results go local this way. Maybe they should if user intent can be determined a great deal. I&#8217;m all for giving engines some room to be wrong sometimes. As they move to the natural waters, there may be a danger of pushing down valuable results if they decide to display both national and local listings for a non-geo term. Now that will be interesting.</p>
<p>&#8211;Mike Murray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.246 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-25 13:44:14 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
