<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google &amp; Firefox 2 Anti-Phishing Warning In Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/google-firefox-2-anti-phishing-warning-in-action-10312/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-firefox-2-anti-phishing-warning-in-action-10312</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:19:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: S0crates9</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-firefox-2-anti-phishing-warning-in-action-10312/comment-page-1#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>S0crates9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-firefox-2-anti-phishing-warning-in-action-10312.php#comment-726</guid>
		<description>The best way to address phishing, is to consult with a team that does it. Use the knowledge to create soem sort of heuristics detection along with a database of known &quot;whitelist&quot; sites.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way to address phishing, is to consult with a team that does it. Use the knowledge to create soem sort of heuristics detection along with a database of known &#8220;whitelist&#8221; sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoramn</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-firefox-2-anti-phishing-warning-in-action-10312/comment-page-1#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>yoramn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-firefox-2-anti-phishing-warning-in-action-10312.php#comment-725</guid>
		<description>The problem with these phishing filters is that they are immature and many Internet fraud attempts can still get through. Gartner agrres with this statement.
The only solution that can really protect users from scam is a combination of
1. Phishing filter
2. Detection of non phishing scam sites
3. Warning the user before he clicks a link about the potential problems of following the link
4. Positive identification of good sites and thir owners providing the information to the user in order to help him deciding if it is OK to deal with a site

There are solutions providing all the above, like CallingID
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with these phishing filters is that they are immature and many Internet fraud attempts can still get through. Gartner agrres with this statement.<br />
The only solution that can really protect users from scam is a combination of<br />
1. Phishing filter<br />
2. Detection of non phishing scam sites<br />
3. Warning the user before he clicks a link about the potential problems of following the link<br />
4. Positive identification of good sites and thir owners providing the information to the user in order to help him deciding if it is OK to deal with a site</p>
<p>There are solutions providing all the above, like CallingID</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.258 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 11:36:18 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
