Google Logo Changes As You Type

Google continues to have fun with its home page logo in the lead up to a search-related event/announcement that’s planned for Wednesday morning. The new logo is grayed out when you first visit


But it begins to change to the traditional, multi-colored logo as you type a search query. A cursor appears up in the word “Google,” and the colors return to gray if you backspace as you type.


It’s very much like the search results as you type feature that was first spotted a couple weeks ago, and seems to be another preview of what’s to come on Wednesday.

On Tuesday, Google’s home page featured a logo made up of balls/circles that the company described as “fast, fun and interactive, just the way we think search should be.”

Postscript: You can read our live blogging or learn how to watch the Google search event live at 9:30 PST by going here.

Related Topics: Channel: Consumer | Google: Logos | Google: Web Search | Top News


About The Author: is Editor-In-Chief of Search Engine Land. His news career includes time spent in TV, radio, and print journalism. His web career continues to include a small number of SEO and social media consulting clients, as well as regular speaking engagements at marketing events around the U.S. He recently launched a site dedicated to Google Glass called Glass Almanac and also blogs at Small Business Search Marketing. Matt can be found on Twitter at @MattMcGee and/or on Google Plus. You can read Matt's disclosures on his personal blog.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • George Revutsky

    There seem to be 2 big implications to live updating results, that most folks I talk to seem to overlook.

    1) This is, potentially a huge jump in revenue for Google due to the pre-emption of long-tail queries

    2) This may have a significant negative effect on the larger, more sophisticated paid search advertisers who have a lot of long tail keywords and log account histories.

    Here’s why I think the above – would love to hear other perspectives.

    When a searcher’s 5-6 word query is frequently pre-empted by a 2,3, or 4-word suggested query, the resulting paid search ads will cost more, on a per click basis, than if the searcher completed their original (potentially longer-tail query).

    In general, 2,3, and 4-word phrases are generally more expensive.

    For example, along comes a searcher who is looking for “cosmetic dentist in walnut creek specializing in Britesmile”

    They start to type, and the suggestion bar and the live-updating results pre-empt them completing the search and they choose to just search on “cosmetic dentist”. VOILA! Google just got to serve up ads against a shorter, more expensive phrase. More revenue.

    Yes, this adverse effect does partially depend on the keyword match types in the dentist’s account. If they weren’t set up correctly in the first place, both the long tail and shorter search might have been priced the same. But if they were, it would hurt them.

    2) SERP Load Acceleration = Revenue Acceleration

    Yes – searchers will save a little bit of time typing. And this will accelerate the time from search to click. So more revenue – a little bit faster each day.

    If you take a few milliseconds, maybe even a third of a second, saved on, say, 5-10% of all searches done by Google, that’s a LOT of acceleration and quicker results (as they are pre-loaded).

    3) A Wealth of New Searcher Intent Data
    By seeing what people start to type and what they end up settling on when presented with essentially a multiple choice set of options (a, b, c, or “none – let me complete my query”), Google gets an amazing ability to model what kind of phrases can pre-empt long tail searches, and what kind actually trigger them.

    And then they can see what kind of people this works with and what kind it does not.
    My guess is, you can build some very different types of models in such a situation, rather than simply analyzing what is being typed in across a huge volume.

    For a simple example, you can look at gender differences across verticals when faced with what amounts to multiple-choice prompts.

    Some studies, for example at Sweden’s Goteborg University, show significant differences in male vs. female performance on multiple choice and free-response formats. ( The results of that study show that women generally perform better on free response tests, while men generally perform better on multiple-choice tests.

    Now, I have no idea if that is really the case. Please let’s not start a gender aptitude conversation here – that’s not my point at all.

    I just mean that if you’re Google, you can start to make inferences about demographics vis a vis the autosuggest field. You can see how folks interact differently with the auto-suggest, and, if someone is logged in, change the autosuggest for them. Gender could be one of many things you look at. Same with age. Or geography. Or maybe none of these things.

    Finally, you can even look at prior behaviour, which is considered by most database marketers to be more predictive than demographics, and tailor the autosuggest to THAT.

    For example, if I went to 3 adoption agency websites in the recent past, then started a search with the phrase “adoption…..” Google couldmake most of its auto-suggests be about the adoption of children, and maybe only 2 will be about pet adoption.

    The potential of this tool is mind-boggling actually.

    To sum up, the whole point of this update is to a) make the Search query about more expensive keywords b) load the results faster and c) make the searcher’s likelier to click on a paid result.

    Guys – I think this update is a really, really big deal. Would love to hear everyone’s thoughts. Would have posted this on out blog, but we’re just getting our new one up.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide