<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Offers A Peek Into Its Internal Eye-Tracking Studies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/google-offers-peek-into-eye-tracking-studies-16479/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-offers-peek-into-eye-tracking-studies-16479</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:39:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hodson</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-offers-peek-into-eye-tracking-studies-16479/comment-page-1#comment-4721</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16479#comment-4721</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that Google&#039;s researchers jump to the following conclusion:

&quot;This pattern suggests that the order in which Google returned the results was successful; most users found what they were looking for among the first two results and they never needed to go further down the page.&quot;

This smacks of bad science.

Some users may click on the first or second result regardless of its relevance, either out of habit or laziness, or because they &quot;trust&quot; Google to come up with the right results.

Studies of user behaviour, including one well-documented experiment at Cornell University where the first and second results were switched, support this.

Imagine a study of 100 people asking a policeman for directions. If a high proportion of the people follow his directions, does that show they are accurate? I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that Google&#8217;s researchers jump to the following conclusion:</p>
<p>&#8220;This pattern suggests that the order in which Google returned the results was successful; most users found what they were looking for among the first two results and they never needed to go further down the page.&#8221;</p>
<p>This smacks of bad science.</p>
<p>Some users may click on the first or second result regardless of its relevance, either out of habit or laziness, or because they &#8220;trust&#8221; Google to come up with the right results.</p>
<p>Studies of user behaviour, including one well-documented experiment at Cornell University where the first and second results were switched, support this.</p>
<p>Imagine a study of 100 people asking a policeman for directions. If a high proportion of the people follow his directions, does that show they are accurate? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiropractic</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-offers-peek-into-eye-tracking-studies-16479/comment-page-1#comment-4716</link>
		<dc:creator>chiropractic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16479#comment-4716</guid>
		<description>That one screenshot in the Google post w/an image in it looks like same results that were discussed on SEL in the past where an image creates a virtual stop sign. Don&#039;t know what the studies say but it looks as though an image in position #4 has little effect on numbers 1,2 and 3 but does effect 5,6 and below.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That one screenshot in the Google post w/an image in it looks like same results that were discussed on SEL in the past where an image creates a virtual stop sign. Don&#8217;t know what the studies say but it looks as though an image in position #4 has little effect on numbers 1,2 and 3 but does effect 5,6 and below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.236 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 11:11:17 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
