<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Quietly Drops PageRank From Webmaster Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/google-quietly-drops-pagerank-from-webmaster-tools-27821/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-quietly-drops-pagerank-from-webmaster-tools-27821</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:53:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: SalesPractice</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-quietly-drops-pagerank-from-webmaster-tools-27821/comment-page-1#comment-7462</link>
		<dc:creator>SalesPractice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=27821#comment-7462</guid>
		<description>It could be that I haven&#039;t had my morning coffee but... it seems to me that obsessing over PageRank scores falls right in there with obsessing over the number of Friends/Followers on social networking websites. In most cases, the obsession is a misguided focus. I believe Google and most in the know tried to get that message across but to no avail so for the betterment of the community as a whole they removed the tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be that I haven&#8217;t had my morning coffee but&#8230; it seems to me that obsessing over PageRank scores falls right in there with obsessing over the number of Friends/Followers on social networking websites. In most cases, the obsession is a misguided focus. I believe Google and most in the know tried to get that message across but to no avail so for the betterment of the community as a whole they removed the tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Murray</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-quietly-drops-pagerank-from-webmaster-tools-27821/comment-page-1#comment-7423</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=27821#comment-7423</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never been that conserned about pagerank, yes OK, it may look good. However, within my blog not all my posts have a rank, but some of those post get more traffic than the ones with a rank.

Thanks of the info Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never been that conserned about pagerank, yes OK, it may look good. However, within my blog not all my posts have a rank, but some of those post get more traffic than the ones with a rank.</p>
<p>Thanks of the info Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimHardin</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-quietly-drops-pagerank-from-webmaster-tools-27821/comment-page-1#comment-7413</link>
		<dc:creator>JimHardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=27821#comment-7413</guid>
		<description>I have to admit I am a relatively new blogger and I have been watching my page rank a little bit more than I should probably.  It is probably cause I am new, but maybe it isn&#039;t that important.  I feel that as long as I keep creating quality posts traffic will build and I will get readers.

Thanks for the information!
jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit I am a relatively new blogger and I have been watching my page rank a little bit more than I should probably.  It is probably cause I am new, but maybe it isn&#8217;t that important.  I feel that as long as I keep creating quality posts traffic will build and I will get readers.</p>
<p>Thanks for the information!<br />
jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital_Desire</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-quietly-drops-pagerank-from-webmaster-tools-27821/comment-page-1#comment-7402</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital_Desire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=27821#comment-7402</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll see it back soon...it normally disappears from the console just before a big update....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see it back soon&#8230;it normally disappears from the console just before a big update&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnCarcutt</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-quietly-drops-pagerank-from-webmaster-tools-27821/comment-page-1#comment-7398</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnCarcutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=27821#comment-7398</guid>
		<description>Now if we can get the to do the same with the Toolbar, life will be grand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if we can get the to do the same with the Toolbar, life will be grand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiropractic</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-quietly-drops-pagerank-from-webmaster-tools-27821/comment-page-1#comment-7388</link>
		<dc:creator>chiropractic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=27821#comment-7388</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just glad I stopped obsessing on pagerank (went cold turkey in 2007) so showing vs not showing doesn&#039;t matter much. I still find myself peeking at the toolbar at times, but nothing like in the &quot;old&quot; days. Nice find Barry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just glad I stopped obsessing on pagerank (went cold turkey in 2007) so showing vs not showing doesn&#8217;t matter much. I still find myself peeking at the toolbar at times, but nothing like in the &#8220;old&#8221; days. Nice find Barry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: berto</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-quietly-drops-pagerank-from-webmaster-tools-27821/comment-page-1#comment-7386</link>
		<dc:creator>berto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=27821#comment-7386</guid>
		<description>Are you sure they didn&#039;t drop it because it was a worthless report. I think their product department was just trying to provide more useful information that was requested more.

I just want to know why they removed the full query stats report. That one used to give you the page url, the search phrase used to generate an impression, the average position, and the same for the clicks. It was the best part of their tool, and they dropped it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure they didn&#8217;t drop it because it was a worthless report. I think their product department was just trying to provide more useful information that was requested more.</p>
<p>I just want to know why they removed the full query stats report. That one used to give you the page url, the search phrase used to generate an impression, the average position, and the same for the clicks. It was the best part of their tool, and they dropped it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.236 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 12:04:10 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
