Google Says European Law Does Not Support Mosley Lawsuit To Censor Search Results

Google EuropeYesterday, Google posted a plea on their Google Europe blog asking European courts to dismiss a lawsuit filed by former Formula One president Max Mosley. The lawsuit requests that Google build a filter to identify and block what Mosley claims is unlawful content.

A report on Bloomberg.com claims Mosley’s lawyers filed a suit in a French Court, asking Google to create filters that could identify and remove content referencing “Nazi-themed” sex parties in association with Mosley.  A lawsuit has also been filed in Hamburg, Germany.

In response to the lawsuit, Google’s associate general counsel authored a blog post saying, “True responsibility for unlawful content lies with the people who produce it,” and asked the French and German courts to reject Mosley’s lawsuit.

According to Keller:

We sympathize with Mr. Mosley, and with anyone who believes their rights have been violated. We offer well-established tools to help people remove specific pages from our search results when those pages have clearly been determined to violate the law. In fact, we have removed hundreds of pages for Mr. Mosley, and stand ready to remove others he identifies.

Google claims that the E-Commerce Directive already has rules in place that were constructed specifically to handle such content concerns without limiting the freedom of expression online. Google says that a ruling in Mosley’s favor would create an “unprecedented new Internet censorship tool,” and impose, “an alarming new model of automated censorship.”

Google points out that any censorship tool created to identify and block unlawful content from search results would not solve the problem. Not only would the content still be available to access by other means, including following links posted on other sites or directly typing the content’s URL address into a browser, but the filter may block lawful content. “A set of words or images may break the law in one context,” writes Keller, “but be lawful in another.”

The Bloomberg.com article claims Mosley won 60,000 pounds for a similar lawsuit filed in a UK court in 2008 against the former News Corp. that published a related story, and, again, won a ruling in France in 2011, forcing News Corp. to pay Mosley another 32,000 euros in fines.

A lawyer connected to Mosley’s case told Bloomberg.com, “The case is very important, not only for Mr. Mosley, also generally for the protection of people’s dignity and privacy on the Internet.”

“This is not just a case about Google, but the entire Internet industry,” writes Google’s associate counsel, “If Mr. Mosley’s proposal prevails, any start-up could face the same daunting and expensive obligation to build new censorship tools.”

Related Topics: Channel: Industry | Google: Critics | Google: Privacy | Legal: Censorship | Legal: Privacy

Sponsored


About The Author: is Third Door Media's General Assignment Correspondent, and reports on the latest news and updates for Marketing Land and Search Engine Land. From 2009 to 2012, she was an award-winning syndicated columnist for a number of daily newspapers from New York to Texas. With more than ten years of marketing management experience, she has contributed to a variety of traditional and online publications, including MarketingProfs.com, SoftwareCEO.com, and Sales and Marketing Management Magazine. Read more of Amy's articles.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • nickdavison

    For one I agree with Google, This could set a dangerous precedent for censorship where those with the money to hire top lawyers are able to whitewash their wrongs. If Mosley did not want videos of him having sex dressed as a Nazi posted on the internet, then maybe Not having sex dressed as a Nazi whilst being filmed would have been a good idea. If he wants the videos taken down then he should approach those hosting the material.

    Why should Google be forced to develop a filter for his benefit at their own expense? And if they do have to, then where does this stop? Can businesses then apply to have negative but honest feedback filtered?

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide