<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google TV Ads: Google Brings Auction Model To TV Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/google-tv-ads-google-brings-auction-model-to-tv-advertising-10884/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-tv-ads-google-brings-auction-model-to-tv-advertising-10884</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:18:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-tv-ads-google-brings-auction-model-to-tv-advertising-10884/comment-page-1#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-tv-ads-google-brings-auction-model-to-tv-advertising-10884.php#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that -- fixed the URL.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that &#8212; fixed the URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ketan</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-tv-ads-google-brings-auction-model-to-tv-advertising-10884/comment-page-1#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>Ketan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-tv-ads-google-brings-auction-model-to-tv-advertising-10884.php#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>What is the reason that you have the url for astound.net typed in as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.astound.net/?gclid=CNTsp8eDpYsCFQvShgodBS6xeQ&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.astound.net/?gclid=CNTsp8eDpYsCFQvShgodBS6xeQ&lt;/a&gt;
? Just curious to know.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the reason that you have the url for astound.net typed in as <a href="http://www.astound.net/?gclid=CNTsp8eDpYsCFQvShgodBS6xeQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.astound.net/?gclid=CNTsp8eDpYsCFQvShgodBS6xeQ</a><br />
? Just curious to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Biri</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-tv-ads-google-brings-auction-model-to-tv-advertising-10884/comment-page-1#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Biri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 06:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-tv-ads-google-brings-auction-model-to-tv-advertising-10884.php#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>Some first thoughts after reading this piece of news:

1) The type of advertisers who will opt for this are the &quot;branding&quot; types as it might be difficult for &quot;direct response&quot; types to get good results given the fact that they cannot know for sure if/when exactly their ads are going to run unless they guarantee it by placing a ridiculously high bid.

The &quot;branding&quot; advertising style cannot be measured by numbers alone like in instances when a company wants to remind the public about its leadership in a given category

2) I admire Google for trying out all these new advertising concepts. If they fail, it&#039;s a little money wasted and some lesson learned but if they succeed it&#039;s a flood of riches and a guaranteed leadership. If I remember well, Adwords was an experiment and we all know how it made Google, GOOGLE.

3) Can anyone please help define what Google is as a company? Most people, especially the average Internet user, will call it a search engine but what about us industry &quot;insiders&quot;?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some first thoughts after reading this piece of news:</p>
<p>1) The type of advertisers who will opt for this are the &#8220;branding&#8221; types as it might be difficult for &#8220;direct response&#8221; types to get good results given the fact that they cannot know for sure if/when exactly their ads are going to run unless they guarantee it by placing a ridiculously high bid.</p>
<p>The &#8220;branding&#8221; advertising style cannot be measured by numbers alone like in instances when a company wants to remind the public about its leadership in a given category</p>
<p>2) I admire Google for trying out all these new advertising concepts. If they fail, it&#8217;s a little money wasted and some lesson learned but if they succeed it&#8217;s a flood of riches and a guaranteed leadership. If I remember well, Adwords was an experiment and we all know how it made Google, GOOGLE.</p>
<p>3) Can anyone please help define what Google is as a company? Most people, especially the average Internet user, will call it a search engine but what about us industry &#8220;insiders&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
