<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Updates &amp; Details Webmaster Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-details-webmaster-guidelines-11390/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-details-webmaster-guidelines-11390</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-details-webmaster-guidelines-11390/comment-page-1#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-updates-details-webmaster-guidelines-11390.php#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>Yep John, that&#039;s so new that I didn&#039;t (yet) covered it in my first take on the update;) Well, the news is old though, at least when you consider Matt&#039;s blog posts official announcements.

What I like is that the Googlers in charge really tried to write for their audience, that is Webmasters and Web developers, not (only) search geeks. Hence the news is that Google really cares. Since the revamp is a funded project, I guess the few paragraphs where the guidelines are still mysterious for the great unwashed, or even potentially misleading, will get corrected soon.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep John, that&#8217;s so new that I didn&#8217;t (yet) covered it in my first take on the update;) Well, the news is old though, at least when you consider Matt&#8217;s blog posts official announcements.</p>
<p>What I like is that the Googlers in charge really tried to write for their audience, that is Webmasters and Web developers, not (only) search geeks. Hence the news is that Google really cares. Since the revamp is a funded project, I guess the few paragraphs where the guidelines are still mysterious for the great unwashed, or even potentially misleading, will get corrected soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLH</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-details-webmaster-guidelines-11390/comment-page-1#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>JLH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-updates-details-webmaster-guidelines-11390.php#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>Reporting of paid links is new, I think.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66736&amp;topic=8524&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66736&amp;topic=8524&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reporting of paid links is new, I think.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66736&#038;topic=8524" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66736&#038;topic=8524</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crimsongirl</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-details-webmaster-guidelines-11390/comment-page-1#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>crimsongirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-updates-details-webmaster-guidelines-11390.php#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>So basically - nothing new?

I mean, this is what we&#039;ve been hearing for years.  No changes in tactics needed for SEO types.

The only thing that gets me is &quot;Don&#039;t send automated queries&quot;.  How do they know the queries are from the person who owns/controls the site?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically &#8211; nothing new?</p>
<p>I mean, this is what we&#8217;ve been hearing for years.  No changes in tactics needed for SEO types.</p>
<p>The only thing that gets me is &#8220;Don&#8217;t send automated queries&#8221;.  How do they know the queries are from the person who owns/controls the site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
