<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wants DOJ To Continue Microsoft Antitrust Restrictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/google-wants-doj-to-continue-microsoft-antitrust-restrictions-11556/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-wants-doj-to-continue-microsoft-antitrust-restrictions-11556</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-wants-doj-to-continue-microsoft-antitrust-restrictions-11556/comment-page-1#comment-3028</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-wants-doj-to-continue-microsoft-antitrust-restrictions-11556.php#comment-3028</guid>
		<description>Wow - so many &quot;fights&quot; on the search engines. I like that, bet you do, too. Now the thing I&#039;ve been thinking about is how nice things would be if we had 10-15 big players within the search area, not just Google, Yahoo, MSN and AOL. I mean, we now have the big 4, and i&#039;d love to see other names in. There are some guys in Australia (but they&#039;ve been already bought by Google) - I&#039;m referring to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mylivesearch.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mylivesearch.com&lt;/a&gt;

Are there any promises expect the brand new Ask?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; so many &#8220;fights&#8221; on the search engines. I like that, bet you do, too. Now the thing I&#8217;ve been thinking about is how nice things would be if we had 10-15 big players within the search area, not just Google, Yahoo, MSN and AOL. I mean, we now have the big 4, and i&#8217;d love to see other names in. There are some guys in Australia (but they&#8217;ve been already bought by Google) &#8211; I&#8217;m referring to <a href="http://www.mylivesearch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mylivesearch.com</a></p>
<p>Are there any promises expect the brand new Ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky Lester</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-wants-doj-to-continue-microsoft-antitrust-restrictions-11556/comment-page-1#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/google-wants-doj-to-continue-microsoft-antitrust-restrictions-11556.php#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>And I can just see the little Google lawyers wringing their hands in the court room as they quote the classic line from the movie Wizard of Oz… “and I’ll get your little dog too!”  FADE TO BLACK WITH VOICE OVER OF MANIACAL CACKLING
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I can just see the little Google lawyers wringing their hands in the court room as they quote the classic line from the movie Wizard of Oz… “and I’ll get your little dog too!”  FADE TO BLACK WITH VOICE OVER OF MANIACAL CACKLING</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
