<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Brin Calls China Censorship A &#8220;Net Negative&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/googles-brin-calls-china-censorship-a-net-negative-10377/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-brin-calls-china-censorship-a-net-negative-10377</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dangerlarson</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-brin-calls-china-censorship-a-net-negative-10377/comment-page-1#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>dangerlarson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-brin-calls-china-censorship-a-net-negative-10377.php#comment-873</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good that they feel regret - they should listen to that &quot;still small voice&quot; within telling them that they dropped the ball. Perhaps not agreeing to comprimise may have set them back a bit in the Chinese markets, but you can&#039;t stop ideas. They&#039;re like air... or poison gas as the Chinese government may have one believe.

Sure it&#039;s easy for me to say &quot;stick to your guns&quot; and forget the money, but I think Google founders know that the overall impact of the Internet on the future of this planet and Google&#039;s role in shaping it will be far more important in the long run than profits.

Regardless of where one believes they go when they die, you don&#039;t take it with you :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that they feel regret &#8211; they should listen to that &#8220;still small voice&#8221; within telling them that they dropped the ball. Perhaps not agreeing to comprimise may have set them back a bit in the Chinese markets, but you can&#8217;t stop ideas. They&#8217;re like air&#8230; or poison gas as the Chinese government may have one believe.</p>
<p>Sure it&#8217;s easy for me to say &#8220;stick to your guns&#8221; and forget the money, but I think Google founders know that the overall impact of the Internet on the future of this planet and Google&#8217;s role in shaping it will be far more important in the long run than profits.</p>
<p>Regardless of where one believes they go when they die, you don&#8217;t take it with you :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BODYGUARDS</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-brin-calls-china-censorship-a-net-negative-10377/comment-page-1#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>BODYGUARDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-brin-calls-china-censorship-a-net-negative-10377.php#comment-872</guid>
		<description>What is not clear is if they are saying it was better to not do any  business in China - unless complete search freedom was given.


Sometimes, it is better to initially compromise to get into the door - then negotiate little by little.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is not clear is if they are saying it was better to not do any  business in China &#8211; unless complete search freedom was given.</p>
<p>Sometimes, it is better to initially compromise to get into the door &#8211; then negotiate little by little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
