Comments on: Google’s New Navigational Links: An Illustrated Guide http://searchengineland.com/googles-new-navigational-links-an-illustrated-guide-11233 Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing & Search Engines Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: tagZar http://searchengineland.com/googles-new-navigational-links-an-illustrated-guide-11233/comment-page-1#comment-2476 tagZar Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:35:07 +0000 http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-new-navigational-links-an-illustrated-guide-11233.php#comment-2476 Interesting to see where they are going - thanks for the info! Interesting to see where they are going – thanks for the info!

]]> By: zdavatz http://searchengineland.com/googles-new-navigational-links-an-illustrated-guide-11233/comment-page-1#comment-2475 zdavatz Fri, 18 May 2007 12:20:42 +0000 http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-new-navigational-links-an-illustrated-guide-11233.php#comment-2475 Nice nice-to-have-stuff for Google. The thing I do not like about the common search engines is, that they do not recognize documents with similar content. It happens often on the Web that a post or document is spread out over more then 50 websites. Now that is great for the author but not for the searcher because it blows up your search result unnecessarily. With InfoCodex this will not happen because the linguistical database recognizes similar documents and puts them into groups. This does not blow up your search result unnecessarily. <a href="http://www.ywesee.com/pmwiki.php/Ywesee/InfoCodexProcedure" rel="nofollow">http://www.ywesee.com/pmwiki.php/Ywesee/InfoCodexProcedure</a> Three things a modern Search engine should do: 1. Automatically classify a document according to its content. 2. Automatically generate an abstract of a document. 3. Generate a Heat-Map of the Contents of a Search Result. <a href="http://www.ywesee.com/uploads/Main/InfoCodex_22.2.2007.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ywesee.com/uploads/Main/InfoCodex_22.2.2007.pdf</a> Nice nice-to-have-stuff for Google.

The thing I do not like about the common search engines is, that they do not recognize documents with similar content. It happens often on the Web that a post or document is spread out over more then 50 websites. Now that is great for the author but not for the searcher because it blows up your search result unnecessarily. With InfoCodex this will not happen because the linguistical database recognizes similar documents and puts them into groups. This does not blow up your search result unnecessarily.

http://www.ywesee.com/pmwiki.php/Ywesee/InfoCodexProcedure

Three things a modern Search engine should do:

1. Automatically classify a document according to its content.
2. Automatically generate an abstract of a document.
3. Generate a Heat-Map of the Contents of a Search Result.

http://www.ywesee.com/uploads/Main/InfoCodex_22.2.2007.pdf

]]> By: M.K.Jackson http://searchengineland.com/googles-new-navigational-links-an-illustrated-guide-11233/comment-page-1#comment-2474 M.K.Jackson Thu, 17 May 2007 03:14:00 +0000 http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-new-navigational-links-an-illustrated-guide-11233.php#comment-2474 So will people actually see the navigation links now? The universal is there to somewhat replace it, but I think google could do a better job of educating people about what's available. Their service is even better than most of their users ever realize So will people actually see the navigation links now? The universal is there to somewhat replace it, but I think google could do a better job of educating people about what’s available. Their service is even better than most of their users ever realize

]]>