<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s T-Mobile Ad On Why To Do SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Teddie</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474/comment-page-1#comment-2897</link>
		<dc:creator>Teddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474.php#comment-2897</guid>
		<description>Google says SEO is vital...that&#039;ll keep me cheerful all week. Thanks Danny.

It&#039;s interesting that this appeared in a mobile phone magazine, with a clear visual reference to mobile search, perhaps Google was hinting that they want more optimised mobile content because our studies which featured in Revolution magazine in February have shown that mobile friendly search content is generally non-existent (much less than 5% of normal web content), most brands don&#039;t feature, or the quality of the results and websites is attrocious?

Even with the transcoder which does some good work, more appropriate optimised mobile content would help them out a lot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google says SEO is vital&#8230;that&#8217;ll keep me cheerful all week. Thanks Danny.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that this appeared in a mobile phone magazine, with a clear visual reference to mobile search, perhaps Google was hinting that they want more optimised mobile content because our studies which featured in Revolution magazine in February have shown that mobile friendly search content is generally non-existent (much less than 5% of normal web content), most brands don&#8217;t feature, or the quality of the results and websites is attrocious?</p>
<p>Even with the transcoder which does some good work, more appropriate optimised mobile content would help them out a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474/comment-page-1#comment-2896</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474.php#comment-2896</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s how optimization is spelled in the UK.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s how optimization is spelled in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474/comment-page-1#comment-2895</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474.php#comment-2895</guid>
		<description>Did they spell optimization wrong or is that a UK thing?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they spell optimization wrong or is that a UK thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rustybrick</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474/comment-page-1#comment-2894</link>
		<dc:creator>rustybrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474.php#comment-2894</guid>
		<description>Ha, thanks for sharing...

Maybe readers can hire Avenue A/Razorfish to help with their SEO work?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, thanks for sharing&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe readers can hire Avenue A/Razorfish to help with their SEO work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Lenssen</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474/comment-page-1#comment-2893</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Lenssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474.php#comment-2893</guid>
		<description>&quot;keywords relating to your business should appear regularly in the content&quot;

What a brilliant idea, to have a company homepage where one talks about the company business! I would also suggest hyperlinks pointing to your world wide web product pages to make it really stand out!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;keywords relating to your business should appear regularly in the content&#8221;</p>
<p>What a brilliant idea, to have a company homepage where one talks about the company business! I would also suggest hyperlinks pointing to your world wide web product pages to make it really stand out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mollermarketing</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474/comment-page-1#comment-2892</link>
		<dc:creator>mollermarketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/googles-t-mobile-ad-on-why-to-do-seo-11474.php#comment-2892</guid>
		<description>About a month and a half ago I read a post at an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eplanit.biz/blog/?p=285&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEO Blog&lt;/a&gt; that said Google was leaning towards banning paid links.  Is that still true? And if it is, it&#039;s kind of interesting that they are promoting you to &quot;buy&quot; Adwords listings with them.  Isn&#039;t that a bit contradictory?   What&#039;s Google&#039;s official stand?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About a month and a half ago I read a post at an <a href="http://www.eplanit.biz/blog/?p=285" rel="nofollow">SEO Blog</a> that said Google was leaning towards banning paid links.  Is that still true? And if it is, it&#8217;s kind of interesting that they are promoting you to &#8220;buy&#8221; Adwords listings with them.  Isn&#8217;t that a bit contradictory?   What&#8217;s Google&#8217;s official stand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
