<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help Google Find &#8216;Empty Review Sites&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/help-google-find-empty-review-sites-16138/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/help-google-find-empty-review-sites-16138</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:39:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/help-google-find-empty-review-sites-16138/comment-page-1#comment-4488</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=16138#comment-4488</guid>
		<description>Am I right in thinking that Google is admitting here that they are not able to discern quality content?

They tell us to build quality pages, then go and rank pages based to a great extent on popularity, and now they&#039;re asking us for a hand weeding out low grade pages.

Am I the only one that thinks this is ironic?   

They&#039;ve got enough money.   If they pay me, I&#039;ll do their hand editing and cover the shortcomings of their algorithm.

Why focus on reviews of consumer junk anyway?   I would prefer a move that deranks crappy Wikipedia pages and puts articles of greater merit above them in the SERPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I right in thinking that Google is admitting here that they are not able to discern quality content?</p>
<p>They tell us to build quality pages, then go and rank pages based to a great extent on popularity, and now they&#8217;re asking us for a hand weeding out low grade pages.</p>
<p>Am I the only one that thinks this is ironic?   </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve got enough money.   If they pay me, I&#8217;ll do their hand editing and cover the shortcomings of their algorithm.</p>
<p>Why focus on reviews of consumer junk anyway?   I would prefer a move that deranks crappy Wikipedia pages and puts articles of greater merit above them in the SERPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.238 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 10:05:28 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
