<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Spotplex&#8217;s &#8220;Trafficracy&#8221; Could Beat Digg But Probably Won&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/how-spotplexs-trafficracy-could-beat-digg-but-probably-wont-10640/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/how-spotplexs-trafficracy-could-beat-digg-but-probably-wont-10640</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:37:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neuro</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/how-spotplexs-trafficracy-could-beat-digg-but-probably-wont-10640/comment-page-1#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>Neuro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/how-spotplexs-trafficracy-could-beat-digg-but-probably-wont-10640.php#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>
Hi Guys

Seen the story on Wired yet about buying diggs?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/internet/0,72832-0.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/internet/0,72832-0.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys</p>
<p>Seen the story on Wired yet about buying diggs?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/internet/0,72832-0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/news/technology/internet/0,72832-0.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Visser</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/how-spotplexs-trafficracy-could-beat-digg-but-probably-wont-10640/comment-page-1#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Visser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/how-spotplexs-trafficracy-could-beat-digg-but-probably-wont-10640.php#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>Spotplex looks like an obvious progression, we have similar polls for top blog ranks using banner images placed on blogs and judged by visitor access rates.

Pity involvement during their beta period is invitation only though. Hang on, I&#039;m angry that they&#039;re not letting me use software that&#039;s currently less than complete, when did our mind-sets switch?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotplex looks like an obvious progression, we have similar polls for top blog ranks using banner images placed on blogs and judged by visitor access rates.</p>
<p>Pity involvement during their beta period is invitation only though. Hang on, I&#8217;m angry that they&#8217;re not letting me use software that&#8217;s currently less than complete, when did our mind-sets switch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
