How One Brand Switched A Million URLs & Lived To Tell About It: 5 Questions With HomeAdvisor.com

5-QuestionsLast year, home improvement company HomeAdvisor.com underwent a monumental rebranding effort that included switching more than 10 million URLS from their previous company name to their new brand.

With over $200 million in revenue at risk and thirteen years worth of online brand equity, HomeAdvisor.com’s CEO Chris Terrill and CTO Brandon Ridenour understood switching the site’s URL would be a major undertaking, but necessary to establish the best foundation for building a stronger online brand presence.

“We needed to narrow our brand’s focus,” said Terrill, “We know it’s the strongest brands that are going to survive on Google.”

After a thorough amount of research, the company determined its former name ‘ServiceMagic’ did not resonate well with homeowners, nor did it offer a lot of value when it came to their SEO efforts. The company needed their brand’s focus to be on home maintenance, improvement and repairs. According to their findings, HomeAdvisor.com won in four separate research tests.

HomeAdvisor

Once Terrill and Ridenour committed to the rebrand, Ridenour researched a number of case studies on companies that had performed URL switchovers, and discovered one of the most common mistakes was executing the site redesign and URL switch all at once.

“It takes time for Google to index 10 million pages,” said Ridenour. According to the CTO, HomeAdvisor.com’s new website went live last September, but the company waited three months before switching to their new URL, isolating the URL change from site’s redesign.

“The less the search engines have to digest, the better chance they quickly and clearly associate your new domain with your old domain, and transfer associated domain strength and history accordingly,” says Ridenour.

With more than a year’s worth of planning, Terrill and Ridenour say it took the new URL five months to fully recover and gain back their previous domain’s rankings. Now that they have survived the URL switchover, the two are offering their insight on what it takes to lead a successful online rebranding effort.

5 Questions with HomeAdvisor.com’s CEO Chris Terrill and CTO Brandon Ridenour

Amy Gesenhues: What was the primary reason HomeAdvisor.com elected to switch their URL, and, once the decision was made, what did the project entail?

Chris Terrill & Brandon Ridenour

Chris Terrill & Brandon Ridenour

Chris Terrill: The change of our URL was the final piece of a much broader overall brand change. We launched several large quantitative brand surveys and tests to determine if ServiceMagic was the best name for our new narrowed focus on the home repair/maintenance space. In all four tests, HomeAdvisor significantly beat ServiceMagic and was consistently the top choice amongst homeowners, so the decision was driven by consumer preference.

I certainly wouldn’t recommend that anyone casually change their brand and would suggest not doing so unless it is part of a bigger strategic initiative to position yourself in a new or existing market. As the Internet space matures, I think you will see more online brand changes (no different than the brand changes that have always occurred offline), but effectively managing SEO during a brand switch creates a wrinkle that is unique to online focused brands.

Brandon Ridenour: The URL switch was combined with a corporate rebranding effort, and the entire process took about a year. We began planning the URL cut-over aspect and associated search engine impacts from the very beginning. The core team that focused on the URL switch numbered less than 10, while the broader rebranding effort probably numbered closer to 100. The execution was done in two phases with a redesign and rebrand coming first, and a final URL cut-over following a few months later. The idea was to allow the search engines time to digest the new design, and to isolate the URL change as much as possible.

Amy Gesenhues: What was the worst “Oh no – we didn’t expect that to happen!” moment during the project, and what could you have done differently to avoid it?

Brandon Ridenour: The biggest “Oh no” moment was a Friday morning when our site completely disappeared from the Google index. Even searching for our brand directly didn’t yield a result for our homepage nor for our site. This Google “outage” lasted four days, and it’s fair to say those were four of the longest days of the year. Technically, we were still in the Google index, but there were no searches that would return us as a result. The problem self-resolved on the fifth day, and according to Google, we did not receive any penalty.

Amy Gesenhues: Can you tell us more about your organic SEO results before and after you switched URLs, e.g. where did you rank prior to the switchover and how far did the site drop before it recovered?

Chris Terrill: We had 13 years of SEO equity in the ServiceMagic domain and ranked highly for organic search. We estimated a 30 to 50 percent range in loss of traffic, and we generally stayed within that range both in terms of the lower levels of the drop and the overall recovery time. The biggest challenge in terms of looking at pre and post change SEO positioning is due to the broader changes Google made to their local listings during that same period. In some areas we are as strong or stronger, and in other areas, Google’s local listings have reduced our positions.

Amy Gesenhues: During the project, were there any scenarios you feared that ended up not being a problem, or any unexpected setbacks you that proved more difficult than planned?

Brandon Ridenour: Other than the disappearance of our site from Google for those four days, the process largely went as we expected. The depth and duration of the traffic loss from the search engines tilted toward the more severe end of our forecasts, which was unfortunate, but was within the range of our expectations. At the same time, largely every challenge we expected to face did, in fact, play out as we expected.

Amy Gesenhues: Now that the project is complete, how is HomeAdvisor.com performing, and what is the best advice you can offer another brand considering switching their URL?

Brandon Ridenour: About five months after our initial URL switch, we saw very nearly a full organic traffic recovery from the main search engines. Most of the recovery occurred in three or four large steps, with the last 30 percent or so happening essentially overnight in the fifth month. At this point, I would say we are roughly at 90 percent strength versus our old domain.

Chris Terrill: [I would advise] a rigorous plan that is realistic, well staged and meticulously managed. A haphazard change that is bundled into a broader site redesign is a recipe for disaster, particularly for a more well established site with solid SEO equity. While the technology team will bear the brunt of the actual domain switch, the entire organization needs to be on board, buttoned up and have eyes wide open relative to what it takes to make a successful transition. There are as many sound reasons not to make any changes as there are to make a change, so any CEO thinking about going down this path needs to have the entire team fully on board.

Brandon Ridenour: In terms of advice, for any company with a very broad web presence (e.g. millions of pages) and heavy reliance on SEO, I would suggest not underestimating the costs and duration required to successfully switch to a new URL, as we believe those costs are largely unavoidable. In our case, as is common with rebrands, we largely understood these costs and considered them in the overall rationale and business case for the rebrand itself.

In terms of execution, following Google guidelines for moving your website to a new URL and other best practices are key. Most importantly, we also believe it is crucial to isolate the URL change apart in time from any web design or structural site architecture changes.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Features: 5 Questions With | Google: SEO | Search Marketing | SEO: General | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is Third Door Media's General Assignment Correspondent, and reports on the latest news and updates for Marketing Land and Search Engine Land. From 2009 to 2012, she was an award-winning syndicated columnist for a number of daily newspapers from New York to Texas. With more than ten years of marketing management experience, she has contributed to a variety of traditional and online publications, including MarketingProfs.com, SoftwareCEO.com, and Sales and Marketing Management Magazine. Read more of Amy's articles.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Andrew Shotland

    One of the best articles I have read on SEL for a while. Nice work Amy.

  • http://www.keshkesh.com/ Takeshi Young

    Very interesting case study! I guess SEOMoz decided to take a more brazen approach :p

  • http://www.zooron.com/ Sam Hamilton

    Did Moz say how much traffic they lost? I always hear about this 20-50% number but who else has reported this on a high traffic site?

  • http://www.keshkesh.com/ Takeshi Young

    They lost around 20% of their search traffic, and still haven’t seen a full recovery as far as I know:
    http://moz.com/rand/10-traffic-graphs-seomoz-moz-domain-migration/

  • http://babypickel.com/vincenzo.html Chenzo

    I agree Andrew – great case study and also a very big project to have done a story on.

  • http://www.samharries.com/ Sam Harries

    Interesting case study. 90% strength is a fantastic claim for something this size. Still eagerly awaiting announcements from Yoast and crew regarding TheGuardian’s migration.

  • Sean Lim

    why wouldnt redirect 301 retain the original seo juice?

  • http://www.dburnsdesign.com/ Anisha Fonville

    Great article, Amy! Definitely one of the best posts I’ve read in a while. There’s no doubt at all that this was a very well planned and executed move by the Home Advisor SEOs.

  • http://www.ematters.nl/ Arjan Bakker

    Nice accomplishment. If they would only built the website even better? Website speed is slow. (check using gtmetrix.com) Ever heard of richsnippets, OGP? No XML sitemaps?

  • Brandon Ridenour

    Hi Eamon – unfortunately, with a change of this magnitude, there are few contingency or back-out plans. Hence, one needs to have their ducks in a row going into it. It’s a bit like cliff diving i guess!

  • Brandon Ridenour

    Sean — 301 redirects are a key component of executing the change. However, ultimately your old links are de-indexed while the new links/urls are indexed. Ultimately, the new urls derive their ranking strength from more factors than just the old redirected urls. Most of the traffic loss ultimately occurs as a result of old URLs being de-indexed.

  • Brandon Ridenour

    Anisha — thanks! We were very lucky to have the leadership of several people who are experts in both SEO and in the local search space leading our planning and execution. They did a terrific job and deserve all the credit.

  • Myron_Rosmarin

    Nice piece! Kudos to Chris Terrill and Brandon Ridenour for sharing their experiences.

  • Ronnie’s Mustache

    Really interesting- thank you!

    I’ve been through some big rebranding / URL changes and as mentioned in the article, you need to be realistic. You WILL lose some rankings for a short period of time. But there are ways to supplement the traffic, and they often turn out to be good long term plays that continue to produce after you’ve reclaimed your SE positions/traffic.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide