Less Than 5% Click Fraud Makes You “Virtually Free”

When the search engines and auditing firms don’t even agree on an overall industry rate of click fraud, I was bemused by a release I got today telling me that ABCSearch is now "validated as virtually free of click fraud" according to Click Defense. Virtually free to me means practically none. Like well below one percent, I would say.

Turns out, virtually free for this validation means "an average of less than 5 percent potential click fraud across its entire PPC search network."

In contrast, compared to the major search engines, "This represents a three-fold decrease in recent documented reports for tier one PPC networks."

Hmm — three fold? That’s got to be a reference to the Click Forensics Click Fraud Index stats. We just reported on the latest findings from those that gave an overall industry figure of around that range — 14.8 percent.

Of course, those figures are hotly disputed by Google, since they don’t cover refunds that are given. Indeed, Google says actual click fraud is around 0.02% of clicks. Google: Click Fraud Is 0.02% Of Clicks explains this more, and Yahoo Says 12 to 15 Percent Of Clicks Are Discounted covers a similar issue with Yahoo, where clicks are filtered out.

Now back to the ABCSearch release. Look again at what I quoted, and you’ll see the rate is for "potential" click fraud, rather than actual click fraud. So the ABCSearch’s actual click fraud rate might be much lower (or higher, if the screening technology isn’t detecting click fraud correctly). And the major search engines could indeed have a higher "potential" rate of click fraud

Potential click fraud is important, because to my understanding, that’s really what the Click Forensics Click Fraud Index provides — a look at potential threats, not actual click fraud.

You could be forgiven for assuming that the Click Fraud Index is reporting actual click fraud, since the site makes it seem that way. From the most recent findings reported:

The overall industry average click fraud rate was 14.8 percent for Q1 2007 versus 13.7 percent for the same quarter in 2006 and 14.2 percent for Q4 of 2006, 13.8 percent for Q3 of 2006, 14.1 percent for Q2 of 2006, respectively.

There you have it. "Click fraud rate" for the "overall industry," as I’ve bolded. What surprises me is that these statements aren’t given with better qualification.

When the Click Fraud Index was first launched back in 2006, I wrote:

The big caveat to keep in mind is that this rate only takes into account data from those who are part of the Click Fraud Network, which is backed by click fraud auditing company Click Forensics. The company does say this one the Click Fraud Index page, but despite this, some might assume the figures represent an industry-wide estimate.

That prompted Click Forensics CEO Tom Cuthbert to reply:

We make no claim that the data reflects an industry of over 400,000 advertisers. In fact, the text below the graph on the Click Fraud Index home page says, "Derived using average threat level across all industries and keywords monitored by the Click Fraud Network. Threat Level is identified as having a high attribute rating score as measured by the Click Forensics rating engine using data provided by members of the Click Fraud Network"….

I thought it might be helpful if I give you an overview of our approach. Click Forensics definition of click fraud is the combined scoring of three (3) sets of attributes; technical, behavioral and Market (economic). We add to that the collective intelligence provided by the Click Fraud Network member data. Each click is scored by our algorithm and flagged in a high, medium or low threat level. The total number of clicks falling into the high threat level is the number we report on the Click Fraud Index site….

One other key point so that the CFN aggregate number is not misleading. We are counting number of high threat clicks. Bear in mind that the average cost per click for a high threat level click is three to four times higher than low threat level clicks.

I agree with you, "…it’s hard to take this figure alone as proof of the state of the entire industry." While that is clearly not what we are saying at this point, it is a goal. As I mentioned, the more the Network grows the more accurate the data will become. This is an industry problem and I invite you to join our efforts.

A year later, that index is most definitely positioned as providing overall industry figures, rather than just being reflective of the Click Fraud Network’s 3,500 advertisers. In addition, references to "threat levels" no longer appear, removing any qualification that it is potential click fraud that’s been reported on, rather than actual click fraud.

Potential figures can be useful — but it’s important that you really understand when potential is being discussed.

Related Topics: Channel: SEM | Legal: Clickfraud

Sponsored


About The Author: is a Founding Editor of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also serves as Chief Content Officer for Third Door Media, which publishes Search Engine Land and produces the SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He has a personal blog called Daggle (and keeps his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.traffick.com AndrewGoodman

    Fraud protection or not, as 4-5 years ago, the best place for an advertiser to start their research is here:

    http://www.abcsearch.com/advertisers.php?sec=network

    It looks like the ABC network is a combination of low-volume, “OK” partners, and a number of questionable, low quality partners.

    Is it worth the bother? Many advertisers will conclude no, and assume that if the click fraud is being filtered, then the remainder of the traffic will amount to a handful of decent clicks mixed in with the lowest quality clicks the network feels they can get away with selling.

  • crimsongirl

    Ha, I got so many questionable clicks from abcsearch.com (when I used Ask’s advertising platform most of the clicks came from abcsearch), that as an experiment I applied to become an affiliate. I took one of my sites that gets maybe 15 visitors/month and applied for it to be an abcsearch.com affiliate. On the questionairre it asked “where will you get traffic from” and I wrote: friends and family.

    I thought this was so outlandish they could never accept me, but to my surprise, my application was approved! They will take anyone.

  • http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ Matt Cutts

    It’s interesting to me which part of a story will attract your eye. I checked out the press release at http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=242908
    and had forgotten that Daniel Yomtobian was the CEO of ABCSearch.

  • http://abcsearch.com Simon Chernin

    ABCSearch only accepts publishers with legitimate traffic and does not discriminate against anyone based on number of visitors or how you’ve heard of us. Yahoo and Google make the content providers jump through hoops, ABCSearch aggregates smaller publishers while upholding quality for the advertisers. We welcome anyone to see the quality for themselves with a free $100 in traffic: http://www.abcsearch.com/cgi-bin/referadvfree.pl?referrerId=selb

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide