<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Land &#187; Stats: Hitwise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/library/stats/stats-hitwise/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:45:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Hitwise: &#8220;Facebook&#8221; Was 4 Of Top 10 Search Queries In 2011</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-facebook-was-4-of-top-10-search-queries-of-2011-105482</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-facebook-was-4-of-top-10-search-queries-of-2011-105482#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Sterling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search & Society: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=105482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the major engines themselves, Experian Hitwise announced the top search terms of 2011. The company looked at the top 1,000 search queries of 2011 and found that Facebook topped the list for the third year in a row. Overall Facebook had four of the top 10 search terms for 2011, the same as in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-105493" style="margin: 4px;" title="Screen shot 2011-12-22 at 7.03.15 AM" src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/12/Screen-shot-2011-12-22-at-7.03.15-AM-300x128.png" alt="" width="216" height="92" />Following the major engines themselves, Experian Hitwise <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/us/about-us/press-center/press-releases/facebook-was-the-top-search-term-for-2011/">announced</a> the top search terms of 2011. The company looked at the top 1,000 search queries of 2011 and found that Facebook topped the list for the third year in a row.</p>
<p>Overall Facebook had four of the top 10 search terms for 2011, the same as in 2010. However query volume for the collection of Facebook terms grew 33 percent vs. last year.</p>
<p><strong>Top search queries of 2010 and 2011</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-105483" title="Screen shot 2011-12-22 at 6.40.43 AM" src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/12/Screen-shot-2011-12-22-at-6.40.43-AM-600x541.png" alt="" width="336" height="303" /></p>
<p>What&#8217;s noteworthy is that all of the top 10 are navigational queries. Beyond the top 10, Hitwise said that &#8220;social networking-related terms dominated the results, accounting for 4.18 percent of the top 50 searches. This is an increase of 12 percent compared with 2010.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to Hitwise, the top 10 websites visited in the US were the following:</p>
<ol>
<li>Facebook</li>
<li>Google</li>
<li>Youtube</li>
<li>Mail.yahoo.com</li>
<li>Yahoo</li>
<li>Bing</li>
<li>Search.yahoo.com</li>
<li>Gmail</li>
<li>Mail.live.com</li>
<li>MSN.com</li>
</ol>
<p>The biggest &#8220;mover&#8221; among the top 10 queries and websites was Myspace, which exited in accordance with its precipitous decline in traffic. There&#8217;s more analysis of the year&#8217;s top search queries by category in the Hitwise <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/us/about-us/press-center/press-releases/facebook-was-the-top-search-term-for-2011/">blog post</a>.</p>
<p>Curiously, Facebook doesn&#8217;t appear on any of the &#8220;top lists&#8221; issued by Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask or AOL (see below). With Google&#8217;s list, at least, it&#8217;s based on &#8220;rising&#8221; queries rather than those most popular overall.</p>
<p><strong>Related Entries</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="../../google-zeitgeist-2011-rebecca-black-lego-alien-steve-jobs-104776">Google Zeitgeist 2011: Rebecca Black, Lego Alien &amp; Steve Jobs</a></li>
<li><a href="../../2011-yahoo-in-review-top-us-searches-in-30-categories-103215">2011 Yahoo! In Review: Top US Searches In 30 Categories</a></li>
<li><a href="../../aol-in-2011-charlie-sheen-winning-over-other-celebrities-103076">AOL In 2011: Charlie Sheen #Winning Over Other Celebrities </a></li>
<li><a href="../../searching-for-answers-on-ask-com-in-2011-102850">Searching For Answers On Ask.com In 2011</a></li>
<li><a href="../../bieber-tops-bings-list-of-most-popular-searches-in-2011-102582">Bieber Tops Bing&#8217;s List Of Most Popular Searches In 2011</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-facebook-was-4-of-top-10-search-queries-of-2011-105482/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitwise: Bing-powered Search Share Inches Up; One-Word Queries Also Rising</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-bing-powered-search-share-inches-up-one-word-queries-also-rising-101349</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-bing-powered-search-share-inches-up-one-word-queries-also-rising-101349#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Search Behavior]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=101349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bing-powered search made small gains in U.S. market share during October, according to the latest Hitwise numbers. Bing gained 3% between September and October, going from 12.8% market share to 13.23%, while Yahoo also rose slightly from 15.27% to 15.39%. Combined, that boosted Bing-powered share among major search engines to 28.62% … still a far [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/11/hitwise-logo.gif" alt="hitwise-logo" width="170" height="75" class="alignright" />Bing-powered search made small gains in U.S. market share during October, according to the <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/us/about-us/press-center/press-releases/bing-powered-share-of-searches-at-29-percent">latest Hitwise numbers</a>. </p>
<p>Bing gained 3% between September and October, going from 12.8% market share to 13.23%, while Yahoo also rose slightly from 15.27% to 15.39%. Combined, that boosted Bing-powered share among major search engines to 28.62% … still a far cry from Google&#8217;s estimated 65.38% of the US search market.</p>
<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/11/hitwise-2011-nov-prcnt-us-searches-among-search-engines-450x236.jpg" alt="hitwise chart 1" width="450" height="236" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-101360" /></p>
<p>Meanwhile, more interesting to me is <strong>Hitwise&#8217;s take on search query lengths</strong>. In the same news release today, Hitwise estimates that 27.23% of searches were one word long in October. That number is up from 26.45% in September. Hitwise tells me this is desktop searches only &#8212; mobile search is not included. (Mobile is where you&#8217;d expect shorter queries to be more prevalent.)</p>
<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/11/hitwise-2011-nov-prcntg-us-clicks-nmbr-keywords-450x260.jpg" alt="hitwise chart 2" width="450" height="260" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-101361" /></p>
<p>Not much of a month-to-month gain, but a little over a year ago, I <a href="http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/long-tail-alive-well/3659/">wrote about query length</a> on my own blog and shared a Hitwise chart that covered searches in September 2010. Notice that, at the time, Hitwise estimated one-word searches to be only 22.72% of all queries.</p>
<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/11/hitwise-longtail.jpg" alt="hitwise-longtail" width="418" height="291" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-101362" /></p>
<p>So, over 13 months, Hitwise is saying that one-word search queries have risen from 22.72% to 27.23%. There are a lot of implications in that for business owners and marketers &#8212; implications that are best left for a separate article, or for the comments below if you prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-bing-powered-search-share-inches-up-one-word-queries-also-rising-101349/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitwise: Google Back Above 66% US Market Share</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-google-back-above-66-us-market-share-96677</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-google-back-above-66-us-market-share-96677#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Popularity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=96677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has inched back above the 66% market share threshold in the latest numbers from Experian Hitwise. And both Bing and Yahoo saw slight drops during the month of September. Hitwise explains that this is pretty normal: Google&#8217;s market share has risen for five of the past six Septembers, while Yahoo&#8217;s has declined in each [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has inched back above the 66% market share threshold in the <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/us/about-us/press-center/press-releases/google-share-of-searches-66-percent-in-sept-2011/">latest numbers</a> from Experian Hitwise. And both Bing and Yahoo saw slight drops during the month of September.</p>
<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/10/hitwise-sept11.png" alt="hitwise-sept11" width="495" height="265" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-96678" /></p>
<p>Hitwise explains that this is pretty normal: Google&#8217;s market share has risen for five of the past six Septembers, while Yahoo&#8217;s has declined in each of the past five Septembers. </p>
<p>It was just six months ago that Hitwise credited Bing-powered search &#8212; i.e., Bing and Yahoo together &#8212; with <a href="http://searchengineland.com/bing-yahoo-pass-30-search-engine-market-share-hitwise-says-72565">slightly more than 30% market share</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-google-back-above-66-us-market-share-96677/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Year Later, Bing-Powered Search Takes 4% Market Share From Google &#8211; Hitwise</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/one-year-later-bing-powered-search-takes-4-market-share-from-google-hitwise-92312</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/one-year-later-bing-powered-search-takes-4-market-share-from-google-hitwise-92312#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=92312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a year since Bing began powering the natural search results on Yahoo and the combination has gained a little more than 4% market share in the U.S. since then. Google has dropped more than six percentage points in the same time period. All of that is according to the latest Experian Hitwise report, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a year since Bing began powering the natural search results on Yahoo and the combination has gained a little more than 4% market share in the U.S. since then. Google has dropped more than six percentage points in the same time period. All of that is according to the <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/us/about-us/press-center/press-releases/bing-powered-share-of-searches-august-2011/">latest Experian Hitwise report</a>, which covers US search activity in August.</p>
<p>Hitwise says Bing-powered search accounted for 28.99% of all searches last month, up from 28.05% the previous month.</p>
<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/09/hitwise-august2011.png" alt="" title="hitwise-august2011" width="458" height="194" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92313" /></p>
<p>But in the bigger picture, Bing-powered search has upped its market share by about 4% since Yahoo began using Bing&#8217;s search results. That <a href="http://searchengineland.com/yahoos-transition-to-bing-organic-results-complete-49228">change was completed</a> back on August 24, 2010. A couple weeks after that, Experian Hitwise said that Bing and Yahoo had a <a href="http://searchengineland.com/bing-yahoo-combine-for-25-market-share-50021">combined 24.56% market share</a> in the U.S. during the first week of the partnership.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;d the Bing-Yahoo gains come from? According to the Hitwise numbers, they came at Google&#8217;s expense. In August 2010, Hitwise reported Google&#8217;s market share at 71.59%; as the chart above shows, that&#8217;s now down to about 65%.</p>
<p>Small gains? For sure. And that&#8217;s exactly what Microsoft CEO said in March 2010, when he <a href="http://searchengineland.com/liveblog-steve-ballmer-keynote-at-smx-west-37132">keynoted our SMX West conference</a>: &#8220;Tomorrow&#8217;s goal is to gain a few points, a tenth here, a tenth there, and just keep working and working.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/one-year-later-bing-powered-search-takes-4-market-share-from-google-hitwise-92312/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Plus: Big With Status-Seeking Singles; Losing Ground At Colleges &amp; Cafes</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/google-plus-lifestyle-segment-adoption-89321</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/google-plus-lifestyle-segment-adoption-89321#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google: Google+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=89321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conventional wisdom says that Google+ is big with the tech crowd and, more specifically, with males than females. But Experian Hitwise has a different way of looking at who&#8217;s using Google+. It doesn&#8217;t dispute the conventional wisdom, per se, but adds perhaps another perspective to the discussion. In a blog post today, Bill Tancer uses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/07/google-plus-logo-square.jpg" alt="google-plus-logo-square" width="200" height="193" />Conventional wisdom says that Google+ is big with the tech crowd and, more specifically, with males than females. But Experian Hitwise has a different way of looking at who&#8217;s using Google+. It doesn&#8217;t dispute the conventional wisdom, per se, but adds perhaps another perspective to the discussion.</p>
<p>In a <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2011/08/google_plus_innovators_and_ear.html">blog post today</a>, Bill Tancer uses the company&#8217;s &#8220;Mosaic&#8221; lifestyle segmentation system to conclude that the Google+ audience is expanding.</p>
<blockquote><em>… in just over six weeks, we&#8217;ve moved from innovators to early adopters to early mainstream users visiting the new social network.</em></blockquote>
<p>An accompanying chart shows that Google+ was initially a big hit with the &#8220;colleges and cafes&#8221; crowd (described as &#8220;young singles and recent college graduates living in college communities&#8221;), but that community is visiting Google+ less over the past month. (see red line below)</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-89322" src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/08/google-plus-hitwise.gif" alt="google-plus-hitwise" width="600" height="350" /></p>
<p>Meanwhile, the &#8220;Status Seeking Singles&#8221; segment adopted Google+ early (green line above) and continues to make up a large part of the userbase now, along with a group that Experian Hitwise calls &#8220;Kids and Cabernet.&#8221; The latter segment is described as &#8220;prosperous, middle-aged married couples living child-focused lives in affluent suburbs.&#8221; (dark blue line above)</p>
<p>Experian suggests that this &#8220;Kids and Cabernet&#8221; group is the first sign of Google+ adoption beyond innovators and early adopters and that watching the future migration of other lifestyle segments will help indicate if Google+ will become a legitimate Facebook competitor.</p>
<p>And what remains to be seen in the immediate future is if this week&#8217;s launch of <a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-plus-adds-games-89174">games on Google+</a> has any impact on the types of people that visit the site consistently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/google-plus-lifestyle-segment-adoption-89321/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Gains In Latest Hitwise Market Share Report; Google, Bing Down</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-gains-in-latest-hitwise-market-share-report-google-bing-down-89190</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-gains-in-latest-hitwise-market-share-report-google-bing-down-89190#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Popularity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=89190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and Bing both saw slight declines in search market share last month, while Yahoo gained a bit to rise back above 15%. That&#8217;s according to the Experian Hitwise report for July, 2011. These numbers are somewhat similar to what comScore shared yesterday, with Yahoo also on the rise last month.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google and Bing both saw slight declines in search market share last month, while Yahoo gained a bit to rise back above 15%. That&#8217;s according to the <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/us/press-center/press-releases/experian-hitwise-reports-google-share-of-searche/">Experian Hitwise report</a> for July, 2011.</p>
<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/08/hitwise-july2011.gif" alt="" title="hitwise-july2011" width="519" height="172" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-89191" /></p>
<p>These numbers are somewhat similar to <a href="http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-up-google-down-bing-flat-comscore-89021">what comScore shared yesterday</a>, with Yahoo also on the rise last month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-gains-in-latest-hitwise-market-share-report-google-bing-down-89190/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MapQuest Launches Local Business Listings Center</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/mapquest-launches-local-business-listings-center-82919</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/mapquest-launches-local-business-listings-center-82919#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AOL: MapQuest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines: Maps & Local Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing: Local Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO: Local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=82919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local SEOs have another tool to add to the &#8220;citation belt,&#8221; as it were: MapQuest has announced its own Local Business Center, a place where local businesses can add and/or manage their listing(s) on MapQuest. As the video below shows, the MapQuest LBC functions very much like Google&#8217;s and Bing&#8217;s and offers many of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/06/mapquest-local-business-logo.png" alt="mapquest-local-business-logo" width="222" height="69" class="alignright" />Local SEOs have another tool to add to the &#8220;citation belt,&#8221; as it were: MapQuest has <a href="http://blog.mapquest.com/2011/06/23/business-listings-add-your-business-to-mapquest-today/">announced</a> its own <a href="http://listings.mapquest.com/">Local Business Center</a>, a place where local businesses can add and/or manage their listing(s) on MapQuest.</p>
<p>As the video below shows, the MapQuest LBC functions very much like Google&#8217;s and Bing&#8217;s and offers many of the same basic features such as photo uploads, videos, categories and so forth. MapQuest is also offering two premium listing levels at $99 and $399 per year &#8212; the latter of which includes distribution of business information to other sites like Yelp, Yahoo Local, SuperPages and others. </p>
<p>The MapQuest Local Business Center is currently available to US businesses only. Here&#8217;s the MapQuest intro video that shows how it works:</p>
<p><object width="560" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PJzSFCvlmbU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PJzSFCvlmbU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="349" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>It&#8217;s been more than two years since <a href="http://searchengineland.com/comscore-to-report-google-maps-now-number-1-16570">Google Maps surpassed MapQuest</a> as the number one mapping destination in the US, but MapQuest remains a healthy number two in the latest <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/us/datacenter/main/dashboard-10133.html">Hitwise travel category</a> market share chart:</p>
<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/06/hitwise-travel-sites.gif" alt="hitwise-travel-sites" width="385" height="332" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-82920" /></p>
<p>Aside from that, MapQuest is also a frequent source of local citations inside Google Maps, so I&#8217;d expect local search marketers to welcome the addition of this new MapQuest LBC tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/mapquest-launches-local-business-listings-center-82919/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing &amp; Yahoo Pass 30% Search Engine Market Share, Hitwise Says</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/bing-yahoo-pass-30-search-engine-market-share-hitwise-says-72565</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/bing-yahoo-pass-30-search-engine-market-share-hitwise-says-72565#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Popularity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=72565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A strong month of March has propelled Bing-powered search past the 30% market share level for the first time since Bing began providing Yahoo with organic search results last August. According to the latest Experian Hitwise data, Bing and Yahoo both grew more than 5% in March and now combine for 30.01% market share. Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A strong month of March has propelled Bing-powered search past the 30% market share level for the first time since <a href="http://searchengineland.com/yahoos-transition-to-bing-organic-results-complete-49228">Bing began providing Yahoo</a> with organic search results last August.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/us/press-center/press-releases/experian-hitwise-reports-bing-powered-share-of-s/">latest Experian Hitwise data</a>, Bing and Yahoo both grew more than 5% in March and now combine for 30.01% market share.</p>
<p><img src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/04/Apr2011_Search.jpg" alt="Apr2011_Search" width="534" height="177" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-72566" /></p>
<p>Google continues to have more than twice their combined market share, but dropped a couple percentage points in March to 64.42%, Hitwise says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/bing-yahoo-pass-30-search-engine-market-share-hitwise-says-72565/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compete Confirms Bing Gains</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/compete-confirms-bing-gains-68468</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/compete-confirms-bing-gains-68468#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Sterling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats: Compete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=68468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week both comScore and Hitwise showed gains for Bing. Meanwhile Google was off 2% according to both metrics firms. Today Compete released data that confirm the direction of the earlier figures: Bing up, Google off slightly: According to Compete, both Google and Yahoo very modestly lost share, AOL and Ask were flat while Bing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week both comScore and Hitwise <a href="http://searchengineland.com/hitwise-comscore-show-new-highs-for-bing-67792">showed</a> gains for Bing. Meanwhile Google was off 2% according to both metrics firms. Today Compete released <a href="http://blog.compete.com/2011/03/16/february-2011-search-market-share-report/">data</a> that confirm the direction of the earlier figures: Bing up, Google off slightly:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-68472" title="Screen shot 2011-03-16 at 10.14.27 AM" src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/03/Screen-shot-2011-03-16-at-10.14.27-AM1-500x156.png" alt="" width="500" height="156" /></p>
<p>According to Compete, both Google and Yahoo very modestly lost share, AOL and Ask were flat while Bing gained:</p>
<ul>
<li>All engines except Bing experienced a decline in unique visitors in February, with Bing seeing a 7.6% increase in UVs MOM</li>
<li>Bing Powered engines (Yahoo! and Bing) continued to increase its share of market to 30.8%</li>
</ul>
<p>Bing continues to show incremental traction.</p>
<p>The big difference between the Hitwise, comScore and Compete data is that Compete shows Bing now ahead of Yahoo, while comScore and Hitwise show Yahoo leading Bing. Hitwise, however, shows Bing and Yahoo much closer together than comScore, which still has Yahoo ahead by a little under three points.</p>
<p>All the usual caveats apply to taking one month&#8217;s data and inferring or extrapolating too much from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/compete-confirms-bing-gains-68468/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube, MSNBC Benefit From Quake-related Search Spikes, Hitwise Says</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/youtube-msnbc-benefit-from-quake-related-search-spikes-hitwise-says-68194</link>
		<comments>http://searchengineland.com/youtube-msnbc-benefit-from-quake-related-search-spikes-hitwise-says-68194#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt McGee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search & Society: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats: Search Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=68194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search activity spiked late last week in response to the earthquake and tsunami in Japan and the two sites benefitting the most in terms of web traffic were MSNBC and YouTube. That&#8217;s according to a series of tweets from Experian Hitwise this afternoon. As the image above shows, Hitwise says that the phrase &#8220;japan earthquake&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-68195" src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/03/hitwise-tweet.png" alt="hitwise-tweet" width="542" height="215" /></p>
<p>Search activity spiked late last week in response to the earthquake and tsunami in Japan and the two sites benefitting the most in terms of web traffic were MSNBC and YouTube. That&#8217;s according to a <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/Hitwise_US/">series of tweets</a> from Experian Hitwise this afternoon.</p>
<p>As the image above shows, Hitwise says that the phrase &#8220;japan earthquake&#8221; had more search activity than always-popular one-word brand terms like &#8220;google&#8221; and &#8220;mapquest.&#8221; In a <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/Hitwise_US/status/47381289485086721">separate tweet</a>, Hitwise shared a chart showing that five of the top 20 search terms on March 11 were related to the Japanese earthquake and tsunami.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-68196" src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/03/hitwise-top20.gif" alt="hitwise-top20" width="550" height="533" /></p>
<p>Where&#8217;d all this search activity lead? Hitwise <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/Hitwise_US/status/47382041934839808">says</a>:</p>
<blockquote>MSNBC.com received the most traffic, 13.66%, from the search term &#8220;japan earthquake&#8221; on Mar 11th. YouTube ranked 2nd w/9.17%.</blockquote>
<p>And a day later, <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/Hitwise_US/status/47383264448618496">Hitwise says</a> those two sites were still getting the most traffic from that term, though they switched placed.</p>
<blockquote>On Mar 12th, YouTube received the most traffic, 12.17%, from search term &#8220;japan earthquake&#8221; &amp; MSNBC was 2nd w/11.12%.</blockquote>
<p>In addition, Hitwise tweeted out a couple other stats about Japan-related search activity:</p>
<ul>
<li>The five fastest-moving search terms last week in the US were <a href="http://ow.ly/i/99zT/original">all Japan-related</a>.</li>
<li>The top 15 &#8212; and 29 of the top 30 &#8212; fastest moving search terms that sent traffic to YouTube were <a href="http://ow.ly/i/99zD/original">related to Japan</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Twitter Activity &amp; The Japan Earthquake</h2>
<p>In its <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2011/03/numbers.html">blog post</a> today about activity levels, Twitter didn&#8217;t specifically call out the situation in Japan but, as <a href="http://searchengineland.com/twitter-says-activity-levels-are-soaring-68185">I noted in our article</a>, tweet activity was way up on March 11th (the day of the earthquake and tsunami), and new Twitter signups were up substantially on March 12th.</p>
<p>But Topsy&#8217;s new <a href="http://searchengineland.com/topsy-social-analytics-twitter-analytics-for-masses-62868">Social Analytics tool</a> provides a snapshot of tweet activity, as <a href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/03/14/twitter-once-again-proves-its-worth-in-japan-earthquake-aftermath/">Royal Pingdom pointed out</a> today. Here&#8217;s what Topsy shows for activity related to three terms: <a href="http://analytics.topsy.com/?q=japan%2Cearthquake%2Ctsunami">japan, earthquake and tsunami</a>:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-68197" src="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2011/03/topsy-twitter.gif" alt="topsy-twitter" width="550" height="283" /></p>
<p>The Topsy stats for those terms also reveals some of the most popular links and tweets related to the Japanese disaster. At the moment, that top content includes appeals to donate to the Red Cross, photos and videos from several news sources, and even <a href="http://searchengineland.com/bing-apologizes-for-japan-quake-tweet-67987">Bing&#8217;s unfortunate tweet</a> that some took as an effort to gain exposure in exchange for donations.</p>
<p><strong>Postscript:</strong> What about Facebook, you ask? Well, there are no exact numbers in this, but All Facebook <a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/maps-show-japan-postings-spread-on-facebook-2011-03">points out</a> a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=290029&amp;id=250083749935&amp;fbid=10150119188069936">series of world maps</a> that Facebook has posted, which show the spread of Japan-related status updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchengineland.com/youtube-msnbc-benefit-from-quake-related-search-spikes-hitwise-says-68194/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.298 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 01:37:47 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
