• http://www.SmartInternetBusinessSolutions.co.uk/ Tarjinder S. Kailey

    When Matt Cutts said “We’re trying to stop spam so people can compete on a level
    playing field” I am pretty sure that lots of people (especially those who
    thought that Penguin is an anti-small business) can breathe easier now.

  • http://twitter.com/RavirajTak Raviraj Tak

    I have a question when the penguin update was launched and many of the sites were badly affected from it and lots of sites using spam techniques were in top searches; even sites which were stuffing keywords in their title’s were also seen in top searches. Was this a good penguin update. If this is what the penguin wants to do is than i guess there would be a lot of spamming coming in the near future.

  • http://twitter.com/yesceeohhh sithurajkumar

    “You don’t look at how quickly someone bounces from a search result and back to Google? .. That’s a good question by danny. Search engine results should satisfy the searchers not the SEO’s…

  • dnyaneshwar ware

    After penguin update it is true that many of the websites ranking in the search result had keyword stuffing in their titles but if you observe carefully the link profile of each of these websites ranking in the search result then you may come up with a conclusion that these websites did not have backlinks with an exact match anchor text in their titles, keyword and nor description.
    So these websites got advantage of doubt from penguin update.
    One such good example is About.com which has very beautifully created their backlinks. These is one of the biggest website with multiple sub domains and they created backlinks with anchor text as  “about.com resume samples” and a number of variation in anchor text alongwith domain name. They are ranking well in SERP’s.

    So we should focus on building a good link profile and make sure that majority of the backlinks are not coming from one specific keyword.

    Right now. Guest posting is the only solution for building quality links with branding URL.
    Need to work on balancing your link profile graph.

  • Alan

    You are either joking (which I hope you are) or you are truly misguided!

  • https://plus.google.com/u/0/111506395990228434496/about Stacey Cavanagh

    Interesting point on potentially allowing Webmasters to disavow certain links. Does that mean that Google would potentially make ALL link data available to use in Webmaster Tools, I wonder? As, at present, there’s only a select amount in there.

  • http://localseoireland.ie/ Sean Fullerton

    Some very interesting points…surprised to hear him say Google does not use Analytics for their rankings, I was sure I’d seen a lot of growing signals to that effect recently. 

    Thanks for the updates Matt you kept up to speed very well! 

  • Blue-eyed Gal

    Pointless pedantry: Dear Matt; just use corpuses, like campuses; it’s okay to anglicize Latin words. Despite the ending, corpus is a third declension neuter noun, so the original Latin plural is corpora not corpi, which sounds like a cross between a porpoise and one of QE2’s corgis.

  • http://www.antonkoekemoer.com/ Anton Koekemoer

    I almost fell off of my chair watching that video. 

  • http://winkpress.com/ MK Safi

    Link disavow tool? What’s this BS coming to? Will Google please get some new creative blood to run their antispam dept?

  • http://twitter.com/benlanders benlanders

    Love this one, “why not just be sincere and awesome?” Great question! Want big muscles? Why not just workout hard and eat right? Want to win the Tour de France? Why take EPO? Why not just ride 100 miles per day, every day for 10 years? Answer: Because it’s hard!!!

    Most people are averse to hard work (which is unfortunate for them, but a blessing for any company committed to “doing it right”).

  • Peter Kern

    Of course penguin is to remove web spam sites that’s why aged decent websites/businesses had been removed from the top results. Instead there are ‘better’ results from amazon, qype, etc and… new fresh rubbish websites with duplicate content. WELL DONE!

  • Peter Kern

    … and you believe in anything they tell you?

  • Peter Kern

    So… if your website suffered because of the penguin you have to build a new one. Forget about building your website for years. It is all gone. I don’t believe in recovery if you change few things. What can you change if your website complied with google guidelines?

  • robthespy

    The anti-spam department is every division in Google which makes $$$.

    It’s a heck of a lot easier, cheaper and more profitable to simply remove/limit organic listings for competitive and commercial SERPs.

    As always, the user will dictate the success of Google. In the meantime, Google will make it as difficult as possible to avoid them.

  • robthespy

    It’s not just about working hard. Im guessing that many site owners hit by Penguin, panda, Skunk, [insert black and white animal], had no idea that what they were doing was not good practice. And many of them worked very hard and spent a lot of money.

    Yes, ignorance is not an excuse. But IMO- you can’t call those hit by updates “lazy” or accuse them of taking the easy road.

  • robthespy

    It’s not just about working hard. Im guessing that many site owners hit by Penguin, panda, Skunk, [insert black and white animal], had no idea that what they were doing was not good practice. And many of them worked very hard and spent a lot of money.

    Yes, ignorance is not an excuse. But IMO- you can’t call those hit by updates “lazy” or accuse them of taking the easy road.

  • http://www.brickmarketing.com/ Nick Stamoulis

    “that Google is considering offering a tool that allows web masters to disavow certain links”

    That would make a lot of site owners breath a lot easy and put any fears of negative SEO to rest. It would be incredibly useful for SEO providers that take on new clients because we could go in and undo any black hat work down by previous firms and get a fresh start.

  • Bhupendra Shekhawat

    “Google does not use Analytics for their rankings”…what they will be use…..????

  • RyanMJones

    I wish Matt would have clarified more on negative SEO. I’m pretty sure his definition differs from that of the audience.  He mentioned the disavow tool because people are requesting it, but he seemed to hint that it’s not needed.

    I understand the legal reasons why he can’t say if negative SEO is possible just by building bad links, but if it’s not – or not very likely, I wish he’d come out and say that to put people at ease.  

    The general consensus seems to be that its’ very easy to do and very possible, and after trying to get one of my sites penalized I can say it’s not that easy.  Simple xrumer and scrapebox blasts aren’t enough to do it. All I’ve managed to do so far with those is increase my rankings.

  • http://moficast.com/ jemois

    I really think Google is doing a good thing in creating a tool to disavow certain links. I think the main idea is that you can’t hurt your competitors by adding spammy links to their website but also to get rid of the unwanted links to your domain. 

  • Johndx

     Looking forward to running through a list of 5,000 links to disavow them one by one? The easy thing is to not allow link penalties at all.

  • Peter Kern

    Of course negative SEO is possible. If the websites were penalised for over optimisation than do it for your competitors. Simple as that. How would Google know who is doing it?

  • Johndx

    Wait and see what happens.

    Let’s put it simply: it’s very, very easy.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/4STZ44DMKRKDLH7IZTRDB2B4J4 Phil

    Has anyone tried the new Remove’em tool that just came out as a way to identify and remove bad backlinks?

  • http://www.facebook.com/tienvnguyen Tien V Nguyen

    I wasn’t entirely clear on that part, it seemed like it was more of a “submit URLs that you don’t want to be associated with”, rather than “here’s a list and check the ones you don’t want to be associated with”. 

    Of course that opens the possibility of abuse up where Google catches you with a bad link, so you just say “oh that’s not actually mine”.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=535260227 Jeff Kean

    Way to completely ignore the tough question instead of asking matt when you had the chance, another top showing from Danny Sullivan

  • Matt McGee

    Hi Stacey – they would really only need to show the links that they consider suspicious to do this, not every link pointing to a site/page.

  • http://twitter.com/briancarter Brian Carter

    Sometimes I open 5 of the top 10 results so I can read them all. Would that be considered bouncing back to Google? I am interested in them all.

  • http://www.webstatsart.com/ Webstats Art

    Google are to blame for this. They admit that they let them (black hat) get way with cheating in the past. Billions of dollars have been lost by good companies over the years because Google search was so easily exploited and companies who made the best products and had great people died because of the SERPS. How can you blame people who started out well but ended up buying links? Those same people saw competitors getting ahead through SEO and they had no choice.
    What is very wrong with google is that they started bringing  all these updates all at once in early 2011 when they should of done it gradually.

    Of course it is easy for google employees to smile because they have such power that they can influence a company’s future by dropping their web presence overnight. Those companies will be happy when a technology comes to knock google on the head.. and maybe, just like Panda – it will happen overnight.

    Do you all remember when we were all upset with Microsoft? At that time, we never imagined that someone else could challenge them. It is the same with Google. Something can change and the internet is evolving too fast for anyone to prepare for what is coming next.

  • Casey Dennison

     Exactly…anchor text is the signal their using and there were tons of sites that slipped through the filter. People don’t get get.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jwhere John Kent Williams

    Back-Links have become non-sense and abused and misused …and just non-sense.  Just take the silly use of backlinks out of the algo…done…no more contraversy, no more bad SEO etc.  What happended to content being KING. Don’t user want to use and see content ?

  • http://moficast.com/ jemois

    Google didn’t build the tool yet, they will develop it in the next months

  • http://moficast.com/ jemois

    They want to stop the link building madness. From all the links you get maybe some of them are good and you want to keep them, so even if there are 5000 is better so look through them and keep only the ones that count. Its better then being penalized anyway :)) I think its pretty easy to “see” the spammy ones.

  • http://twitter.com/DavidJo45324615 David Johnstone

    For an SMB and their target market, it’s not about creating an awesome brochure (website), it’s about providing an awesome product or service. However, Google’s algo is not clever enough to judge the quality of a product or service.  And so this meaningless quest for “being awesome because Google tells me to” is referring to CONTENT only.  It’s like saying a company is awesome because their brochure is awesome.  NO.  A company is awesome because their product or service is awesome.  End of story.  In e-commerce, a searcher wants to find an awesome product or service – the brochure (the website) is just the shop front – nothing more.  It’s because of Google’s weakness for ranking content based on content-winning-links that we’re all playing this charade of trying to create the best brochure (that searcher’s largely do not care about – they care about your service or product).

  • http://twitter.com/DavidJo45324615 David Johnstone

    Exactly – I know a lot of small businesses that got hit hard (by Penguin) and they provide a quality product / service.  They can’t just start over – their print materials have their URL, their whole legacy of doing business was married to the URL that’s now punished.  So Matt Cutts says “start over” – it’s like telling a bricks and mortar shop to move location and rebrand itself just because a 3rd party company made a decision against it.  Even worse, Matt Cutts admits that we can’t even fully protect ourselves from negative SEO, so why even bother to start again, just to be knocked down by a competitor? Crazy situation that is stifling SMBs at a time we least need it.

  • http://searchengineland.com/ Danny Sullivan

    The tough question on negative SEO? Or paid inclusion? Or if they’re losing the war against paid links? Or would he put himself in a publisher’s shoes for a month and try building links that are supposedly so easy to get? Oh, wait, I did ask those and more.

  • http://searchengineland.com/ Danny Sullivan

    Please rent Repo Man. Fast forward to the scene where the punk tries to rob a store, gets shot and says society is to blame. Yes, people have no choice but to buy links. People have all types of choices. Those who chose not to do it may have given up short term gains and avoided long term woes.

  • http://www.liquid-silver-marketing.co.uk/ Farky Rafiq

    Do you think that CTR has an impact on rankings as its displayed within WMT I cant help but think that if its low on the Serp its worst then a bounce because the page isn’t relevant to the query

  • Alan

    Danny you asked “DS: Did you just do another Penguin update?
    MC: No.” You should have asked is there any update being run at the moment? You would have had a very different answer I am betting. Because webmaster chatter is as high as any other time during the last 3 months.

  • http://www.consultancymarketing.co.uk/ Ian Smith

    Lots of detailed analysis going on concerning what aspects of the algorithm have changed. But one of the biggest effects does seem to be an elevation in rankings for the large national and global companies. Small businesses definitely seem to be getting hit most.

  • http://searchengineland.com/ Danny Sullivan

    We actually already asked Google earlier that day if they’d done a Penguin Update, a Panda Update or any other type of major update and were told no. That’s why we didn’t write a story confirming any of that. Asking him about the Penguin Update was really a joke, because we’d just asked and see to be asking every few days now.

  • Alan

    Don’t joke about the penguin!! Just joking! However I still believe something is happening out there and that Matt is not telling the full story. Then again it is his job to not tell the full story. Although another possibility is that he may not know the full story. One thing I have realized in the last few months of watching Google closer than normal is that Google’s disparate sections are not always completely aware of each others activities. In the immortal words of GW “We now know what the left hand, is doing with the right hand” when he obviously didn’t know. 

  • http://twitter.com/dnyaneshwarware dnyaneshwar ware

    Well, Matt Cutts is very clever and knows that the penguin update has given room for negative SEO and to tackle that very same problem, they went on to develop a tool called A Disavow-This-Link Tool. 
    Matt Cutts will not reveal the full story at this time but picture will become more clear in the coming months.
    I am sure this algorithm has affected many websites which have spammy link profile, which means that any website that has too many backlinks coming from handful of targeted keywords and is surely going to get hit by this algorithm. 
    This algorithm has given more importance to brand name of the website.
    As such links with direct brand URLs(staring with http and www) and brand name(Domain Name) will be of much importance. 
    And Finally the keywords in the title, description and keyword density of the page will play a major role for ranking high in the SERPs.

    I hope all of you are getting my point.

  • jasjotbains

    I dont see Penguin (or Panda for that matter) stop spam. They just messed up rankings of sites with bad links, and help sites with good links and crappy content come on top

  • http://twitter.com/DiviFernando Divi Fernando

    My question is – Why did Matt Cutts bring stuffed Penguins to the Conference?

    They are not a comforting soft toy to hold anymore :P

    Good to see Matt Cutts finally confronting questions about the Penguin update after a long haul of mysterious silence on the topic. Although not much is revealed, there have been certain useful disclosures thanks to the frank nature of Danny’s questions.

  • JassyPets21

    MC admitted it’s possible to perform neg seo, which is why google changed it’s language about the subject. “Our guidelines used to say it’s nearly impossible to do that, but there have been cases where that’s happened, so we changed the wording on that part of our guidelines.”

    If they thought it was still “nearly impossible”, then they wouldn’t have changed the language.

  • JassyPets21

    I think a tool that allows site owners to disavow links is an AWFUL idea. Small business owners work hard. Now you want them to comb through WMT and GUESS at which links MIGHT be providing negative value, and disavow them? We know that WMT does not display all links anyway. What do you do about those? How do you find them? How do you take them down? How do you disavow them?

    The solution is VERY easy. Do not pass negative value from links. And do not penalize for over optimization of anchor text. This solves negative seo.

  • http://www.webstatsart.com/ Webstats Art

    Hi Danny,

    Short term gains can be millions upon millions for a business. All those link buyers wanted was a window to become popular through exploiting Google. Once they reached a certain point, they did not need google anymore because they made a brand by exploiting google. People have stolen technology, made products and sold through the internet. When they made their millions, they all of a sudden become legit. Of course they have money to pay the best people to provide their panda/penguin resilient content.

    This is a repeat story of the history modern gangs and of course the mafia.

  • http://twitter.com/wouterkiel Wouter Kiel

    “DS: […] You don’t look at how quickly someone bounces from a search result and back to Google?MC: […] No, Google does not use analytics in its rankings.”
    That’s a clever answer. MC says nothing about using G-bounce or whatever, which  surely must be a ranking signal.They’re already using it to enable domain blocking in the serps.