Sep 13, 2007 at 11:45am ET by Chris Silver Smith
Many companies have brick-and-mortar locations spread out across the country or around the world, and most have some type of store locator utility on their websites. Restaurant chains, hotels, retailers, service providers, and more will frequently have a substantial web presence coupled with the desire to make it easy for consumers to find their local outlets. But most of these companies haven’t thought their store locator strategies through very well, treating the site feature as just a necessary item to include like a “contact us” page, or copyright notice—and they haven’t really thought through optimizing that content to easily be found through search engines.
This article is part of Local Search Week here at Search Engine Land, a special look at local search marketing issues in the run-up to our SMX Local & Mobile conference next month.
In this article I’ll outline a few reasons why optimized store locators are beneficial, and I’ll provide a few tips on how to optimize the content for local searches and better user-experience overall.
Let’s look at an example of a typical major corporate store locator.
Starbucks, the company that elevated coffee to a religion and enjoys daily visits from devoted worshipers at thousands of locations, has a web site store locator on the link labeled “find a store.” The search form on that page allows one to enter a street address to find all Starbucks outlets within a certain radius of the address. If you don’t enter a street address, and only enter a zip code or only a city + state, the utility will find all outlets within radius of the centroid of the zip code or city area.
Notice that the Starbucks store locator doesn’t have alternate navigation for users (or bots) to find their outlets’ info pages—everything must go through the search form. So, their store locations pages are not getting spidered and indexed by the search engines.
Does this cause Starbucks problems? Probably not any major problems, but this situation results in other sites being able to achieve placement in the search results for their own brand name terms. For instance, performing a search in Google for “Denver Starbucks” returns a number of directories or other sites first in the search results prior to the Google Maps links:
The first link is for the StarbucksEveryWhere.net site—a site operated by a fan of Starbucks which displays photos of lots of Starbucks locations found in a number of major cities. It’s probably unsatisfactory for users seeking coffee shops in their area, though, because it doesn’t show the street addresses or contact info of each of the locations.
The next two pages in the Google SERP are for online directories—ZipHip.com, and Citysearch. These are great since they have addresses, maps and phone numbers for the locations. But these sites are likely not getting their data from Starbucks—ZipHip is getting its data from Local.com which is getting data from Acxiom and other sources, and Citysearch is getting data from infoUSA. While the data aggregators like Acxiom and infoUSA are great, it’s quite possible that the data isn’t up to date, so some of the Starbucks they list could be closed, and they might not have the listings for the newest stores.
While the Google Maps listings do show mapped locations, phone numbers, and links over to Starbucks.com, the very links themselves are not all that ideal because they just dump the users who might click through onto the Starbucks homepage.
Under the Google Maps listings, a page from Metblogs shows up titled “Starbucks, WTF?”—a page that touts a competitor and give passing criticism to Starbucks.
Starbucks might wish to reduce the chances that users go through the “middleman” sites for a few reasons. The info could be stale, users could be leaving negative reviews for locations, and Starbucks could be paying for referrals from some of those sites. Starbucks may want to advertise other stuff to those users who come onto their sites looking for locations. It’s a better user experience for searchers to be able to easily find the official info from Starbucks, and Starbucks can better manage its online reputation by enabling people to find stores directly.
Not to mention, if Starbucks had optimized a page for Denver, they’d likely rank higher than the other sites showing up, and this could help push that negative page on Metroblog down further, reducing the chances that users would pay attention to it.
The Starbucks nonoptimal store locator situation isn’t unique. Try “Houston Pizza Hut”, or “Chicago Zales Jewelry“, or “Nashville Meineke.” For that matter, find “Wal-Mart in Seattle.”
The search engines, particularly Google, will show preferential rankings to famous name-brand sites for specific searches like this, if they can find relevant content. If these sites were to perform just a little basic SEO with these sections, they could improve their local search rankings and improve their site traffic and user-experience.
Unsurprisingly, one vertical industry which does do locator pages well is the hotels industry, perhaps because their locations are their primary product, and they’re highly conscious about how much research happens online when consumers select accommodations. For instance, take a look at Marriott.com’s “Find & Reserve” page which includes regular links to their hotel’s individual profile pages. They link through to individual hotel pages by cities, states, amenities, airports, local activities and more. So, if a user performs a search like “Minneapolis Marriott” or “Marriott in Los Angeles“, one of Marriott’s own site pages is coming up as highest for the search.
Marriott’s search-engine-friendly design should really be sort of thing that all chain stores aim to achieve. Here are some tips on the best practices for optimizing store locator web content.
Tips to optimize store locators for local search:
Most large corporate chains have both the data and the development resources necessary to optimize their store location pages, but they lack the focus to see that they could benefit from doing this. The search engine’s continual improvements have also contributed to giving these companies a lack of urgency in optimizing their locators. Yet, optimizing these sections is worthwhile. Having the official location pages exposed through the search engines will bring in more traffic, allowing these companies to market new products to their customers. It’ll also reduce the instances where they’re paying third parties for referral traffic that could be going to them directly, and it will help them control their online reputations better.
Chris “Silver” Smith is Lead Strategist at Netconcepts.
|
Attend SMX Local &
Mobile! |
Produced by the Search Engine Land editorial team, Search Marketing Expo (SMX) Local & Mobile covers the latest tips and techniques for local search. It’s the only event 100 percent focused on the significant opportunity that the local and mobile space offers to search marketers. Hear the podcast about the show. See the Agenda. Check out the Networking page. Register today! |
Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.
Share, Bookmark & Discuss This Article
More:
Keep Updated: News Via Email | News Via RSS Feed | News Via Twitter
See more stories like this in the Members Library! Check out the Local Search Week, SEO: Local sections of the Members Library where this story is filed. Members also get access to exclusive video content, a members-only weekly & monthly newsletter, plus more. Check out all the benefits!
TOP STORIES
SEARCH NEWS BRIEFS
FEATURES & ANALYSIS
RECENT COMMNENTS
Stay on top of all the search news with our daily summary, the SearchCap newsletter. View a sample ›
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
SMX Web Site » | SMX Difference » | SMX News »
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Featured sites from our Blogroll
Become a premium member today and receive:
Thank you Chris for the great insight and useful information regarding retail SEO for online stores having multiple physical locations. The biggest challenge for my company managing SEO for similar clients has been the open-ended waiting period we’ve experienced each time we update a Google local listing.
But what the heck — I can hear my father’s words ringing loud and clear, “believe me son — there’s no such thing as a free lunch”.
Thanks again,
Rick
I sympathise with this problem greatly - we recently had to come up with a solution for a company whose store locator for its 75 outlets in the UK wasn’t even on the same domain as the top-level site pages, nor were the individual products pages. Serious leakage of external links, with very few internal ones, being another big issue.
Horrendous wait for Google Local listings, but one thing our client had to do was to start getting this sorted out.