Major Entertainment Groups Accuse Google, Bing Of Directing Users To Illegal Content

piracy-cdsSeveral major UK entertainment industry groups are accusing Google and Bing of directing searchers to illegal content, and have proposed a “Code of Practice” for how search engines can better encourage consumers to locate legal content on the web. The groups are also calling for the UK government to help oversee how well the search engines administer the recommendations listed in the Code of Practice.

As The Guardian reports, the groups involved in the proposal include the British Phonographic Industry (BPI), the Motion Picture Association (MPA), the Premier League, the Publishers Association and a TV/film trade group called the Pact. The groups’ suggestions are spelled out in a nine-page document that became public after a Freedom of Information Act request.

The Piracy Problem

The entertainment groups say it is “trivially easy for UK consumers to find and access illegal entertainment content via search engines.”

On September 26 2011, BPI made test searches on Google for the name of each of the UK’s top 20 singles and albums, followed in each case by the word “mp3″ (the dominant legal and illegal file format for digital music). On average, 16 of the first 20 Google results for charts singles and 15 of the top 20 search results for chart albums linked to known illegal sites.

The report also cites a Publishers Association study that involved searches on both Google and Bing for the 50 bestselling books during the last week of April 2011. In that study, “Google returned an average of 41% non-legal links in the top ten (first page) results” and “Bing returned an average of 21% non-legal links in the top ten (first page) results.”

Search Engines Code of Practice

The report suggests a Code of Practice for search engines that includes the following:

  • assign lower rankings to sites that “repeatedly make available unlicensed content in breach of copyright”
  • prioritize (i.e., give better rankings/visibility to) websites that “obtain certification as a licensed site” for content downloading
  • stop indexing websites that are subject to court orders and create “procedures to de-index substantially infringing websites”
  • improve the “notice and takedown” system and ensure that searchers aren’t sent to illegal sites via suggested searches, related searches and suggested sites
  • ensure that search engines don’t advertise illegal sites, place advertising on them, or profit from selling keywords related to illegal sites
  • ensure that they don’t profit from selling mobile apps that “encourage infringement”

Google declined to comment to the Guardian.

The company faced similar pressure in December when the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) scolded Google and suggested that the company’s search algorithm be changed to better fight online piracy. Even Congress has discussed whether Google should favor legal sites in its search results.

Google did extend an olive branch of sorts in the U.S. when it launched the Google Music store in November. Earlier last year, Google also began removing some piracy-related terms from its Instant Search product.

Related Topics: Channel: Industry | Google: Critics | Google: Legal | Legal: Copyright | Microsoft: Bing | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is Editor-In-Chief of Search Engine Land. His news career includes time spent in TV, radio, and print journalism. His web career continues to include a small number of SEO and social media consulting clients, as well as regular speaking engagements at marketing events around the U.S. He recently launched a site dedicated to Google Glass called Glass Almanac and also blogs at Small Business Search Marketing. Matt can be found on Twitter at @MattMcGee and/or on Google Plus. You can read Matt's disclosures on his personal blog.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.nathanielbailey.co.uk Nathaniel Bailey

    So how would we go about getting a “obtain certification as a licensed site”? I do some work on a friends site which is for legal mp3 music, so I take it if google go for this it would help his rankings to get one of those “obtain certification as a licensed site”?

  • Chris L. Melfi

    Maybe if the “Big Names” in entertainment would hire some SEO’s to fix their sites and work on their inbound game instead of crying about it they would show in the SERP’s. Spend money on the sites’ instead of hiring bounty hunters and sending them oversea’s… foolish.
    STOP SOPA / PIPA.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide