<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft &amp; Yahoo Said To Be Talking Merger, Cooperation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/microsoft-yahoo-said-to-be-talking-merger-cooperation-11139/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/microsoft-yahoo-said-to-be-talking-merger-cooperation-11139</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:49:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gary price</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/microsoft-yahoo-said-to-be-talking-merger-cooperation-11139/comment-page-1#comment-2313</link>
		<dc:creator>gary price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 20:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/microsoft-yahoo-said-to-be-talking-merger-cooperation-11139.php#comment-2313</guid>
		<description>Well, it appears that once again talk about a Microsoft / Yahoo hook-up are over. &lt;a href=&quot;http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&amp;storyid=2007-05-04T203059Z_01_N04222536_RTRUKOC_0_US-YAHOO-MICROSOFT.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;citing people familiar with the situation,&quot; reports that talks between MSFT and YHOO are, &quot;no longer active.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it appears that once again talk about a Microsoft / Yahoo hook-up are over. <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&#038;storyid=2007-05-04T203059Z_01_N04222536_RTRUKOC_0_US-YAHOO-MICROSOFT.xml" rel="nofollow">Reuters</a>, &#8220;citing people familiar with the situation,&#8221; reports that talks between MSFT and YHOO are, &#8220;no longer active.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary price</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/microsoft-yahoo-said-to-be-talking-merger-cooperation-11139/comment-page-1#comment-2312</link>
		<dc:creator>gary price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 21:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/microsoft-yahoo-said-to-be-talking-merger-cooperation-11139.php#comment-2312</guid>
		<description>Danny:
What a busy week for &quot;possible&quot; acquisitions. A couple of comments.

Microsoft and Yahoo already have a &quot;small deal&quot; in place with the recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betanews.com/article/Microsoft_Yahoo_Bridge_IM_Networks/1152759304&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;linking/interoperability between&lt;/a&gt; their IM services.

At the very end of 2006, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2006/12/22/aol-yahoo-microsoft-markets-equity-cx_lh_1222markets14.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Merrill Lynch was saying&lt;/a&gt; that a possible hook-up between Yahoo and AOL was a possibility in 2007.

You posted on Tuesday about an unsolicited bid for Dow Jones by News Corp. Today, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/05/business/media/05reuters-web.html?ex=1336017600&amp;en=818d90d779986db8&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;we read&lt;/a&gt; of information powerhouse Thomson &quot;talking&quot; about a deal for Reuters. We&#039;ve known for several months that Thomson is shopping their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thomson.com/content/pr/corp/corp_news/139161&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Learning&lt;/a&gt; division that includes database/info subsidiary, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6385711.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Thomson Gale&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny:<br />
What a busy week for &#8220;possible&#8221; acquisitions. A couple of comments.</p>
<p>Microsoft and Yahoo already have a &#8220;small deal&#8221; in place with the recent <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Microsoft_Yahoo_Bridge_IM_Networks/1152759304" rel="nofollow">linking/interoperability between</a> their IM services.</p>
<p>At the very end of 2006, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/12/22/aol-yahoo-microsoft-markets-equity-cx_lh_1222markets14.html" rel="nofollow">Merrill Lynch was saying</a> that a possible hook-up between Yahoo and AOL was a possibility in 2007.</p>
<p>You posted on Tuesday about an unsolicited bid for Dow Jones by News Corp. Today, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/05/business/media/05reuters-web.html?ex=1336017600&#038;en=818d90d779986db8&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">we read</a> of information powerhouse Thomson &#8220;talking&#8221; about a deal for Reuters. We&#8217;ve known for several months that Thomson is shopping their <a href="http://www.thomson.com/content/pr/corp/corp_news/139161" rel="nofollow">Learning</a> division that includes database/info subsidiary, <a href="http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6385711.html" rel="nofollow">Thomson Gale</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ciaran</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/microsoft-yahoo-said-to-be-talking-merger-cooperation-11139/comment-page-1#comment-2311</link>
		<dc:creator>ciaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 12:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/microsoft-yahoo-said-to-be-talking-merger-cooperation-11139.php#comment-2311</guid>
		<description>I know that this sounds ridiculous, but I can actually see more benefit in a Google/Yahoo! match up than with MSN - Yahoo! strikes me as having the best of the social networks, whilst Google has stomped all over search....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that this sounds ridiculous, but I can actually see more benefit in a Google/Yahoo! match up than with MSN &#8211; Yahoo! strikes me as having the best of the social networks, whilst Google has stomped all over search&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
