Jun 1, 2008 at 12:50pm ET by Danny Sullivan
I got a chuckle out of this one. It seems that Google sent their cars that do StreetView photography for Google Maps into a private neighborhood in Minnesota. That neighborhood, North Oaks, demanded that Google remove all the images. As the roads are private, Google potentially trespassed to take the pictures. Google’s complied in this case. In a different one, the company is fighting back in court. From the Minneapolis Star-Tribune article about the case:
Google spokeswoman Elaine Filadelfo said the images of North Oaks were removed shortly afterward. She didn’t know of any other city in the country that has made a similar request.
"This is very rare where an entire town would request to be taken off," Filadelfo said.
The company receives a limited number of requests from individuals who don’t want their homes displayed on the website. All of these images are removed from public view and would never be sold, Filadelfo said.
For more, see related discussion on Techmeme.
Postscript: Google Seeks Dismissal Of Street View Lawsuit covers a different case that’s in court, where Google has now argued that it has the right to enter private property and take pictures. From the article:
"Plaintiffs have drawn the public eye upon themselves and the view of their home they claim is private," the memorandum states. "Plaintiffs did not seek to file their Complaint under seal, they unnecessarily included their street address in the Complaint, and they did not ask Google to remove the images of their property before they filed suit."
The Borings, the legal memorandum explains, "live in a residential community in the twenty-first century United States, where every step upon private property is not deemed by law to be an actionable trespass."
Because it is customary for people to "drive on our driveways and approach our homes," Google’s attorneys argue, these intrusions and customary and expected. "Thus, unless there is a clear expression such as a gate, fence, or ‘keep out’ sign," anyone can approach without liability for trespass. "Plaintiff’s allegation of a ‘private road’ sign at the top of their street standing alone is insufficient to negate Google’s privileged and trivial entry upon Plaintiff’s property."
While Google’s attorneys may be correct in their assessment of the law, their hard line on privacy contrasts with statements made by Google’s managers.
U.S. Pentagon Bans Google From Military Bases also covers how Google has found itself banned from military bases in the United States.
Share, Bookmark & Discuss This Article
More:
Keep Updated: News Via Email | News Via RSS Feed | News Via Twitter
See more stories like this in the Members Library! Check out the Google: Maps & Local, Google: Street View, Legal: Privacy sections of the Members Library where this story is filed. Members also get access to exclusive video content, a members-only weekly & monthly newsletter, plus more. Check out all the benefits!
TOP STORIES
SEARCH NEWS BRIEFS
FEATURES & ANALYSIS
RECENT COMMENTS
Stay on top of all the search news with our daily summary, the SearchCap newsletter. View a sample ›
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
SMX Web Site » | SMX Difference » | SMX News »
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Featured sites from our Blogroll
Become a premium member today and receive: