<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Pork Board Says: Breastfeeding Is A Viable Trademark Threat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DLPerry</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429/comment-page-1#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>DLPerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429.php#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Nice bit of canned-ham. :)
I got the same letter in response to my own email to the NPB.
Danny I think you are still right - they still aren&#039;t getting it - apology or not.
Oh well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice bit of canned-ham. :)<br />
I got the same letter in response to my own email to the NPB.<br />
Danny I think you are still right &#8211; they still aren&#8217;t getting it &#8211; apology or not.<br />
Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLPerry</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429/comment-page-1#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>DLPerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429.php#comment-930</guid>
		<description>Nice bit of canned-ham. :)
I got the same letter in response to my own email to the NPB.
Danny I think you are still right - they still aren&#039;t getting it - apology or not.
Oh well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice bit of canned-ham. :)<br />
I got the same letter in response to my own email to the NPB.<br />
Danny I think you are still right &#8211; they still aren&#8217;t getting it &#8211; apology or not.<br />
Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wardo</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429/comment-page-1#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Wardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429.php#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Danny, I got the same canned response to my email to the board. You gotta laugh at the phrase - &quot;We apologize if our response seemed impersonal or harsh; that was not our intent&quot;.

Reminds me of the movie &quot;You&#039;ve Got Mail&quot; when the character Kathleen (played by Meg Ryan) responds to a similar comment by Joe:
&quot;...but it&#039;s personal to me, it&#039;s personal to a lot of people...I mean, whatever else anything is, it ought to begin by being personal.&quot;

In response we are (personally) switching from ham to turkey sandwiches for Superbowl snacks tomorrow.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny, I got the same canned response to my email to the board. You gotta laugh at the phrase &#8211; &#8220;We apologize if our response seemed impersonal or harsh; that was not our intent&#8221;.</p>
<p>Reminds me of the movie &#8220;You&#8217;ve Got Mail&#8221; when the character Kathleen (played by Meg Ryan) responds to a similar comment by Joe:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;but it&#8217;s personal to me, it&#8217;s personal to a lot of people&#8230;I mean, whatever else anything is, it ought to begin by being personal.&#8221;</p>
<p>In response we are (personally) switching from ham to turkey sandwiches for Superbowl snacks tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Clark</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429/comment-page-1#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/national-pork-board-says-breastfeeding-is-a-viable-trademark-threat-10429.php#comment-928</guid>
		<description>The use of a trademarked phrase to amuse, and not to confuse, is a protected fair use, as a parody. This is pretty standard trademark law.

Ok, so perhaps Mr. Murphy should look at all the harmless fun that&#039;s been had with the &quot;Got Root?&quot; shirts:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/sysadmin/280d/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/sysadmin/280d/&lt;/a&gt;

The US Milk Advisory Board seems to be allowing the shirt to be marketed, but if I remember correctly, however, they sued Gateway Computer over the &quot;Got Computer?&quot; slogan used in an ad campaign.






</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of a trademarked phrase to amuse, and not to confuse, is a protected fair use, as a parody. This is pretty standard trademark law.</p>
<p>Ok, so perhaps Mr. Murphy should look at all the harmless fun that&#8217;s been had with the &#8220;Got Root?&#8221; shirts:  <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/sysadmin/280d/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/sysadmin/280d/</a></p>
<p>The US Milk Advisory Board seems to be allowing the shirt to be marketed, but if I remember correctly, however, they sued Gateway Computer over the &#8220;Got Computer?&#8221; slogan used in an ad campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
