<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Debate On Search Engine Regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/new-debate-on-search-engine-regulation-11929/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/new-debate-on-search-engine-regulation-11929</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/new-debate-on-search-engine-regulation-11929/comment-page-1#comment-3576</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/new-debate-on-search-engine-regulation-11929.php#comment-3576</guid>
		<description>Thanks Matt. Why not &quot;more speech&quot;? Because this issue is not about merely speaking, but whether or not you&#039;re &lt;em&gt;heard&lt;/em&gt;.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matt. Why not &#8220;more speech&#8221;? Because this issue is not about merely speaking, but whether or not you&#8217;re <em>heard</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/new-debate-on-search-engine-regulation-11929/comment-page-1#comment-3575</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/new-debate-on-search-engine-regulation-11929.php#comment-3575</guid>
		<description>Seth, good post. I hadn&#039;t seen Lauren&#039;s post about disputing search results. I guess my main question would be why a special form instead of just the more speech that someone can do on their on website(s)?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth, good post. I hadn&#8217;t seen Lauren&#8217;s post about disputing search results. I guess my main question would be why a special form instead of just the more speech that someone can do on their on website(s)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/new-debate-on-search-engine-regulation-11929/comment-page-1#comment-3574</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/new-debate-on-search-engine-regulation-11929.php#comment-3574</guid>
		<description>I have a blog post of my own on this:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/001243.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Regulation Of Search Engines discussion - &quot;Federal Search Commission?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;But the authors&#039; specific attempts to find a hairsplit for search engines (my paraphrase here) - secret algorithms, or overblown marketing claims, or Google-is-God perceptions, or defining it as not discussion among citizens - just seem to me to be playing to the discomfort that some liberal-arts types have with anything involving technology. If computer programs are covered by copyright (something that was not so evident years ago), then search engine ranking are &quot;opinions&quot;.&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a blog post of my own on this:</p>
<p><a href="http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/001243.html" rel="nofollow"><br />
Regulation Of Search Engines discussion &#8211; &#8220;Federal Search Commission?&#8221;</a></p>
<p>&#8220;But the authors&#8217; specific attempts to find a hairsplit for search engines (my paraphrase here) &#8211; secret algorithms, or overblown marketing claims, or Google-is-God perceptions, or defining it as not discussion among citizens &#8211; just seem to me to be playing to the discomfort that some liberal-arts types have with anything involving technology. If computer programs are covered by copyright (something that was not so evident years ago), then search engine ranking are &#8220;opinions&#8221;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
