<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Disappearing Sex Blogs &amp; Google Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:49:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: feedthebot</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168/comment-page-1#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>feedthebot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168.php#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Danny, great suggestion for webmaster central, there is also some suggestions being made for the webmaster help Google group here...


&lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/browse_thread/thread/79355502fd27e4fd/#&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How to improve Google webmaster Help forum&lt;/a&gt;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny, great suggestion for webmaster central, there is also some suggestions being made for the webmaster help Google group here&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/browse_thread/thread/79355502fd27e4fd/#" rel="nofollow">How to improve Google webmaster Help forum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pgrote</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168/comment-page-1#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>pgrote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168.php#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Good write up, but quick question.

You said:
&quot;I&#039;d lose the part in bold. Having that same text in the same place on every page could -- could! -- be hurting the site under a new ranking system. If I were to change it, I&#039;m make sure the title in its place was richly descriptive, maybe:&quot;

So that means breadcrumbs are no longer acceptable?

Thanks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good write up, but quick question.</p>
<p>You said:<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;d lose the part in bold. Having that same text in the same place on every page could &#8212; could! &#8212; be hurting the site under a new ranking system. If I were to change it, I&#8217;m make sure the title in its place was richly descriptive, maybe:&#8221;</p>
<p>So that means breadcrumbs are no longer acceptable?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168/comment-page-1#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168.php#comment-370</guid>
		<description>I have some further thoughts in a follow-up post:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/001121.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google, Sex, Blogs, and really determining Pornography vs. Erotica&lt;/a&gt;

My *speculation* as to what happened, is that Google&#039;s anti-spam algorithm got set a little too aggressively in terms of what sites are considered porn-spam, but the key element in affecting certain blogs was *linking*, not *language*.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some further thoughts in a follow-up post:</p>
<p><a href="http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/001121.html" rel="nofollow">Google, Sex, Blogs, and really determining Pornography vs. Erotica</a></p>
<p>My *speculation* as to what happened, is that Google&#8217;s anti-spam algorithm got set a little too aggressively in terms of what sites are considered porn-spam, but the key element in affecting certain blogs was *linking*, not *language*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graywolf</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168/comment-page-1#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>graywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168.php#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Nice through writeup. Certainly wasn&#039;t a conspiracy, but there was a lot of movement for a &quot;non update&quot;

And so we&#039;re clear Google wants us to believe they are clever enough to spot linking schemes, and text links that have been paid for, but aren&#039;t smart enough to figure out pages with the same meta data may actually have different internal content ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice through writeup. Certainly wasn&#8217;t a conspiracy, but there was a lot of movement for a &#8220;non update&#8221;</p>
<p>And so we&#8217;re clear Google wants us to believe they are clever enough to spot linking schemes, and text links that have been paid for, but aren&#8217;t smart enough to figure out pages with the same meta data may actually have different internal content &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168/comment-page-1#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/of-disappearing-sex-blogs-google-updates-10168.php#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I think many people would argue that this rolling drop in rankings has affected far more than the independent adult industry.  I am seeing complaints and concerns in all forums.

But if they still had 1/3 of the datacenters left to go in October, with 1-2 months left on the rollout, that last 1-2 months rollout would coincide with what many people are reporting.

The weekend of November 18-19 marked the start of the continuous flood of complaints at Google across multiple blogs and forums.  I don&#039;t believe there has been a week since that weekend where the activity died down.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many people would argue that this rolling drop in rankings has affected far more than the independent adult industry.  I am seeing complaints and concerns in all forums.</p>
<p>But if they still had 1/3 of the datacenters left to go in October, with 1-2 months left on the rollout, that last 1-2 months rollout would coincide with what many people are reporting.</p>
<p>The weekend of November 18-19 marked the start of the continuous flood of complaints at Google across multiple blogs and forums.  I don&#8217;t believe there has been a week since that weekend where the activity died down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
