<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official: Google Removes Auto-Background Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/official-google-removes-auto-background-feature-44034/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/official-google-removes-auto-background-feature-44034</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:19:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/official-google-removes-auto-background-feature-44034/comment-page-1#comment-10203</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=44034#comment-10203</guid>
		<description>The explanation was useful. I wasn&#039;t sure if Google was going Bingle! The quality of some of the images seemed poor too. I wonder how many of the people who complained will add their own image, now they know it&#039;s optional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The explanation was useful. I wasn&#8217;t sure if Google was going Bingle! The quality of some of the images seemed poor too. I wonder how many of the people who complained will add their own image, now they know it&#8217;s optional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cq871202</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/official-google-removes-auto-background-feature-44034/comment-page-1#comment-10196</link>
		<dc:creator>cq871202</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 01:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=44034#comment-10196</guid>
		<description>while I did not try it, looks like photos get uploaded to ones picasa web account,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while I did not try it, looks like photos get uploaded to ones picasa web account,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiropractic</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/official-google-removes-auto-background-feature-44034/comment-page-1#comment-10193</link>
		<dc:creator>chiropractic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=44034#comment-10193</guid>
		<description>Does not seem like it&#039;s been 24 hours. Personally, I like the idea of having the option but pushing images on the user felt annoying. I could not seem to find a way to turn it off. Opted to search via the browser bar remainder of the day/night.

Also, while I did not try it, looks like photos get uploaded to ones picasa web account, instead of being stored locally. Wonder if images uploaded become public by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does not seem like it&#8217;s been 24 hours. Personally, I like the idea of having the option but pushing images on the user felt annoying. I could not seem to find a way to turn it off. Opted to search via the browser bar remainder of the day/night.</p>
<p>Also, while I did not try it, looks like photos get uploaded to ones picasa web account, instead of being stored locally. Wonder if images uploaded become public by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.244 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 11:26:11 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
