<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Suit Has Broad Implications For Local Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/patent-suit-has-broad-implications-for-local-search-11441/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/patent-suit-has-broad-implications-for-local-search-11441</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:05:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: S Haar</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/patent-suit-has-broad-implications-for-local-search-11441/comment-page-1#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>S Haar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/patent-suit-has-broad-implications-for-local-search-11441.php#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>I can go to the web and find this “patented” idea in dozens of different places. Many, if not most were developed relatively independently and came about at roughly the same time. Ergo, this is an obvious use of the technology. How can this not fall under the precedent of an “Obvious Result”. (I always wanted to use the word ‘ergo’ ;)  ).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can go to the web and find this “patented” idea in dozens of different places. Many, if not most were developed relatively independently and came about at roughly the same time. Ergo, this is an obvious use of the technology. How can this not fall under the precedent of an “Obvious Result”. (I always wanted to use the word ‘ergo’ ;)  ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastien Provencher</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/patent-suit-has-broad-implications-for-local-search-11441/comment-page-1#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastien Provencher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/patent-suit-has-broad-implications-for-local-search-11441.php#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>Greg,

As a former practicing lawyer, do you have a personal opinion on the case?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>As a former practicing lawyer, do you have a personal opinion on the case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.258 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 12:12:19 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
