<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay Per Post Reviews Acceptable By Some Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:39:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: geeurbie</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013/comment-page-1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>geeurbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013.php#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Paid advertising is every where so why should blogging be any different. People get paid to do mystery shopping so why not mystery blogging. This seems like a lot to do about nothing. I just placed PPA buttons on my blog as a way to monetize the blog.
I absolutely will not use adsense. I most likely will never see any paid blogging gigs as the blog has no PR, even though it is the #1 Google ranked house cleaning tips blog three times over.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paid advertising is every where so why should blogging be any different. People get paid to do mystery shopping so why not mystery blogging. This seems like a lot to do about nothing. I just placed PPA buttons on my blog as a way to monetize the blog.<br />
I absolutely will not use adsense. I most likely will never see any paid blogging gigs as the blog has no PR, even though it is the #1 Google ranked house cleaning tips blog three times over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feedthebot</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013/comment-page-1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>feedthebot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013.php#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Matt, can you give me the URL of the help page or Google documentation that provides this guidance?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, can you give me the URL of the help page or Google documentation that provides this guidance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLH</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013/comment-page-1#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>JLH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013.php#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I still say to try to get targetted traffic, the rest will work itself out.  If I can get a bunch of traffic from an on-topic blog by throwing a few dollars their way, then it&#039;s a good link.  How the search engines treat the link, well, I&#039;ll leave that up to them.  Seems to me they&#039;ve got enough on their plate than to worry about paid blog posts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still say to try to get targetted traffic, the rest will work itself out.  If I can get a bunch of traffic from an on-topic blog by throwing a few dollars their way, then it&#8217;s a good link.  How the search engines treat the link, well, I&#8217;ll leave that up to them.  Seems to me they&#8217;ve got enough on their plate than to worry about paid blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AussieWebmaster</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013/comment-page-1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>AussieWebmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013.php#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of the witch hunt for paid listings can be forgotten. Why not just apply the relevancy parameter to this. Do people who go out and get links from other sites by whatever means have differences?
I do think the people giving the links have a little responsibility but at the end of the day when a site has a link to their brother&#039;s site about sports news and they are a site not related to that you guys generally just decrease the impact of the link. But to start a witch hunt through the web is not very realistic and the scope pushes you to dramatically decrease your page build or profits since the human eyes you would need to pay would be quite substantial.
Or you have the situation like ODP or what is now surfacing at Digg and the other social networks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of the witch hunt for paid listings can be forgotten. Why not just apply the relevancy parameter to this. Do people who go out and get links from other sites by whatever means have differences?<br />
I do think the people giving the links have a little responsibility but at the end of the day when a site has a link to their brother&#8217;s site about sports news and they are a site not related to that you guys generally just decrease the impact of the link. But to start a witch hunt through the web is not very realistic and the scope pushes you to dramatically decrease your page build or profits since the human eyes you would need to pay would be quite substantial.<br />
Or you have the situation like ODP or what is now surfacing at Digg and the other social networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013/comment-page-1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013.php#comment-108</guid>
		<description>The specific guideline for doing paid reviews or paid links is to make sure that your links don&#039;t affect search engines. You can do that via a nofollow attribute on your links, or an internal redirect which goes through a page which is robot.txt&#039;ed out, or several other methods.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The specific guideline for doing paid reviews or paid links is to make sure that your links don&#8217;t affect search engines. You can do that via a nofollow attribute on your links, or an internal redirect which goes through a page which is robot.txt&#8217;ed out, or several other methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikkel deMib Svendsen</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013/comment-page-1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikkel deMib Svendsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/pay-per-post-reviews-acceptable-by-some-search-engines-10013.php#comment-107</guid>
		<description>&gt; Tough one, no?

No, I don&#039;t think so. It&#039;s the same as always - the engines say one thing, we do another :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Tough one, no?</p>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t think so. It&#8217;s the same as always &#8211; the engines say one thing, we do another :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.259 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 10:29:17 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
