<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PreFound Relaunches, Tries To Rise Above Social Search Din</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/prefound-relaunches-tries-to-rise-above-social-search-din-10777/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/prefound-relaunches-tries-to-rise-above-social-search-din-10777</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:24:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AdamJusko</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/prefound-relaunches-tries-to-rise-above-social-search-din-10777/comment-page-1#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamJusko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/prefound-relaunches-tries-to-rise-above-social-search-din-10777.php#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>Greg,

I would add &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bessed.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bessed&lt;/a&gt; to your list of search sites trying to add the human element to create better results.

One of the challenges of human-powered search is that opening up search results to be finagled by the masses opens the spam door even wider than the robot-based engines do.

We at Bessed are encouraging visitor participation via commenting on results and suggesting new sites in the comments section, but we just can&#039;t see opening it up to the extent that everyone can get their sites added immediately with no screening process.  It&#039;s more work for us and a slower process, but I can&#039;t see how the wiki type model is going to be useful due to the spam issue.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>I would add <a href="http://www.bessed.com" rel="nofollow">Bessed</a> to your list of search sites trying to add the human element to create better results.</p>
<p>One of the challenges of human-powered search is that opening up search results to be finagled by the masses opens the spam door even wider than the robot-based engines do.</p>
<p>We at Bessed are encouraging visitor participation via commenting on results and suggesting new sites in the comments section, but we just can&#8217;t see opening it up to the extent that everyone can get their sites added immediately with no screening process.  It&#8217;s more work for us and a slower process, but I can&#8217;t see how the wiki type model is going to be useful due to the spam issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
